-
The 2010 Special 301 Report Is More of the Same, Slightly Less Shrill
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
May 13, 2010
—
last modified
Oct 03, 2011 05:37 AM
—
filed under:
Development,
Consumer Rights,
Access to Knowledge,
Copyright,
Piracy,
Access to Medicine,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Data Protection,
FLOSS,
Technological Protection Measures,
Publications
Pranesh Prakash examines the numerous flaws in the Special 301 from the Indian perspective, to come to the conclusion that the Indian government should openly refuse to acknowledge such a flawed report. He notes that the Consumers International survey, to which CIS contributed the India report, serves as an effective counter to the Special 301 report.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Civil Society Letter Against TRIPS-Plus IP Enforcement
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Aug 18, 2009
—
last modified
Sep 22, 2011 12:48 PM
—
filed under:
Access to Medicine,
Consumer Rights,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Access to Knowledge
This open letter was sent to the president of Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) and high-level government officials on the eve of the Third International Conference on Counterfeiting & Piracy organized by CII. This conference aims to strengthen the enforcement of intellectual property rights and thus creating an imbalance in the protection that intellectual property offers to both those who own it as well as those who don't.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
New Release of IPR Chapter of India-EU Free Trade Agreement
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Jan 12, 2011
—
last modified
Sep 22, 2011 12:34 PM
—
filed under:
Access to Medicine,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Intermediary Liability,
Access to Knowledge
A draft of the IPR chapter of the EU-India FTA, made publicly available now for the first time, provides insight into India's response in July 2010 to several EU proposals on intellectual property protection and enforcement.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
International treaty to make books accessible to the blind
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Dec 21, 2012
—
filed under:
Access to Medicine,
Access to Knowledge,
WIPO
It would make it legal to send accessible books across borders.
Located in
News & Media
-
Inquilab 2.0? Reflections on Online Activism in India*
-
by
Nishant Shah
—
published
Jan 13, 2010
—
last modified
Aug 02, 2011 09:25 AM
—
filed under:
histories of internet in India,
Social media,
Digital Activism,
Cyberspace,
Access to Medicine,
internet and society,
Research,
Cybercultures
Research and activism on the Internet in India remain fledgling in spite the media hype, says Anja Kovacs in her blog post that charts online activism in India as it has emerged.
Located in
RAW
/
…
/
Blogs
/
Revolution 2.0?
-
Resources
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Oct 20, 2009
—
last modified
Oct 20, 2009 03:29 AM
—
filed under:
Bayh-Dole,
Access to Knowledge,
Access to Medicine,
Open Access,
Public Accountability,
Open Innovation
A collection of resources that will help one navigate through the arguments and evidence for and against the Indian "Bayh-Dole" bill.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Publications
/
PUPFIP Bill
-
Arguments Against the PUPFIP Bill
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Oct 20, 2009
—
last modified
Sep 12, 2011 11:03 AM
—
filed under:
Bayh-Dole,
Access to Knowledge,
Access to Medicine,
Intellectual Property Rights,
PUPFIP,
Patents,
Publications
The Protection and Utilisation of Public Funded Intellectual Property Bill (PUPFIP Bill) is a new legislation being considered by Parliament, which was introduced in the 2008 winter session of the Rajya Sabha. It is modelled on the American Bayh-Dole Act (University and Small Business Patent Procedures Act) of 1980. On this page, we explore some of the reasons that the bill is unnecessary, and how it will be harmful if passed.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Publications
/
PUPFIP Bill
