-
Comment by CIS at ACE on Presentation on French Charter on the Fight against Cyber-Counterfeiting
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Dec 01, 2011
—
last modified
Dec 01, 2011 11:59 AM
—
filed under:
Access to Knowledge,
Copyright,
Privacy,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Piracy,
Censorship,
WIPO
The seventh session of the World Intellectual Property Organization's Advisory Committee on Enforcement is being held in Geneva on November 30 and December 1, 2011. Pranesh Prakash responded to a presentation by Prof. Pierre Sirinelli of the École de droit de la Sorbonne, Université Paris 1 on 'The French Charter on the Fight against Cyber-Counterfeiting of December 16, 2009' with this comment.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Calling Out the BSA on Its BS
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Sep 09, 2011
—
last modified
Sep 14, 2011 06:16 PM
—
filed under:
Piracy,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Access to Knowledge
The Business Software Alliance (BSA) is trying to pull wool over government officials' eyes by equating software piracy with tax losses. Pranesh Prakash points out how that argument lacks cogency, and that tax losses would be better averted if BSA's constituent companies just decided to pay full taxes in India.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Analysis of the Copyright (Amendment) Bill 2012
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
May 23, 2012
—
last modified
Nov 12, 2013 02:13 PM
—
filed under:
Access to Knowledge,
Fair Dealings,
Piracy,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Economics,
Intermediary Liability,
Featured,
Technological Protection Measures
There are some welcome provisions in the Copyright (Amendment) Bill 2012, and some worrisome provisions. Pranesh Prakash examines five positive changes, four negative ones, and notes the several missed opportunities. The larger concern, though, is that many important issues have not been addressed by these amendments, and how copyright policy is made without evidence and often out of touch with contemporary realities of the digital era.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
The Future of the Moving Image
-
by
Nishant Shah
—
published
Nov 10, 2008
—
last modified
Nov 11, 2008 09:06 AM
—
filed under:
internet and society,
Piracy,
Intellectual Property Rights,
YouTube,
internet art,
Cybercultures,
New Pedagogies
All dissimilar technologies are the same in their own way, but all similar technologies are uniquely different. This was probably at the core of the zeitgeist at the international seminar on “The Future of Celluloid” hosted by the Media Lab at the Jadavpur University, Kolkata, at which Nishant Shah, Director - Research CIS, presented a research paper. Practitioners, film makers, artists, theoreticians and academics, blurring the boundaries of both their roles and their disciplines and areas of interest, came together to move beyond convergence theories – to explore the continuities, conflations, contestations and confusions that Internet Technologies have led to for earlier technologies, but specifically for the technology of the moving image.
Located in
Research
/
Conferences & Workshops
/
Conference Blogs
-
Entertainment industry and Internet piracy in focus
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Sep 17, 2012
—
filed under:
Piracy,
Copyright,
Access to Knowledge
The first-of-its-kind initiative by the anti-piracy cell of the Kerala Police to register cases against 1,010 Internet users for uploading or downloading the Malayalam film Bachelor Party has sparked a debate between social media experts and legal puritans on what the law actually says.
Located in
News & Media
-
Twists and turns of the SOPA opera
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Jan 16, 2012
—
filed under:
Piracy,
Intellectual Property Rights
Proposed DNS filtering threatens the core protocol on which the Internet's universality depends, writes Deepa Kurup in this article published in the Hindu on 15 January 2012. Sunil Abraham is quoted in this.
Located in
News & Media
-
Can Judges Order ISPs to Block Websites for Copyright Infringement? (Part 1)
-
by
Ananth Padmanabhan
—
published
Jan 30, 2014
—
last modified
Jan 31, 2014 06:00 AM
—
filed under:
Piracy,
Copyright,
Access to Knowledge
In a three-part study, Ananth Padmanabhan examines the "John Doe" orders that courts have passed against ISPs, which entertainment companies have used to block dozens, if not hundreds, of websites. In this part, he looks at the theory behind John Doe orders and finds that it would be wrong for Indian courts to grant "John Doe" orders against ISPs.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Can Judges Order ISPs to Block Websites for Copyright Infringement? (Part 2)
-
by
Ananth Padmanabhan
—
published
Feb 05, 2014
—
last modified
Mar 06, 2014 04:48 PM
—
filed under:
Access to Knowledge,
Copyright,
Piracy,
Featured,
Homepage
In a three-part study, Ananth Padmanabhan examines the "John Doe" orders that courts have passed against ISPs, which entertainment companies have used to block dozens, if not hundreds, of websites. In this, the second part, he looks at the law laid down by the U.S. Supreme Court and the Delhi High Court on secondary and contributory copyright infringement, and finds that those wouldn't allow Indian courts to grant "John Doe" orders against ISPs.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Recommendations for the Covid Vaccine Intelligence Network (Co-Win) platform
-
by
Pallavi Bedi
—
published
Mar 25, 2021
—
last modified
Mar 25, 2021 01:14 PM
—
filed under:
Aarogya Setu,
Health Tech,
Piracy,
internet governance,
Healthcare,
e-Governance
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog