-
Statutory Motion Against Intermediary Guidelines Rules
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Mar 26, 2012
—
last modified
Apr 03, 2012 09:35 AM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Parliament,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Intermediary Liability,
Censorship
Rajya Sabha MP, Shri P. Rajeev has moved a motion that the much-criticised Intermediary Guidelines Rules be annulled.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
How India Makes E-books Easier to Ban than Books (And How We Can Change That)
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Jan 24, 2012
—
last modified
Feb 21, 2012 11:50 AM
—
filed under:
Obscenity,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Featured,
Intermediary Liability,
Censorship
Without getting into questions of what should and should not be unlawful speech, Pranesh Prakash chooses to take a look at how Indian law promotes arbitrary removal and blocking of websites, website content, and online services, and how it makes it much easier than getting offline printed speech removed.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Invisible Censorship: How the Government Censors Without Being Seen
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Dec 14, 2011
—
last modified
Jan 04, 2012 08:59 AM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Google,
Access to Knowledge,
Social media,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Intermediary Liability,
Featured,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
The Indian government wants to censor the Internet without being seen to be censoring the Internet. This article by Pranesh Prakash shows how the government has been able to achieve this through the Information Technology Act and the Intermediary Guidelines Rules it passed in April 2011. It now wants methods of censorship that leave even fewer traces, which is why Mr. Kapil Sibal, Union Minister for Communications and Information Technology talks of Internet 'self-regulation', and has brought about an amendment of the Copyright Act that requires instant removal of content.
Located in
Internet Governance
-
Press Coverage of Online Censorship Row
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Dec 08, 2011
—
last modified
Dec 08, 2011 11:31 AM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Links,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Facebook,
Intermediary Liability,
Censorship
We are maintaining a rolling blog with press references to the row created by the proposal by the Union Minister for Communications and Information Technology to pre-screen user-generated Internet content.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Online Pre-Censorship is Harmful and Impractical
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Dec 07, 2011
—
last modified
Dec 12, 2011 05:00 PM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Obscenity,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Public Accountability,
YouTube,
Social media,
Internet Governance,
Featured,
Intermediary Liability,
Censorship,
Social Networking
The Union Minister for Communications and Information Technology, Mr. Kapil Sibal wants Internet intermediaries to pre-censor content uploaded by their users. Pranesh Prakash takes issue with this and explains why this is a problem, even if the government's heart is in the right place. Further, he points out that now is the time to take action on the draconian IT Rules which are before the Parliament.
Located in
Internet Governance
-
Don't Shoot the Messenger: Speech on Intermediary Liability at 22nd SCCR of WIPO
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Jul 08, 2011
—
last modified
Jun 01, 2012 03:01 PM
—
filed under:
Intermediary Liability,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Copyright,
Access to Knowledge
This is a speech made by Pranesh Prakash at an side-event co-organized by the World Intellectual Property Organization and the Internet Society on intermediary liability, to coincide with the release of Prof. Lillian Edwards's WIPO-commissioned report on 'Role and Responsibility of the Internet Intermediaries in the Field of Copyright'.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Killing the Internet Softly with Its Rules
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
May 25, 2011
—
last modified
Aug 20, 2011 12:51 PM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Internet Governance,
Intermediary Liability
While regulation of the Internet is a necessity, the Department of IT, through recent Rules under the IT Act, is guilty of over-regulation. This over-regulation is not only a bad idea, but is unconstitutional, and gravely endangers freedom of speech and privacy online.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Rebuttal of DIT's Misleading Statements on New Internet Rules
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
May 13, 2011
—
last modified
Jul 11, 2012 01:18 PM
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
IT Act,
Featured,
Intermediary Liability
The press statement issued on May 11 by the Department of Information Technology (DIT) on the furore over the newly-issued rules on 'intermediary due diligence' is misleading and is, in places, plainly false. We are presenting a point-by-point rebuttal of the DIT's claims.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
CIS Para-wise Comments on Intermediary Due Diligence Rules, 2011
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Feb 25, 2011
—
last modified
Jul 11, 2012 10:27 AM
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
IT Act,
Intermediary Liability
On February 7th 2011, the Department of Information Technology, MCIT published draft rules on its website (The Information Technology (Due diligence observed by intermediaries guidelines) Rules, 2011) in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 87(2)(zg), read with Section 79(2) of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Comments were invited from the public before February 25th 2011. Accordingly, Privacy India and Centre for Internet and Society, Bangalore have prepared the following para-wise comments for the Ministry’s consideration.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
New Release of IPR Chapter of India-EU Free Trade Agreement
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Jan 12, 2011
—
last modified
Sep 22, 2011 12:34 PM
—
filed under:
Access to Medicine,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Intermediary Liability,
Access to Knowledge
A draft of the IPR chapter of the EU-India FTA, made publicly available now for the first time, provides insight into India's response in July 2010 to several EU proposals on intellectual property protection and enforcement.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs