-
Communications from DeitY regarding blocking of Traffic emanating from IP addresses from States assessed to be sensitive in the current prevailing situation
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Sep 11, 2012
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Resources
-
Content Removal on Facebook — A Case of Privatised Censorship?
-
by
Jessamine Mathew
—
published
Jun 16, 2014
—
filed under:
Facebook,
Internet Governance,
Censorship,
Privacy
Any activity on Facebook, be it creating an account, posting a picture or status update or creating a group or page, is bound by Facebook’s Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. These contain a list of content that is prohibited from being published on Facebook which ranges from hate speech to pornography to violation of privacy.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Content takedown and users' rights
-
by
Torsha Sarkar, Gurshabad Grover
—
published
Feb 14, 2020
—
last modified
Feb 17, 2020 05:18 AM
—
filed under:
Internet Freedom,
Internet Governance,
Intermediary Liability,
Censorship
After Shreya Singhal v Union of India, commentators have continued to question the constitutionality of the content takedown regime under Section 69A of the IT Act (and the Blocking Rules issued under it). There has also been considerable debate around how the judgement has changed this regime: specifically about (i) whether originators of content are entitled to a hearing, (ii) whether Rule 16 of the Blocking Rules, which mandates confidentiality of content takedown requests received by intermediaries from the Government, continues to be operative, and (iii) the effect of Rule 16 on the rights of the originator and the public to challenge executive action. In this opinion piece, we attempt to answer some of these questions.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Creativity, Politics, and Internet Censorship
-
by
Puthiya Purayil Sneha
—
published
Jun 16, 2016
—
last modified
Jun 17, 2016 07:07 AM
—
filed under:
Researchers at Work,
Practice,
Art,
Censorship
In collaboration with Karnataka for Kashmir, we organised a discussion on 'Creativity, Politics and Internet Censorship' on May 25, 2016. Mahum Shabir, a legal activist and artist, Mir Suhail, political cartoonist with Kashmir Reader and Rising Kashmir, and Habeel Iqbal, a lawyer who has worked with several justice groups in Kashmir, shared some of their work and experiences. This discussion was organised as part of Port of Kashmir 2016, a series of events bringing together a small collective of people using different modes of art and activism to address crucial challenges to free speech and democracy in the state.
Located in
RAW
-
Criminal defamation remains and so does the debate
-
by
Japreet Grewal
—
published
May 19, 2016
—
last modified
May 23, 2016 06:05 AM
—
filed under:
Criminal Defamation,
Defamation,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Censorship
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Criminal Defamation: The Urgent Cause That has United Rahul Gandhi, Arvind Kejriwal and Subramanian Swamy
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Jul 16, 2015
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Chilling Effect,
Censorship
Three years ago when the then Janata Party president Subramanian Swamy accused Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi and his mother of misappropriation of funds while trying to revive the National Herald newspaper, the Nehru-Gandhi scion threatened to sue him.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
News & Media
-
Criticism mounts over India censorship
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Aug 27, 2012
—
filed under:
Social media,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Public Accountability,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
India’s government is facing fierce criticism from privacy groups, political opponents and irate internet users accusing it of an excessive and poorly targeted censorship drive as it seeks to contain social alarm triggered by communal unrest.
Located in
News & Media
-
Dark days for the creative class in India: Siddiqui
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Feb 17, 2014
—
last modified
Feb 17, 2014 09:14 AM
—
filed under:
Internet Governance,
Censorship
As India’s literacy rate improves, governments, courts, media, publishers and big business are all stifling free speech.
Located in
News & Media
-
Decline in web freedom steepest in India: Report
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Oct 03, 2013
—
last modified
Oct 24, 2013 03:50 AM
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
In a report on the state of internet in 60 countries, Freedom House, a US-based organization, said that in 2013 India saw the "most significant year-on-year decline" in terms of the web freedom.
Located in
News & Media
-
DeitY says 143 URLs have been Blocked in 2015; Procedure for Blocking Content Remains Opaque and in Urgent Need of Transparency Measures
-
by
Jyoti Panday
—
published
Apr 29, 2015
—
last modified
Apr 30, 2015 07:37 AM
—
filed under:
Censorship,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
RTI,
Intermediary Liability,
Accountability,
Featured,
69A,
Internet Governance,
Chilling Effect,
Transparency,
Homepage,
Blocking
Across India on 30 December 2014, following an order issued by the Department of Telecom (DOT), Internet Service Providers (ISPs) blocked 32 websites including Vimeo, Dailymotion, GitHub and Pastebin.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
