-
Breaking Down Section 66A of the IT Act
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Nov 25, 2012
—
last modified
Dec 14, 2012 09:51 AM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Public Accountability,
Internet Governance,
Featured,
Homepage
Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, which prescribes 'punishment for sending offensive messages through communication service, etc.' is widely held by lawyers and legal academics to be unconstitutional. In this post Pranesh Prakash explores why that section is unconstitutional, how it came to be, the state of the law elsewhere, and how we can move forward.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Whose Change is it Anyway?
-
by
Nishant Shah
—
published
Jun 18, 2013
—
last modified
Apr 17, 2015 10:56 AM
—
filed under:
Digital Activism,
RAW Publications,
Digital Natives,
Youth,
Featured,
Publications,
Homepage
This thought piece is an attempt to reflect critically on existing practices of “making change” and its implications for the future of citizen action in information and network societies. It observes that change is constantly and explicitly invoked at different stages in research, practice, and policy in relation to digital technologies, citizen action, and network societies.
Located in
Digital Natives
/
Blog
-
Negative of porn
-
by
Namita A. Malhotra
—
published
Sep 12, 2009
—
last modified
Aug 02, 2011 08:35 AM
—
filed under:
Featured,
Art,
Censorship
The post deals with what has been written about Savita Bhabhi in an attempt to make sense of her peccadiloes and with the seeming futility of Porn studies located in America to our different reality. I take the liberty of exploring my own experiential account of pornography since I feel that in that account (mine and others) when done seriously, certain aspects of pornography emerge that address questions that are about cinema, images, sex, philosophy and how desire works. The title is mischeviously inspired from Dr. Pek Van Andel's recent video of MRI images of people having sex.
Located in
RAW
/
…
/
Blogs
/
Porn: Law, Video & Technology
-
Analysis of the Copyright (Amendment) Bill, 2010
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Jul 18, 2010
—
last modified
Sep 21, 2011 06:01 AM
—
filed under:
Access to Knowledge,
Consumer Rights,
Copyright,
Fair Dealings,
Public Accountability,
Intellectual Property Rights,
RTI,
Featured,
Broadcasting,
Publications,
Submissions,
Technological Protection Measures
CIS analyses the Copyright (Amendment) Bill, 2010, from a public interest perspective to sift the good from the bad, and importantly to point out what crucial amendments should be considered but have not been so far.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Fallacies, Lies, and Video Pirates
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Aug 24, 2009
—
last modified
Aug 04, 2011 04:43 AM
—
filed under:
Featured,
Intellectual Property Rights
At a recent conference on counterfeiting and piracy, industry representatives variously pushed for stiffer laws for IP violation, more stringent enforcement of existing IP laws, and championed IP as the most important thing for businesses today. This blog post tries to show how their arguments are flawed.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Analysis of the Copyright (Amendment) Bill 2012
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
May 23, 2012
—
last modified
Nov 12, 2013 02:13 PM
—
filed under:
Access to Knowledge,
Fair Dealings,
Piracy,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Economics,
Intermediary Liability,
Featured,
Technological Protection Measures
There are some welcome provisions in the Copyright (Amendment) Bill 2012, and some worrisome provisions. Pranesh Prakash examines five positive changes, four negative ones, and notes the several missed opportunities. The larger concern, though, is that many important issues have not been addressed by these amendments, and how copyright policy is made without evidence and often out of touch with contemporary realities of the digital era.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Super Cassettes v. MySpace
-
by
Ujwala Uppaluri
—
published
Oct 30, 2012
—
last modified
Oct 31, 2012 10:27 AM
—
filed under:
Access to Knowledge,
Copyright,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Intermediary Liability,
Featured
The Delhi High Court’s judgment in Super Cassettes v. MySpace last July is worrying for a number of reasons. The court failed to appreciate the working of intermediaries online and disregard all pragmatic considerations involved. The consequences for free expression and particularly for file sharing by users of services online are especially unfavourable.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Pervasive Mobile Technologies: Meet Our Mobile Devices!
-
by
Jadine Lannon
—
published
Nov 23, 2012
—
last modified
Dec 21, 2012 07:48 AM
—
filed under:
Featured,
Access to Knowledge,
Pervasive Technologies
As a part of the Pervasive Technologies: Access to Knowledge in the Marketplace research project, the Centre for Internet & Society (CIS) is researching 12 mobile phone devices to generate a better understanding of the intellectual property (IP) implications of pervasive mobile technologies available in the Indian market. This post is an introduction to our 12 mobile phones.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
The State of the Internet's Languages Report
-
by
Puthiya Purayil Sneha
—
published
Mar 07, 2022
—
last modified
Mar 07, 2022 03:01 PM
—
filed under:
RAW Research,
Featured,
Researchers at Work,
RAW Blog
The first-ever State of the Internet’s Languages Report was launched by Whose Knowledge? on February 23, 2022 (just after the International Mother Language day), along with research partners Oxford Internet Institute and the Centre for Internet and Society. This extraordinarily community-sourced effort, with over 100 people involved is now available online, with translations in multiple languages.
Located in
RAW
-
The All India Privacy Symposium: Conference Report
-
by
Natasha Vaz
—
published
Apr 15, 2012
—
last modified
Apr 30, 2012 05:16 AM
—
filed under:
Featured,
Internet Governance,
Privacy
Privacy India, the Centre for Internet and Society and Society in Action Group, with support from the International Development Research Centre, Privacy International and Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative had organised the All India Privacy Symposium at the India International Centre in New Delhi, on February 4, 2012. Natasha Vaz reports about the event.
Located in
Internet Governance
