-
IANA Transition: Suggestions for Process Design
-
by
Smarika Kumar
—
published
Jun 22, 2014
—
filed under:
ICANN,
IANA Transition,
Internet Governance,
Transparency and Accountability
With analysis of community-input and ICANN processes, Smarika Kumar offers concrete suggestions for process design. She urges the Indian government to take a stronger position in matters of IANA transition.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
CIS Policy Brief: IANA Transition Fundamentals & Suggestions for Process Design
-
by
Geetha Hariharan
—
published
Jun 22, 2014
—
last modified
Jul 08, 2014 08:39 AM
—
filed under:
ICANN,
IANA Transition,
Internet Governance
In March 2014, the US government announced that it would transfer oversight of IANA functions to an as-yet-indeterminate global multi-stakeholder body. This policy brief, written by Smarika Kumar and Geetha Hariharan, explains the process concisely.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Understanding IANA Stewardship Transition
-
by
Smarika Kumar
—
published
Jun 22, 2014
—
last modified
Jun 22, 2014 03:23 AM
—
filed under:
NTIA Announcement,
ICANN,
IANA Transition,
Internet Governance
Smarika Kumar describes the process of the IANA stewardship transition, and enumerates what the NTIA announcement does and does not do.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Do we need a Unified Post Transition IANA?
-
by
Pranesh Prakash, Padmini Baruah and Jyoti Panday
—
published
Oct 23, 2015
—
last modified
Oct 27, 2015 12:46 AM
—
filed under:
IANA,
Internet Governance,
IANA Transition
As we stand at the threshold of the IANA Transition, we at CIS find that there has been little discussion on the question of how the transition will manifest. The question we wanted to raise was whether there is any merit in dividing the three IANA functions – names, numbers and protocols – given that there is no real technical stability to be gained from a unified Post Transition IANA. The analysis of this idea has been detailed below.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
IANA Transition Stewardship & ICANN Accountability (II)
-
by
Jyoti Panday
—
published
Jun 21, 2015
—
last modified
Jul 31, 2015 03:47 PM
—
filed under:
ICANN,
IANA Transition,
Internet Governance
This paper is the second in a multi-part series, in which we provide an overview of submitted proposals and highlight areas of concern that will need attention moving forward. The series is a work in progress and will be updated as the processes move forward. It is up for public comments and we welcome your feedback.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Jurisdiction: The Taboo Topic at ICANN
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Jun 27, 2016
—
last modified
Jun 29, 2016 07:51 AM
—
filed under:
IANA,
Internet Governance,
Featured,
ICANN,
IANA Transition
The "IANA Transition" that is currently underway is a sham since it doesn't address the most important question: that of jurisdiction. This article explores why the issue of jurisdiction is the most important question, and why it remains unaddressed.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Submission by the Centre for Internet and Society on Revisions to ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior
-
by
Vidushi Marda
—
published
Jun 29, 2016
—
last modified
Jun 30, 2016 06:07 AM
—
filed under:
Public Accountability,
Internet Governance,
Featured,
ICANN,
IANA Transition,
Homepage
Prepared by Vidushi Marda, with inputs from Dr. Nirmita Narasimhan and Sunil Abraham.
Located in
Internet Governance