-
The 2010 Special 301 Report Is More of the Same, Slightly Less Shrill
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
May 13, 2010
—
last modified
Oct 03, 2011 05:37 AM
—
filed under:
Development,
Consumer Rights,
Access to Knowledge,
Copyright,
Piracy,
Access to Medicine,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Data Protection,
FLOSS,
Technological Protection Measures,
Publications
Pranesh Prakash examines the numerous flaws in the Special 301 from the Indian perspective, to come to the conclusion that the Indian government should openly refuse to acknowledge such a flawed report. He notes that the Consumers International survey, to which CIS contributed the India report, serves as an effective counter to the Special 301 report.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Does the Safe-Harbor Program Adequately Address Third Parties Online?
-
by
Rebecca Schild
—
published
Apr 16, 2010
—
last modified
Aug 02, 2011 07:19 AM
—
filed under:
Privacy,
Internet Governance,
Facebook,
Data Protection,
Social Networking
While many citizens outside of the US and EU benefit from the data privacy provisions the Safe Harbor Program, it remains unclear how successfully the program can govern privacy practices when third-parties continue to gain more rights over personal data. Using Facebook as a site of analysis, I will attempt to shed light on the deficiencies of the framework for addressing the complexity of data flows in the online ecosystem.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
IT Act and Commerce
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Aug 11, 2009
—
last modified
Aug 02, 2011 07:41 AM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Digital Governance,
Data Protection,
Authentication,
Security
This is a guest post by Rahul Matthan, partner in the law firm Trilegal, and widely regarded as one of the leading experts on information technology law in India. In this post, Mr. Matthan looks at the provisions in the amended Information Technology Act of interest to commerce, namely electronic signatures and data protection.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
