-
Press Coverage of Online Censorship Row
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Dec 08, 2011
—
last modified
Dec 08, 2011 11:31 AM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Links,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Facebook,
Intermediary Liability,
Censorship
We are maintaining a rolling blog with press references to the row created by the proposal by the Union Minister for Communications and Information Technology to pre-screen user-generated Internet content.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Overview of the Constitutional Challenges to the IT Act
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Dec 15, 2014
—
last modified
Dec 19, 2014 09:01 AM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Court Case,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Intermediary Liability,
Constitutional Law,
Censorship,
Section 66A,
Article 19(1)(a),
Blocking
There are currently ten cases before the Supreme Court challenging various provisions of the Information Technology Act, the rules made under that, and other laws, that are being heard jointly. Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan who's arguing Anoop M.K. v. Union of India has put together this chart that helps you track what's being challenged in each case.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
National Consultation on Media Law
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Sep 30, 2014
—
filed under:
Internet Governance,
Intermediary Liability,
Privacy
The Law Commission of India and the National University, Delhi have joined hands to organize the National Consultation on Media Law at the India Habitat Centre in New Delhi on September 27 and 28, 2014. Nehaa Chaudhari participated in this event.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
News & Media
-
Finding Needles in Haystacks - Discussing the Role of Automated Filtering in the New Indian Intermediary Liability Rules
-
by
Shweta Mohandas and Torsha Sarkar
—
published
Aug 03, 2021
—
last modified
Aug 03, 2021 07:28 AM
—
filed under:
Internet Governance,
Intermediary Liability,
Artificial Intelligence
On the 25th of February this year The Government of India notified the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021. The new Rules broaden the scope of which entities can be considered as intermediaries to now include curated-content platforms (Netflix) as well as digital news publications. This blogpost analyzes the rule on automated filtering, in the context of the growing use of automated content moderation.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
India ranks second globally in accessing private details of users
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Nov 19, 2012
—
filed under:
Internet Governance,
Intermediary Liability,
Privacy
According to the latest transparency report released by Google, India ranks second in the world for accessing private details of its citizens, only after the U.S. The Google report lists out requests it received from governments across the world to access details of users of its various services.
Located in
News & Media
-
Government asks Twitter to block fake 'PMO India' accounts; site fails to respond
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Aug 22, 2012
—
last modified
Sep 04, 2012 12:24 PM
—
filed under:
Social media,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Public Accountability,
Internet Governance,
Intermediary Liability,
Censorship
A standoff between the government and microblogging service Twitter, that has got India's online community up in arms, continues, as Twitter is still to act on India's requests to block some of the fake 'PMO India' accounts.
Located in
News & Media
-
Intermediary Liability & Freedom of Expression — Executive Summary
-
by
Rishabh Dara
—
published
Sep 14, 2012
—
last modified
Apr 24, 2016 11:54 AM
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Intermediary Liability
This document provides a critique of “The Information Technology (Intermediaries Guidelines) Rules 2011 and proposes an alternate set of Rules.
Located in
Internet Governance
-
Content takedown and users' rights
-
by
Torsha Sarkar, Gurshabad Grover
—
published
Feb 14, 2020
—
last modified
Feb 17, 2020 05:18 AM
—
filed under:
Internet Freedom,
Internet Governance,
Intermediary Liability,
Censorship
After Shreya Singhal v Union of India, commentators have continued to question the constitutionality of the content takedown regime under Section 69A of the IT Act (and the Blocking Rules issued under it). There has also been considerable debate around how the judgement has changed this regime: specifically about (i) whether originators of content are entitled to a hearing, (ii) whether Rule 16 of the Blocking Rules, which mandates confidentiality of content takedown requests received by intermediaries from the Government, continues to be operative, and (iii) the effect of Rule 16 on the rights of the originator and the public to challenge executive action. In this opinion piece, we attempt to answer some of these questions.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Indian Intermediary Liability Regime: Compliance with the Manila Principles on Intermediary Liability
-
by
Divij Joshi
—
published
May 20, 2018
—
last modified
May 20, 2018 03:14 PM
—
filed under:
Internet Governance,
Intermediary Liability,
Privacy
This report assesses the compliance of the Indian intermediary liability framework with the Manila Principles on Intermediary Liability, and recommends substantive legislative changes to bring the legal framework in line with the Manila Principles.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Inter Movements Open Forum: Trafficking Bill
-
by
Admin
—
published
May 25, 2018
—
last modified
Aug 18, 2018 09:21 AM
—
filed under:
Internet Governance,
Intermediary Liability
On 18 May 2018 Gurshabad Grover on behalf of CIS presented comments on the Trafficking (Prevention, Protection and Rehabilitation) Bill 2018 at a meeting of the Inter Movements Open Forum jointly organised by Sangram, Naz Foundation, NNSW, Tarshi and VAMP. The meeting was held at India International Centre in New Delhi.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
News & Media