-
Shreya Singhal and 66A
-
by
Sunil Abraham
—
published
Apr 11, 2015
—
last modified
Apr 19, 2015 08:09 AM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Censorship,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Chilling Effect
Most software code has dependencies. Simple and reproducible methods exist for mapping and understanding the impact of these dependencies. Legal code also has dependencies --across court orders and within a single court order. And since court orders are not produced using a structured mark-up language, experts are required to understand the precedential value of a court order.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
The Supreme Court Judgment in Shreya Singhal and What It Does for Intermediary Liability in India?
-
by
Jyoti Panday
—
published
Apr 11, 2015
—
last modified
Apr 17, 2015 11:59 PM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Censorship,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Intermediary Liability,
Chilling Effect
Even as free speech advocates and users celebrate the Supreme Court of India's landmark judgment striking down Section 66A of the Information Technology Act of 2000, news that the Central government has begun work on drafting a new provision to replace the said section of the Act has been trickling in.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
You can still get into trouble for online posts: Digital law experts
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Mar 30, 2015
—
last modified
Apr 02, 2015 01:44 AM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Censorship,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Chilling Effect
The internet in India is freer now, but individuals could still to get into trouble for online posts, say digital media and law experts. Hailing the Supreme Court judgment on Tuesday as a landmark verdict for free speech in India, experts who have closely read the judgment say there is much to be careful about too.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
News & Media
-
SECTION 66A: DELETE
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Mar 30, 2015
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Censorship,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Chilling Effect
The Supreme Court has killed a law that allowed the Government to control social media. What’s the Net worth of freedom hereafter?
Located in
Internet Governance
/
News & Media
-
Three reasons why 66A verdict is momentous
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Mar 29, 2015
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Censorship,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Chilling Effect
Earlier this week, the fundamental right to freedom of expression posted a momentous victory. The nation's top court struck down the much-reviled Section 66A of the IT Act — which criminalized communications that are "grossly offensive", cause "annoyance", etc — as "unconstitutionally vague", "arbitrarily, excessively, and disproportionately" encumbering freedom of speech, and likely to have a "chilling effect" on legitimate speech.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
India's landmark online speech ruling is step toward greater press freedom
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Mar 29, 2015
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Censorship,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Chilling Effect
In an historic decision, India's Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down part of a law used to silence criticism and free expression. While this marks a pivotal victory that has been welcomed in many quarters, many challenges remain for press freedom in the country.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
News & Media
-
66A DEAD. LONG LIVE 66A!
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Mar 28, 2015
—
last modified
Apr 01, 2015 02:11 AM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Censorship,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Chilling Effect
Last Tuesday, Twitter CEO Dick Costolo walked into Prime Minister Narendra Modi's office. India's most compulsive and most-followed tweeter, Modi, as Gujarat chief minister, had protested when the Manmohan Singh government blocked the micro-blogging site of a few journalists. Modi had blacked out his own Twitter profile and tweeted: “May God give good sense to everyone.”
Located in
Internet Governance
/
News & Media
-
SC has set a high threshold for tolerance: Lawrence Liang
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Mar 28, 2015
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Censorship,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Chilling Effect
Lawyer-activist Lawrence Liang on why SC upheld section 69A and the implications of striking down section 66A.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
News & Media
-
What 66A Judgment Means For Free Speech Online
-
by
Geetha Hariharan
—
published
Mar 27, 2015
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Censorship,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Chilling Effect
This week India's Supreme Court redefined the boundaries of freedom of speech on the internet. With the Court's decision in Shreya Singhal & Ors. v. Union of India, Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, has been struck down in entirety and is no longer good law.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
India's Supreme Court Axes Online Censorship Law, But Challenges Remain
-
by
Subhashish Panigrahi
—
published
Mar 27, 2015
—
last modified
Mar 27, 2015 02:38 AM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Censorship,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Chilling Effect
The Supreme Court of India took a remarkable step to protect free expression on March 24, 2015, striking down controversial section 66A of the IT Act that criminalized “grossly offensive” content online. In response to a public interest litigation filed by Indian law student Shreya Singhal, the court made this landmark judgement calling the section “vague”, “broad” and “unconstitutional”. Since Tuesday's announcement, the news has trended nationally on Twitter, with more than 50,000 tweets bearing the hashtags #Sec66A and #66A.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
