-
Breaking Down Section 66A of the IT Act
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Nov 25, 2012
—
last modified
Dec 14, 2012 09:51 AM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Public Accountability,
Internet Governance,
Featured,
Homepage
Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, which prescribes 'punishment for sending offensive messages through communication service, etc.' is widely held by lawyers and legal academics to be unconstitutional. In this post Pranesh Prakash explores why that section is unconstitutional, how it came to be, the state of the law elsewhere, and how we can move forward.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
IJLT-CIS Law Essay Competition
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Dec 01, 2009
—
last modified
Aug 04, 2011 04:35 AM
—
filed under:
Intellectual Property Rights,
Competition
The Indian Journal of Law and Technology and CIS are conducting a legal essay competition to encourage law students across India to think critically about the techno-legal issues facing us today. Students can write on any of the four themes, with the top prize being Rs. 7500 and an internship at CIS.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
CIS Statement on the WIPO Broadcast Treaty at SCCR 19
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Feb 01, 2010
—
last modified
Feb 01, 2012 09:07 AM
—
filed under:
Intellectual Property Rights,
Broadcasting,
WIPO
This statement on the WIPO Broadcast Treaty was delivered on December 17, 2010 at the 19th session of the Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights by Nirmita Narasimhan on behalf of CIS.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Arguments Against Software Patents in India
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Feb 22, 2010
—
last modified
Mar 13, 2012 10:43 AM
—
filed under:
Open Standards,
Access to Knowledge,
Software Patents,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Publications,
Patents
CIS believes that software patents are harmful for the software industry and for consumers. In this post, Pranesh Prakash looks at the philosophical, legal and practical reasons for holding such a position in India. This is a slightly modified version of a presentation made by Pranesh Prakash at the iTechLaw conference in Bangalore on February 5, 2010, as part of a panel discussing software patents in India, the United States, and the European Union.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Technological Protection Measures in the Copyright (Amendment) Bill, 2010
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Apr 28, 2010
—
last modified
May 17, 2012 04:51 PM
—
filed under:
Access to Knowledge,
Copyright,
Intellectual Property Rights,
FLOSS,
Technological Protection Measures,
Publications
In this post Pranesh Prakash conducts a legal exegesis of section 65A of the Copyright (Amendment) Bill, 2010, which deals with the stuff that enables 'Digital Rights/Restrictions Management', i.e., Technological Protection Measures. He notes that while the provision avoids some mistakes of the American law, it still poses grave problems to consumers, and that there are many uncertainties in it still.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
The 2010 Special 301 Report Is More of the Same, Slightly Less Shrill
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
May 13, 2010
—
last modified
Oct 03, 2011 05:37 AM
—
filed under:
Development,
Consumer Rights,
Access to Knowledge,
Copyright,
Piracy,
Access to Medicine,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Data Protection,
FLOSS,
Technological Protection Measures,
Publications
Pranesh Prakash examines the numerous flaws in the Special 301 from the Indian perspective, to come to the conclusion that the Indian government should openly refuse to acknowledge such a flawed report. He notes that the Consumers International survey, to which CIS contributed the India report, serves as an effective counter to the Special 301 report.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Analysis of the Copyright (Amendment) Bill, 2010
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Jul 18, 2010
—
last modified
Sep 21, 2011 06:01 AM
—
filed under:
Access to Knowledge,
Consumer Rights,
Copyright,
Fair Dealings,
Public Accountability,
Intellectual Property Rights,
RTI,
Featured,
Broadcasting,
Publications,
Submissions,
Technological Protection Measures
CIS analyses the Copyright (Amendment) Bill, 2010, from a public interest perspective to sift the good from the bad, and importantly to point out what crucial amendments should be considered but have not been so far.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Lecture by Eben Moglen and Mishi Choudhary
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Dec 13, 2008
—
last modified
Aug 23, 2011 02:55 AM
—
filed under:
Intellectual Property Rights,
Software Patents,
Access to Knowledge
The Software Freedom Law Center, National Law School, and the Centre for Internet and Society organised a lecture by Mishi Choudhary and Eben Moglen for students of NLS on Saturday, December 13, 2008.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
WIPO Broadcast Treaty and Webcasting
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
May 25, 2009
—
last modified
Aug 04, 2011 04:42 AM
—
filed under:
Intellectual Property Rights,
Broadcasting,
WIPO
On Friday, 8 May 2009, at Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting held a stakeholders' briefing meeting on the Broadcast Treaty that has been on the table at the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO). The purpose of that meeting was to inform the relevant stakeholders of the developments in Geneva, as well as to garner input from them regarding the stance to be adopted by India at the WIPO. Pranesh Prakash from the Centre for Internet and Society participated and made a presentation on webcasting, highlighting the differences between webcasting and broadcasting, and arguing that webcasting should not be part of the WIPO Broadcast Treaty.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Letter on South Africa's IPRs from Publicly Financed R&D Regulations
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Jun 02, 2009
—
last modified
Aug 04, 2011 04:42 AM
—
filed under:
Open Standards,
Bayh-Dole,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Open Access,
Open Innovation
Being interested in legislations in developing nations styled after the United States' Bayh-Dole Act, CIS responded to the call issued by the South African Department of Science and Technology for comments to the Intellectual Property Rights from Publicly Financed Research and Development Regulations.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
