-
The 2010 Special 301 Report Is More of the Same, Slightly Less Shrill
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
May 13, 2010
—
last modified
Oct 03, 2011 05:37 AM
—
filed under:
Development,
Consumer Rights,
Access to Knowledge,
Copyright,
Piracy,
Access to Medicine,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Data Protection,
FLOSS,
Technological Protection Measures,
Publications
Pranesh Prakash examines the numerous flaws in the Special 301 from the Indian perspective, to come to the conclusion that the Indian government should openly refuse to acknowledge such a flawed report. He notes that the Consumers International survey, to which CIS contributed the India report, serves as an effective counter to the Special 301 report.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Privacy is not a unidimensional concept
-
by
Amber Sinha
—
published
Aug 07, 2017
—
filed under:
Internet Governance,
Aadhaar,
Data Protection,
Privacy
Right to privacy is important not only for our negotiations with the information age but also to counter the transgressions of a welfare state. A robust right to privacy is essential for all citizens in India to defend their individual autonomy in the face of invasive state actions purportedly for the public good. The ruling of this nine-judge bench will have far-reaching impact on the extent and scope of rights available to us all.
Located in
Internet Governance
-
The National Privacy Principles
-
by
Pooja Saxena and Amber Sinha
—
published
Mar 21, 2016
—
filed under:
Data Protection,
Privacy
In this infographic, we try to break down the National Privacy Principles developed by the Group of Experts on Privacy led by the Former Chief Justice A.P. Shah in 2012.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Contestations of Data, ECJ Safe Harbor Ruling and Lessons for India
-
by
Jyoti Panday
—
published
Oct 14, 2015
—
filed under:
Access to Knowledge,
Digital Economy,
Public Accountability,
Privacy,
Platform Responsibility,
Data Protection,
Accountability,
Digital Security,
Digital India,
Internet Governance
The European Court of Justice has invalidated a European Commission decision, which had previously concluded that the 'Safe Harbour Privacy Principles' provide adequate protections for European citizens’ privacy rights for the transfer of personal data between European Union and United States. The inadequacies of the framework is not news for the European Commission and action by ECJ has been a long time coming. The ruling raises important questions about how the claims of citizenship are being negotiated in the context of the internet, and how increasingly the contestations of personal data are being employed in the discourse.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Electoral Databases – Privacy and Security Concerns
-
by
Snehashish Ghosh
—
published
Jan 16, 2014
—
last modified
Jan 16, 2014 11:07 AM
—
filed under:
Digital Governance,
Privacy,
Cybersecurity,
Data Protection,
Internet Governance,
Safety,
Information Technology,
Cyber Security,
Security,
e-Governance,
Transparency, Politics,
E-Governance
In this blogpost, Snehashish Ghosh analyzes privacy and security concerns which have surfaced with the digitization, centralization and standardization of the electoral database and argues that even though the law provides the scope for protection of electoral databases, the State has not taken any steps to ensure its safety.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Privacy after Big Data: Compilation of Early Research
-
by
Saumyaa Naidu
—
published
Nov 12, 2016
—
last modified
Nov 12, 2016 01:37 AM
—
filed under:
Human Rights,
IT Act,
Big Data,
Privacy,
Internet Governance,
Smart Cities,
Data Protection,
Information Technology,
Publications
Evolving data science, technologies, techniques, and practices, including big data, are enabling shifts in how the public and private sectors carry out their functions and responsibilities, deliver services, and facilitate innovative production and service models to emerge. In this compilation we have put together a series of articles that we have developed as we explore the impacts – positive and negative – of big data. This is a growing body of research that we are exploring and
is relevant to multiple areas of our work including privacy and surveillance. Feedback and comments on the compilation are welcome and appreciated.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Beyond the PDP Bill: Governance Choices for the DPA
-
by
Trishi Jindal and S.Vivek
—
published
Dec 31, 2020
—
last modified
Nov 10, 2021 07:32 AM
—
filed under:
Internet Governance,
Data Protection,
Privacy
This article examines the specific governance choices the Data Protection Authority (DPA) in India must deliberate on vis-à-vis its standard-setting function, which are distinct from those it will encounter as part of its enforcement and supervision functions.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Comments on the Statistical Disclosure Control Report
-
by
Srinivs Kodali and Amber Sinha
—
published
May 02, 2017
—
last modified
Mar 13, 2019 12:28 AM
—
filed under:
Call for Comments,
Digital Access,
Open Data,
Open Government Data,
Data Protection,
Data Governance,
Aadhaar,
Digitisation,
Information Security,
Openness,
Internet Governance,
Data Management
This submission presents comments by the Centre for Internet and Society, India (“CIS”) on the Statistical Disclosure Control Report published on March 30th by Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation.
Located in
Internet Governance
-
The Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Demanding your Data
-
by
Rekha Jain
—
published
Nov 10, 2020
—
filed under:
Internet Governance,
Data Protection,
Artificial Intelligence
The increasing digitalization of the economy and ubiquity of the Internet, coupled with developments in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) has given rise to transformational business models across several sectors.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
The PDP Bill 2019 Through the Lens of Privacy by Design
-
by
Saumyaa Naidu, Akash Sheshadri, Shweta Mohandas, and Pranav M Bidare; Edited by Arindrajit Basu, Shweta Reddy; With inputs from Amber Sinha
—
published
Nov 12, 2020
—
last modified
Nov 13, 2020 07:51 AM
—
filed under:
Design,
Internet Governance,
Data Protection,
Privacy
This paper evaluates the PDP Bill based on the Privacy by Design approach. It examines the implications of Bill in terms of the data ecosystem it may lead to, and the visual interface design in digital platforms. This paper focuses on the notice and consent communication suggested by the Bill, and the role and accountability of design in its interpretation.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
