-
Breaking Down Section 66A of the IT Act
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Nov 25, 2012
—
last modified
Dec 14, 2012 09:51 AM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Public Accountability,
Internet Governance,
Featured,
Homepage
Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, which prescribes 'punishment for sending offensive messages through communication service, etc.' is widely held by lawyers and legal academics to be unconstitutional. In this post Pranesh Prakash explores why that section is unconstitutional, how it came to be, the state of the law elsewhere, and how we can move forward.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Online Censorship: How Government should Approach Regulation of Speech
-
by
Sunil Abraham
—
published
Dec 05, 2012
—
filed under:
Social Media,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Public Accountability,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
Why is there a constant brouhaha in India about online censorship? What must be done to address this?
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Facebook, Google deny spying access
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Jun 09, 2013
—
last modified
Jul 02, 2013 10:18 AM
—
filed under:
Privacy,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Public Accountability,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
The CEOs of Facebook and Google on Saturday categorically denied that the US National Security Agency had "direct access" to their company servers for snooping on Gmail and Facebook users. But both acknowledged that the companies complied with the 'lawful' requests made by the US government and shared user data with sleuths.
Located in
News & Media
-
Analysis of the Copyright (Amendment) Bill, 2010
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Jul 18, 2010
—
last modified
Sep 21, 2011 06:01 AM
—
filed under:
Access to Knowledge,
Consumer Rights,
Copyright,
Fair Dealings,
Public Accountability,
Intellectual Property Rights,
RTI,
Featured,
Broadcasting,
Publications,
Submissions,
Technological Protection Measures
CIS analyses the Copyright (Amendment) Bill, 2010, from a public interest perspective to sift the good from the bad, and importantly to point out what crucial amendments should be considered but have not been so far.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Debate on Section 66A rages on
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Dec 10, 2012
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Internet Governance,
Public Accountability
Last week, a reputed BPO in Chennai took down its Facebook page and introduced stricter moderation for posts on its bulletin board.
Located in
News & Media
-
Contestations of Data, ECJ Safe Harbor Ruling and Lessons for India
-
by
Jyoti Panday
—
published
Oct 14, 2015
—
filed under:
Access to Knowledge,
Digital Economy,
Public Accountability,
Privacy,
Platform Responsibility,
Data Protection,
Accountability,
Digital Security,
Digital India,
Internet Governance
The European Court of Justice has invalidated a European Commission decision, which had previously concluded that the 'Safe Harbour Privacy Principles' provide adequate protections for European citizens’ privacy rights for the transfer of personal data between European Union and United States. The inadequacies of the framework is not news for the European Commission and action by ECJ has been a long time coming. The ruling raises important questions about how the claims of citizenship are being negotiated in the context of the internet, and how increasingly the contestations of personal data are being employed in the discourse.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Mobilising support for freedom on the Web
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Apr 25, 2012
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Public Accountability,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
A motion in the Rajya Sabha has sought annulment of the IT intermediary guidelines, writes Deepa Kurup in this article published in the Hindu on April 22, 2012.
Located in
News & Media
-
Expect anti-net censorship echo in house
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Apr 25, 2012
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Public Accountability,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
For the anti-Internet censorship movement in the country, hope is now in sight. Their fight against the intermediary provisions (section 79) of the IT laws, according to which, an intermediary (website, domain owner) would have to take off content that a third party (or complainant) finds ‘objectionable,’ without any room for appeal, has now garnered the attention of the government itself. What is at stake is our fundamental rights, warns CPM Member of Parliament P Rajeeve, who was perhaps the first at the government level to realise that there was a gaping hole in the provision, and took up the matter in the Rajya Sabha.
Located in
News & Media
-
Campaign against curbs on websites gathers steam
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Apr 25, 2012
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Public Accountability,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
For political cartoonist Aseem Trivedi and his blogger-cum-journalist friend Alok Dixit, who both ran a website against corruption, a tryst with the blind side of law triggered their mission against “gagging” of the new-age Indian Internet user.
Located in
News & Media
-
Round Table on Assessing the Efficacy of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) for Public Initiatives: A Report
-
by
Sanchia de Souza
—
published
Jun 24, 2009
—
last modified
Aug 20, 2011 10:28 PM
—
filed under:
Social media,
Digital Activism,
Digital Access,
Public Accountability,
Discussion,
Featured,
Transparency, Politics
Zainab Bawa reports on the Round Table on Assessing the Efficacy of Information and Communication Technologies for Public Initiatives, hosted by the Centre for Internet and Society, Bangalore, on 17 June 2009, in collaboration with the Liberty Institute, New Delhi.
Located in
Events
/
Event Blogs
