-
If the DIDP Did Its Job
-
by
Asvatha Babu
—
published
Nov 03, 2016
—
last modified
Nov 07, 2016 12:57 PM
—
filed under:
IANA,
Transparency and Accountability,
Internet Governance,
ICANN,
IANA Transition,
Transparency
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
IANA Transition Stewardship & ICANN Accountability (I)
-
by
Jyoti Panday
—
published
Jun 20, 2015
—
last modified
Jul 31, 2015 02:56 PM
—
filed under:
ICANN,
IANA,
Internet Governance,
IANA Transition
This paper is the first in a multi-part series, in which we provide a background to the IANA transition and updates on the ensuing processes. An attempt to familiarise people with the issues at stake, this paper will be followed by a second piece that provides an overview of submitted proposals and areas of concern that will need attention moving forward. The series is a work in progress and will be updated as the processes move forward. It is up for public comments and we welcome your feedback.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Revolving Door Analysis: IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group
-
by
Lakshmi Venkataraman
—
published
Dec 10, 2014
—
last modified
Dec 16, 2014 05:44 AM
—
filed under:
ICANN,
IANA Transition
The IANA Stewardship Coordination Group (ICG) is the body that will accept and coordinate different proposals for IANA transition. It will make the global Internet community's final proposal for transition to the NTIA. Lakshmi Venkataraman finds that a majority of the ICG's membership have had longstanding affiliations with I-star organisations. What will this mean for IANA transition?
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
ICANN accountability, IANA transition and open questions
-
by
Geetha Hariharan
—
published
Feb 06, 2015
—
filed under:
ICANN,
IANA Transition
On February 3, 2015, the Centre for Communication Governance (NLU, Delhi) hosted a pre-event briefing in light of ICANN52 (Singapore, February 7-12, 2015). Geetha Hariharan attended the event.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Where Does ICANN’s Money Come From? We Asked; They Don’t Know
-
by
Geetha Hariharan
—
published
Feb 09, 2015
—
last modified
Mar 05, 2015 07:43 AM
—
filed under:
Accountability,
ICANN,
IANA Transition,
Transparency,
DIDP
Just how transparent is ICANN? How responsive are they to requests for information? At CIS, we sent ICANN ten questions seeking information about, inter alia, their revenues, commitment to the NETmundial Principles, Globalisation Advisory Groups and organisational structure. Geetha Hariharan wonders at ICANN's reluctance to respond.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
The 'Global Multistakholder Community' is Neither Global Nor Multistakeholder
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Oct 20, 2015
—
last modified
Nov 03, 2016 10:42 AM
—
filed under:
Multi-stakeholder,
ICANN,
IANA Transition,
Internet Governance
CIS research shows how Western, male, and industry-driven the IANA transition process actually is.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Comments on the Draft Outcome Document of the UN General Assembly’s Overall Review of the Implementation of WSIS Outcomes (WSIS+10)
-
by
Geetha Hariharan
—
published
Nov 18, 2015
—
last modified
Nov 18, 2015 06:33 AM
—
filed under:
ICT4D,
Call for Comments,
WSIS+10,
Access to Knowledge,
Accessibility,
Human Rights Online,
Internet Governance,
ICANN,
IANA Transition,
Open Source,
Open Access
Following the comment-period on the Zero Draft, the Draft Outcome Document of the UN General Assembly's Overall Review of implementation of WSIS Outcomes was released on 4 November 2015. Comments were sought on the Draft Outcome Document from diverse stakeholders. The Centre for Internet & Society's response to the call for comments is below.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Response by the Centre for Internet and Society to the Draft Proposal to Transition the Stewardship of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Functions from the U.S. Commerce Department’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Aug 30, 2015
—
last modified
Nov 29, 2015 06:35 AM
—
filed under:
IANA,
Internet Governance,
IANA Transition
This proposal was made to the Global Multistakeholder Community on August 9, 2015. The proposal was drafted by Pranesh Prakash and Jyoti Panday. The research assistance was provided by Padmini Baruah, Vidushi Marda, and inputs from Sunil Abraham.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
IANA Transition & ICANN Accountability Process and India' s Position
-
by
Jyoti Panday
—
published
May 30, 2015
—
last modified
Aug 23, 2015 09:26 AM
—
filed under:
ICANN,
IANA,
Internet Governance,
IANA Transition
Jyoti Panday participated in the workshop organized by CCAOI on "IANA Transition & ICANN Accountability Process and India' s Position" on May 30, 2015.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
News & Media
-
IANA Transition: A Case of the Emperor’s New Clothes?
-
by
Vidushi Marda
—
published
Oct 15, 2016
—
last modified
Nov 03, 2016 06:20 AM
—
filed under:
IANA,
Internet Governance,
IANA Transition
Transparency is key to engaging meaningfully with ICANN. CIS has filed the most number of Documentary Information Disclosure Policy (DIDP) requests with ICANN, covering a range of subjects including its relationships with contracted parties, financial disclosure, revenue statements, and harassment policies. Asvatha Babu, an intern at CIS, analysed all responses to our requests and found that only 14% of our requests were answered fully.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog