-
A Public Discussion on Criminal Defamation in India
-
by
Bhairav Acharya
—
published
Jul 27, 2015
—
filed under:
Defamation,
Internet Governance,
Privacy
The Centre for Internet and Society (CIS); the Network of Women in Media, India; and Media Watch, Bengaluru, are hosting a public discussion on criminal defamation in India. The discussion will start at 5.30 pm on Wednesday, 29 July 2015, at the CIS office in Domlur, Bengaluru.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Events
-
An Analysis of the Cases Filed under Section 46 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 for Adjudication in the State of Maharashtra
-
by
Bhairav Acharya
—
published
Sep 30, 2013
—
last modified
Oct 01, 2013 03:29 PM
—
filed under:
Featured,
Internet Governance,
Privacy
This is a brief review of some of the cases related to privacy filed under section 46 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 ("the Act") seeking adjudication for alleged contraventions of the Act in the State of Maharashtra.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Anvar v. Basheer and the New (Old) Law of Electronic Evidence
-
by
Bhairav Acharya
—
published
Sep 30, 2014
—
last modified
Dec 04, 2014 03:53 PM
—
filed under:
Video,
Internet Governance,
Privacy
The Supreme Court of India revised the law on electronic evidence. The judgment will have an impact on the manner in which wiretap tapes are brought before a court.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Comments on the Information Technology (Electronic Service Delivery) Rules, 2011
-
by
Bhairav Acharya
—
published
Mar 31, 2013
—
last modified
Jul 12, 2013 12:12 PM
—
filed under:
SAFEGUARDS,
Internet Governance,
Privacy
Bhairav Acharya on behalf of the Centre for Internet and Society prepared the following comments on the Information Technology (Electronic Services Delivery) Rules, 2011. These were submitted to the Committee on Subordinate Legislation of the 15th Lok Sabha. These were submitted to the Committee on Subordinate Legislation of the 15th Lok Sabha.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Comments on the Information Technology (Guidelines for Cyber Cafe) Rules, 2011
-
by
Bhairav Acharya
—
published
Mar 31, 2013
—
last modified
Jul 12, 2013 12:15 PM
—
filed under:
Internet Governance,
SAFEGUARDS
Bhairav Acharya on behalf of the Centre for Internet and Society submitted the following comments on the Information Technology (Guidelines for Cyber Cafe Rules), 2011.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Comments on the Information Technology (Reasonable Security Practices and Procedures and Sensitive Personal Data or Information) Rules, 2011
-
by
Bhairav Acharya
—
published
Mar 31, 2013
—
last modified
Jul 12, 2013 12:13 PM
—
filed under:
SAFEGUARDS,
Internet Governance,
Privacy
Bhairav Acharya on behalf of the Centre for Internet and Society prepared the following comments on the Sensitive Personal Data Rules. These were submitted to the Committee on Subordinate Legislation of the 15th Lok Sabha.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Comments on the Proposed Rule 138A of the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 Concerning Radio Frequency Identification Tags
-
by
Bhairav Acharya
—
published
Dec 03, 2012
—
last modified
Dec 04, 2012 03:32 PM
—
filed under:
Internet Governance
The Centre for Internet & Society gave its comments on the proposed Rule 138A of the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989. The comments were made in response to Notification GSR 738(E) published in the Gazette of India on October 3, 2012.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Concerns Regarding DNA Law
-
by
Bhairav Acharya
—
published
Oct 09, 2013
—
last modified
Oct 29, 2013 10:09 AM
—
filed under:
DNA Profiling,
Internet Governance,
Privacy
Recently, a long government process to draft a law to permit the collection, processing, profiling, use and storage of human DNA is nearing conclusion. There are several concerns with this government effort. Below, we present broad-level issues to be kept in mind while dealing with DNA law.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Criminal Defamation and the Supreme Court’s Loss of Reputation
-
by
Bhairav Acharya
—
published
Jun 03, 2016
—
filed under:
Internet Governance,
Privacy
The Supreme Court’s refusal, in Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India, to strike down the anachronistic colonial offence of criminal defamation is wrong. Criminalising defamation serves no legitimate public purpose; the vehicle of criminalisation – sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – is unconstitutional; and the court’s reasoning is woolly at best.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Free Speech Policy in India: Community, Custom, Censorship, and the Future of Internet Regulation
-
by
Bhairav Acharya
—
published
Jul 13, 2015
—
last modified
Aug 23, 2015 10:12 AM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Censorship,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Chilling Effect
This note summarises my panel contribution to the conference on Freedom of Expression in a Digital Age at New Delhi on 21 April 2015, which was organised by the Observer Research Foundation (ORF) and the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS) in collaboration with the Internet Policy Observatory of the Center for Global Communication Studies (CGCS) at the Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog