Search results

Subscribe to an always-updated RSS feed.

DIDP Request #10 - ICANN does not know how much each RIR contributes to its Budget: by Asvatha Babu — published Jul 27, 2016 — last modified Jul 27, 2016 02:57 PM — filed under: ICANN, DIDP, Internet Governance
In an effort to understand the relationship between the Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) and ICANN, we requested current and historical information on the contract fees paid by the five RIRs (AfriNIC, ARIN, APNIC, LACNIC and RIPE NCC) to ICANN annually.
Located in Internet Governance / Blog
DIDP Request #13: Keeping track of ICANN’s contracted parties: Registries: by Asvatha Babu — published Jul 28, 2016 — filed under: ICANN, DIDP, Internet Governance
On multiple occasions, Fadi Chehade, then President and CEO of ICANN has emphasized the importance of conducting audits (internal and external) to ensure compliance of ICANN’s contracted parties. At a US congressional hearing, he spoke about the contract monitoring function of ICANN.
Located in Internet Governance / Blog
DIDP Request #14: Keeping track of ICANN’s contracted parties: Registrars: by Asvatha Babu — published Jul 28, 2016 — filed under: ICANN, DIDP, Internet Governance
In September 2016, we filed two separate DIDP requests regarding ICANN’s Contractual Compliance Goals.
Located in Internet Governance / Blog
DIDP Request #15: What is going on between Verisign and ICANN?: by Asvatha Babu — published Jul 29, 2016 — filed under: ICANN, DIDP, Internet Governance
During a hearing of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on “Internet Governance Progress After ICANN 53,” President and CEO of ICANN - Mr Fadi Chehade indicated that ICANN follows up with registries and registrars on receipt of any complaint against them about violations of their contract with ICANN.
Located in Internet Governance / Blog
DIDP Request #16 - ICANN has no Documentation on Registrars’ “Abuse Contacts”: by Asvatha Babu — published Jul 29, 2016 — filed under: ICANN, DIDP, Internet Governance
Registrars on contract with ICANN are required to maintain an “abuse contact” - a 24/7 dedicated phone line and e-mail address to receive reports of abuse regarding the registered names sponsored by the registrar.
Located in Internet Governance / Blog
DIDP Request #17 - How ICANN Chooses their Contractual Compliance Auditors: by Asvatha Babu — published Jul 29, 2016 — filed under: ICANN, DIDP, Internet Governance
At a congressional hearing on internet governance and progress, then President of ICANN Fadi Chehadi indicated that the number of people working on compliance audits grew substantially—from 6 to 24 (we misquoted it as 25)— in the span of a few years.
Located in Internet Governance / Blog
DIDP Request #18 - ICANN’s Internal Website will Stay Internal: by Asvatha Babu — published Jul 29, 2016 — filed under: ICANN, DIDP, Internet Governance
ICANN maintains an internal website accessible to staff and employees. We requested ICANN to provide us with a document with the contents of that website in the interest of transparency and accountability.
Located in Internet Governance / Blog
DIDP Request #19 - ICANN’s role in the Postponement of the IANA Transition: by Asvatha Babu — published Jul 29, 2016 — filed under: ICANN, DIDP, Internet Governance
In March 2014, the National Telecommunications and Information Agency (NTIA) of the United States government announced plans to shift the Internet Assigned Names and Numbers (IANA) functions from ICANN to the global multistakeholder community. The initial deadline set for this was September 2015.
Located in Internet Governance / Blog
DIDP Request #20 - Is Presumptive Renewal of Verisign’s Contracts a Good Thing?: by Asvatha Babu — published Jul 30, 2016 — filed under: ICANN, DIDP, Internet Governance
ICANN’s contract agreements with different registries contain a presumptive renewal clause. Unless they voluntarily give up their rights or there is a material breach by the registry operator, their contract with ICANN will be automatically renewed.
Located in Internet Governance / Blog
DIDP Request #21 - ICANN’s Relationship with the RIRs: by Asvatha Babu — published Jul 30, 2016 — filed under: ICANN, DIDP, Internet Governance
At CIS, we wanted a clearer understanding of ICANN’s relationship with the 5 internet registries. The large amount contributed by the RIRs to ICANN’s funding lead us to question the nature of this relationship as well as the payment. We wrote to ICANN asking them for these details.
Located in Internet Governance / Blog

« Previous 10 items Next 7 items » 1 2 3

Support Us

Please help us defend citizen and user rights on the Internet!

You may donate online via Instamojo. Or, write a cheque in favour of ‘The Centre for Internet and Society’ and mail it to us at #32, 1st Floor, 2nd Block, Austin Town, Viveka Nagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560047. These charitable contributions will be towards the Institutional Corpus Fund of the Centre for Internet and Society.

Follow our Works

Newsletter: Subscribe

researchers@work blog: medium.com/rawblog

Twitter (CIS): @cis_india

Twitter (CIS-A2K): @cisa2k

Instagram: @cis.india

Youtube: Centre for Internet and Society

Request for Collaboration

We invite researchers, practitioners, artists, and theoreticians, both organisationally and as individuals, to engage with us on topics related internet and society, and improve our collective understanding of this field. To discuss such possibilities, please write to us at communications[at]cis-india[dot]org with an indication of the form and the content of the collaboration you might be interested in.

In general, we offer financial support for collaborative/invited works only through public calls.

About Us

The Centre for Internet and Society (CIS) is a non-profit organisation that undertakes interdisciplinary research on internet and digital technologies from policy and academic perspectives. The areas of focus include digital accessibility for persons with disabilities, access to knowledge, intellectual property rights, openness (including open data, free and open source software, open standards, open access, open educational resources, and open video), internet governance, telecommunication reform, digital privacy, and cyber-security. The research at CIS seeks to understand the reconfiguration of social processes and structures through the internet and digital media technologies, and vice versa.

Through its diverse initiatives, CIS explores, intervenes in, and advances contemporary discourse and regulatory practices around internet, technology, and society in India, and elsewhere.

© Centre for Internet & Society

Unless otherwise specified, content licensed under Creative Commons — Attribution 3.0 Unported.