-
Vote for the Everyday Digital Native Video Contest!
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Mar 20, 2012
—
last modified
May 08, 2015 12:32 PM
—
filed under:
Video,
Featured,
Researchers at Work,
Digital Natives
The Centre for Internet & Society and Hivos are super excited to present the final videos in the Everyday Digital Native Video Contest. We invite readers to vote for the TOP 5 Videos. The finalists will each win EUR500! Voting closes March 31, 2012
Located in
Digital Natives
-
Habeas Data in India
-
by
Vipul Kharbanda and edited by Elonnai Hickok
—
published
Dec 10, 2016
—
last modified
Dec 10, 2016 04:01 AM
—
filed under:
Featured,
Habeas Data,
Internet Governance,
Privacy
Habeas Data is a latin word which can be loosely translated to mean “have the data”. The right has been primarily conceptualized, designed, ratified, and implemented by various nation-states in the background of a shared common history of decades of torture, terror, and other repressive practices under military juntas and other fascist regimes.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
CIS Submission to TRAI Consultation Note on Model for Nation-wide Interoperable and Scalable Public Wi-Fi Networks
-
by
Japreet Grewal, Pranesh Prakash, Sharath Chandra, Sumandro Chattapadhyay, Sunil Abraham, and Udbhav Tiwari, with expert comments from Amelia Andersdotter
—
published
Dec 12, 2016
—
last modified
Dec 12, 2016 01:59 PM
—
filed under:
Digital Payment,
Public Wireless Network,
TRAI,
Internet Governance,
Telecom,
Featured,
Aadhaar,
Homepage,
UID
This submission presents responses by the CIS on the Consultation Note on Model for Nation-wide Interoperable and Scalable Public Wi-Fi Networks published by the TRAI on November 15, 2016. Our analysis of the solution proposed in the Note, in brief, is that there is no need of a solution for non-existing interoperability problem for authentication and payment services for accessing public Wi-Fi networks. The proposed solution in this Note only adds to over-regulation in this sector, and does not incentivise new investment in the sector, but only establishes UIDAI and NPCI as the monopoly service providers for authentication and payment services.
Located in
Telecom
/
Blog
-
Comments on the Report of the Committee on Digital Payments (December 2016)
-
by
Sumandro Chattapadhyay and Amber Sinha
—
published
Jan 12, 2017
—
last modified
Jan 12, 2017 12:32 PM
—
filed under:
UID,
Digital ID,
Big Data,
Digital Economy,
Digital Access,
Privacy,
Digital Security,
Data Revolution,
Digital Payment,
Internet Governance,
Digital India,
Data Protection,
Demonetisation,
Homepage,
Featured,
Aadhaar
The Committee on Digital Payments constituted by the Ministry of Finance and chaired by Ratan P. Watal, Principal Advisor, NITI Aayog, submitted its report on the "Medium Term Recommendations to Strengthen Digital Payments Ecosystem" on December 09, 2016. The report was made public on December 27, and comments were sought from the general public. Here are the comments submitted by the Centre for Internet and Society.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Flaws in the UIDAI Process
-
by
Hans Varghese Mathews
—
published
Mar 06, 2016
—
last modified
Mar 06, 2016 10:40 AM
—
filed under:
UID,
Privacy,
Internet Governance,
Featured,
Aadhaar,
Homepage
The accuracy of biometric identification depends on the chance of a false positive: the probability that the identifiers of two persons will match. Individuals whose identifiers match might be termed duplicands. When very many people are to be identified success can be measured by the (low) proportion of duplicands. The Government of India is engaged upon biometrically identifying the entire population of India. An experiment performed at an early stage of the programme has allowed us to estimate the chance of a false positive: and from that to estimate the proportion of duplicands. For the current population of 1.2 billion the expected proportion of duplicands is 1/121, a ratio which is far too high.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Exploring Big Data for Development: An Electricity Sector Case Study from India
-
by
Sumandro Chattapadhyay
—
published
Mar 29, 2017
—
last modified
Mar 16, 2019 04:33 AM
—
filed under:
Big Data,
Data Systems,
Researchers at Work,
Research,
Featured,
Publications,
Big Data for Development
This working paper by Ritam Sengupta, Dr. Richard Heeks, Sumandro Chattapadhyay, and Dr. Christopher Foster draws from the field study undertaken by Ritam Sengupta, and is published by the Global Development Institute, University of Manchester. The field study was commissioned by the CIS, with support from the University of Manchester and the University of Sheffield.
Located in
RAW
-
The Digital Classroom: Social Justice and Pedagogy
-
by
Nishant Shah
—
published
Dec 23, 2011
—
last modified
May 08, 2015 12:36 PM
—
filed under:
Higher Education,
Access to Knowledge,
Digital Natives,
Featured,
New Pedagogies,
Researchers at Work,
Digital Pluralism
What happens when we look at the classroom as a space of social justice? What are the ways in which students can be engaged in learning beyond rote memorisation? What innovative methods can be evolved to make students stakeholders in their learning process? These were some of the questions that were thrown up and discussed at the 2 day Faculty Training workshop for participant from colleges included in the Pathways to Higher Education programme, supported by Ford Foundation and collaboratively executed by the Higher Education Innovation and Research Application and the Centre for Internet and Society, Bangalore.
Located in
Digital Natives
/
Pathways to Higher Education
-
Platforms, Power, and Politics: Perspectives from Domestic and Care Work in India
-
by
Aayush Rathi, and Ambika Tandon
—
published
Jun 27, 2021
—
last modified
Jul 07, 2021 03:19 PM
—
filed under:
Digital Economy,
Researchers at Work,
Platform-Work,
Featured,
RAW Research,
Homepage,
Digital Domestic Work
CIS has been undertaking a two-year project studying the entry of digital platforms in the domestic and care work in India, supported by the Association for Progressive Communications as part of the Feminist Internet Research Network. Implemented through 2019-21, the objective of the project is to use a feminist lens to critique platform modalities and orient platformisation dynamics in radically different, worker-first ways. Ambika Tandon and Aayush Rathi led the research team at CIS. The Domestic Workers’ Rights Union is a partner in the implementation of the project, as co-researchers. Geeta Menon, head of DWRU, was an advisor on the project, and the research team consisted of Parijatha G.P., Radha Keerthana, Zeenathunnisa, and Sumathi, who are office holders in the union and are responsible for organising workers and addressing their concerns.
Located in
RAW
-
Web Accessibility Policy Making: An International Perspective
-
by
Nirmita Narasimhan
—
published
Feb 28, 2012
—
last modified
Sep 25, 2012 05:33 AM
—
filed under:
Featured,
Accessibility,
Access to Knowledge
G3ict and CIS are pleased to announce the publication of a new, improved edition of the Web Accessibility Policy Making: An International Perspective. The report published in cooperation with the Hans Foundation provides an updated synopsis of the many policies that governments have implemented around the world to ensure that the Internet and websites are accessible to persons with disabilities.
Located in
Accessibility
-
Delhi High Court Orders Blocking of Websites after Sony Complains Infringement of 2014 FIFA World Cup Telecast Rights
-
by
Anubha Sinha
—
published
Jul 08, 2014
—
last modified
Jul 08, 2014 07:02 AM
—
filed under:
Featured,
Homepage,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
Of late the Indian judiciary has been issuing John Doe orders to block websites, most recently in Multi Screen Media v. Sunit Singh and Others. The order mandated blocking of 472 websites, out of which approximately 267 websites were blocked as on July 7, 2014. This trend is an extremely dangerous one because it encourages flagrant censorship by intermediaries based on a judicial order which does not provide for specific blocking of a URL, instead provides for blocking of the entire website.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog