-
Resisting Revolutions
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
May 29, 2012
Nishant Shah's peer reviewed journal article was published in Democracy, Volume 55, Issue 2.
Located in
Digital Natives
-
Resources
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Oct 20, 2009
—
last modified
Oct 20, 2009 03:29 AM
—
filed under:
Bayh-Dole,
Access to Knowledge,
Access to Medicine,
Open Access,
Public Accountability,
Open Innovation
A collection of resources that will help one navigate through the arguments and evidence for and against the Indian "Bayh-Dole" bill.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Publications
/
PUPFIP Bill
-
Respite from Internet Censorship?
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Aug 10, 2012
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
Of late, a lot of the blocked websites have started reappearing. So should we sit back and relax? We take a look at how it's not really the start of something beautiful...writes Nimish Sawant. Sunil Abraham is quoted.
Located in
News & Media
-
Responding to govt requests is a challenge for online firms: Colin Maclay
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Mar 13, 2013
—
last modified
Mar 15, 2013 05:07 AM
—
filed under:
Internet Governance,
Privacy
Colin M. Maclay, MD of Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard, on challenges in cyberspace.
Located in
News & Media
-
Response by Knowledge Commons
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Sep 30, 2008
Arguments on why section 4.11 of the Patents Manual needs to be modified.
Located in
Openness
/
Publications
/
Software Patents
-
Response to RTI on Decisions of the Cyber Regulation Advisory Committee
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Jan 09, 2013
—
filed under:
Internet Governance
The Department of Electronics & Information Technology, Ministry of Communications & Information Technology responded to a right to information (RTI) application filed by Saket Bisani on behalf of the Centre for Internet & Society on July 13, 2012 through notification No. 14(110)/2012-ESD, dated October 3, 2010.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Resources
-
Response to Suggestions and Comments Sent on GIGW by Committee Members
-
by
Admin
—
published
Nov 26, 2017
Located in
Accessibility
/
Files
-
Response to the ‘Call for Comments’ on The Santa Clara Principles on Transparency and Accountability
-
by
Torsha Sarkar and Suhan S
—
published
Jul 01, 2020
—
last modified
Jul 01, 2020 05:56 AM
The Santa Clara Principles on Transparency and Accountability, proposed in 2018, provided a robust framework of transparency reporting for online companies dealing with user-generated content. In 2020, the framework underwent a period of consultation "to determine whether the Santa Clara Principles should be updated for the ever-changing content moderation landscape."
In lieu of this, we presented our responses, which are in-line with our previous research and findings on transparency reporting of online companies, especially in context of the Indian digital space.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Response to the Consultation Paper on Regulatory Framework for Over-The-Top (OTT) Communication Services
-
by
Gurshabad Grover, Nikhil Srinath and Aayush Rathi
—
published
Jan 11, 2019
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Files
-
Responses to Trai’s consultation paper on free data contain some good suggestions
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Aug 17, 2016
—
filed under:
TRAI,
Net Neutrality,
Internet Governance
Trai has announced that it will come up with a final consultation paper on ‘Free Data’, and also a pre-consultation paper on Net Neutrality by the end of this month.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
News & Media