-
Section 66F of the Information Technology Act, 2000
-
by
Snehashish Ghosh
—
published
Nov 22, 2012
—
last modified
Dec 02, 2012 09:39 AM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Internet Governance
Section 66F: Punishment for cyber terrorism.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Resources
-
The real Sibal’s law: Resisting Section 66A is futile
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Nov 30, 2012
—
last modified
Dec 03, 2012 05:16 AM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Internet Governance
The Information Technology Act is “substantially the same” as laws instituted in other democracies like UK and the United States. What’s more, the language that is employed in various sections is exactly the same. Thus was the thrust of Kapil Sibal’s defense of Section 66A on NDTV last night.
Located in
News & Media
-
Is the new ‘interception’ order old wine in a new bottle?
-
by
Elonnai Hickok, Vipul Kharbanda, Shweta Mohandas and Pranav M. Bidare
—
published
Dec 29, 2018
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Privacy,
Internet Governance,
Cyber Security,
Information Technology
The government could always authorise intelligence agencies to intercept and monitor communications, but the lack of clarity is problematic.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Invisible Censorship: How the Government Censors Without Being Seen
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Dec 14, 2011
—
last modified
Jan 04, 2012 08:59 AM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Google,
Access to Knowledge,
Social media,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Intermediary Liability,
Featured,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
The Indian government wants to censor the Internet without being seen to be censoring the Internet. This article by Pranesh Prakash shows how the government has been able to achieve this through the Information Technology Act and the Intermediary Guidelines Rules it passed in April 2011. It now wants methods of censorship that leave even fewer traces, which is why Mr. Kapil Sibal, Union Minister for Communications and Information Technology talks of Internet 'self-regulation', and has brought about an amendment of the Copyright Act that requires instant removal of content.
Located in
Internet Governance
-
Parliament panel blasts govt over ambiguous internet laws
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Mar 28, 2013
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
IT Act,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Subordinate Legislation has come out with a report in which it has lambasted the government and asked it to make changes to IT rules that govern internet-related cases in India.
Located in
News & Media
-
Department of Telecommunications Order u/s. 69A IT Act Blocking 32 URLS
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Dec 31, 2014
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
On December 17, 2014, the Dept. of Telecommunications blocked 32 URLs (as it was ordered to do so by the by Dept. of Electronics & IT — specifically the Designated Officer under section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and under the Information Technology (Procedures and Safeguards for Blocking of Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009), those being:
01) https://justpaste.it/
02) http://hastebin.com
03) http://codepad.org
04) http://pastie.org
05) https://pasteeorg
06) http://paste2.org
07) http://slexy.org
08) http://paste4btc.com/
09) http://0bin.net
10) http://www.heypasteit.com
11) http://sourceforge.net/projects/phorkie
12) http://atnsoft.com/textpaster
13) https://archive.org
14) http://www.hpage.com
15) http://www.ipage.com/
16) http://www.webs.com/
17) http://www.weebly.com/
18) http://www.000webhost.com/
19) https://www.freehosting.com
20) https://vimeo.com/
21) http://www.dailymotion.com/
22) http://pastebin.com
23) https://gist.github.com
24) http://www.ipaste.eu
25) https://thesnippetapp.com
26) https://snipt.net
27) http://tny.ct (Tinypaste)
28) https://github.com (gist-it)
29) http://snipplr.com/
30) http://termbin.com
31) http://www.snippetsource.net
32) https://cryptbin.com
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Resources
-
Department of Telecommunications Order u/s. 69A IT Act Blocking 32 URLS (2014-12-17, compressed version)
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Dec 31, 2014
—
last modified
Dec 31, 2014 02:48 PM
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
IT Act,
Censorship
On December 17, 2014, the Dept. of Telecommunications blocked 32 URLs (as it was ordered to do so by the by Dept. of Electronics & IT — specifically the Designated Officer under section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and under the Information Technology (Procedures and Safeguards for Blocking of Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009), those being:
01) https://justpaste.it/
02) http://hastebin.com
03) http://codepad.org
04) http://pastie.org
05) https://pasteeorg
06) http://paste2.org
07) http://slexy.org
08) http://paste4btc.com/
09) http://0bin.net
10) http://www.heypasteit.com
11) http://sourceforge.net/projects/phorkie
12) http://atnsoft.com/textpaster
13) https://archive.org
14) http://www.hpage.com
15) http://www.ipage.com/
16) http://www.webs.com/
17) http://www.weebly.com/
18) http://www.000webhost.com/
19) https://www.freehosting.com
20) https://vimeo.com/
21) http://www.dailymotion.com/
22) http://pastebin.com
23) https://gist.github.com
24) http://www.ipaste.eu
25) https://thesnippetapp.com
26) https://snipt.net
27) http://tny.ct (Tinypaste)
28) https://github.com (gist-it)
29) http://snipplr.com/
30) http://termbin.com
31) http://www.snippetsource.net
32) https://cryptbin.com
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Resources
-
Department of Telecommunications Order u/s. 69A IT Act Blocking 32 URLS (2014-12-17, plaintext version)
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Dec 31, 2014
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
IT Act,
Censorship
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Resources
-
Internet censorship will continue in opaque fashion
-
by
Sunil Abraham
—
published
Mar 26, 2015
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Censorship,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Chilling Effect
A division bench of the Supreme Court has ruled on three sections of the Information Technology Act 2000 - Section 66A, Section 79 and Section 69A. The draconian Section 66A was originally meant to tackle spam and cyber-stalking but was used by the powerful elite to crack down on online dissent and criticism.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Live Chat: Win for Free Speech
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Mar 26, 2015
—
last modified
Mar 26, 2015 04:07 PM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Censorship,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Chilling Effect
Join us for a live chat at 5.30 pm on SC striking down the Section 66A of the IT Act which had permitted the arrest of people for posting "offensive content" on the internet.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
News & Media