-
Should the censors tighten Savita Bhabhi’s hook?*
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
May 02, 2012
—
last modified
May 02, 2012 06:31 AM
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Censorship
"Should the censors tighten Savita Bhabhi's hook, asks a blog entry published in Churumuri on May 1, 2012.
Located in
News & Media
-
Chilling Effects and Frozen Words
-
by
Lawrence Liang
—
published
Apr 30, 2012
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Public Accountability,
Internet Governance,
Intermediary Liability,
Censorship
What if the real danger is not that we lose our freedom of speech and expression but our sense of humour as a nation? Lawrence Liang's op-ed was published in the Hindu on April 30, 2012.
Located in
Internet Governance
-
Intermediary Liability in India: Chilling Effects on Free Expression on the Internet
-
by
Rishabh Dara
—
published
Apr 27, 2012
—
last modified
Dec 14, 2012 10:22 AM
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Public Accountability,
Internet Governance,
Research,
Featured,
Intermediary Liability,
Censorship
The Centre for Internet & Society in partnership with Google India conducted the Google Policy Fellowship 2011. This was offered for the first time in Asia Pacific as well as in India. Rishabh Dara was selected as a Fellow and researched upon issues relating to freedom of expression. The results of the paper demonstrate that the ‘Information Technology (Intermediaries Guidelines) Rules 2011’ notified by the Government of India on April 11, 2011 have a chilling effect on free expression.
Located in
Internet Governance
-
Social Media 1, Indian Government 0
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Apr 26, 2012
—
last modified
Apr 27, 2012 04:44 AM
—
filed under:
Internet Governance,
Censorship
The futility of the Indian government’s attempts to control what is posted on Facebook, YouTube and other social media sites was thrown into high relief this week, after a video purportedly showing Congress spokesman Abhishek Manu Singvi having sex in his office resulted in his resignation.
Located in
News & Media
-
India's Broken Internet Laws Need a Shot of Multi-stakeholderism
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Apr 26, 2012
—
last modified
Apr 26, 2012 01:45 PM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Encryption,
Intermediary Liability,
Facebook,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
Cyber-laws in India are severely flawed, with neither lawyers nor technologists being able to understand them, and the Cyber-Law Group in DEIT being incapable of framing fair, just, and informed laws and policies. Pranesh Prakash suggests they learn from the DEIT's Internet Governance Division, and Brazil, and adopt multi-stakeholderism as a core principle of Internet policy-making.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Private sector censors
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Apr 26, 2012
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Public Accountability,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
If business decides what’s ‘good’ and ‘bad’ speech, it can lead to multiple interpretations and arbitrary decisions. The article by Salil Tripathi was published in LiveMint on April 25, 2012.
Located in
News & Media
-
Views | Why the Left may for once be right
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Apr 25, 2012
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Public Accountability,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
On the opening day of the upcoming parliamentary session on Tuesday, the Rajya Sabha is set to vote on an annulment motion against the IT rules, moved by P. Rajeeve of the Communist Party of India (Marxist).
Located in
News & Media
-
Campaign against curbs on websites gathers steam
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Apr 25, 2012
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Public Accountability,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
For political cartoonist Aseem Trivedi and his blogger-cum-journalist friend Alok Dixit, who both ran a website against corruption, a tryst with the blind side of law triggered their mission against “gagging” of the new-age Indian Internet user.
Located in
News & Media
-
Expect anti-net censorship echo in house
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Apr 25, 2012
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Public Accountability,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
For the anti-Internet censorship movement in the country, hope is now in sight. Their fight against the intermediary provisions (section 79) of the IT laws, according to which, an intermediary (website, domain owner) would have to take off content that a third party (or complainant) finds ‘objectionable,’ without any room for appeal, has now garnered the attention of the government itself. What is at stake is our fundamental rights, warns CPM Member of Parliament P Rajeeve, who was perhaps the first at the government level to realise that there was a gaping hole in the provision, and took up the matter in the Rajya Sabha.
Located in
News & Media
-
Mobilising support for freedom on the Web
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Apr 25, 2012
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Public Accountability,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
A motion in the Rajya Sabha has sought annulment of the IT intermediary guidelines, writes Deepa Kurup in this article published in the Hindu on April 22, 2012.
Located in
News & Media