-
DIDP Request #9 - Exactly how involved is ICANN in the NETmundial Initiative?
-
by
Asvatha Babu
—
published
Jul 27, 2016
—
filed under:
ICANN,
DIDP,
Internet Governance
The importance and relevance of knowing ICANN’s involvement in the NETmundial Initiative cannot be overstated.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
DIDP Request #10 - ICANN does not know how much each RIR contributes to its Budget
-
by
Asvatha Babu
—
published
Jul 27, 2016
—
last modified
Jul 27, 2016 02:57 PM
—
filed under:
ICANN,
DIDP,
Internet Governance
In an effort to understand the relationship between the Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) and ICANN, we requested current and historical information on the contract fees paid by the five RIRs (AfriNIC, ARIN, APNIC, LACNIC and RIPE NCC) to ICANN annually.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
DIDP Request #13: Keeping track of ICANN’s contracted parties: Registries
-
by
Asvatha Babu
—
published
Jul 28, 2016
—
filed under:
ICANN,
DIDP,
Internet Governance
On multiple occasions, Fadi Chehade, then President and CEO of ICANN has emphasized the importance of conducting audits (internal and external) to ensure compliance of ICANN’s contracted parties. At a US congressional hearing, he spoke about the contract monitoring function of ICANN.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
DIDP Request #14: Keeping track of ICANN’s contracted parties: Registrars
-
by
Asvatha Babu
—
published
Jul 28, 2016
—
filed under:
ICANN,
DIDP,
Internet Governance
In September 2016, we filed two separate DIDP requests regarding ICANN’s Contractual Compliance Goals.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
DIDP Request #15: What is going on between Verisign and ICANN?
-
by
Asvatha Babu
—
published
Jul 29, 2016
—
filed under:
ICANN,
DIDP,
Internet Governance
During a hearing of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on “Internet Governance Progress After ICANN 53,” President and CEO of ICANN - Mr Fadi Chehade indicated that ICANN follows up with registries and registrars on receipt of any complaint against them about violations of their contract with ICANN.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
DIDP Request #16 - ICANN has no Documentation on Registrars’ “Abuse Contacts”
-
by
Asvatha Babu
—
published
Jul 29, 2016
—
filed under:
ICANN,
DIDP,
Internet Governance
Registrars on contract with ICANN are required to maintain an “abuse contact” - a 24/7 dedicated phone line and e-mail address to receive reports of abuse regarding the registered names sponsored by the registrar.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
DIDP Request #17 - How ICANN Chooses their Contractual Compliance Auditors
-
by
Asvatha Babu
—
published
Jul 29, 2016
—
filed under:
ICANN,
DIDP,
Internet Governance
At a congressional hearing on internet governance and progress, then President of ICANN Fadi Chehadi indicated that the number of people working on compliance audits grew substantially—from 6 to 24 (we misquoted it as 25)— in the span of a few years.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
DIDP Request #18 - ICANN’s Internal Website will Stay Internal
-
by
Asvatha Babu
—
published
Jul 29, 2016
—
filed under:
ICANN,
DIDP,
Internet Governance
ICANN maintains an internal website accessible to staff and employees. We requested ICANN to provide us with a document with the contents of that website in the interest of transparency and accountability.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
DIDP Request #19 - ICANN’s role in the Postponement of the IANA Transition
-
by
Asvatha Babu
—
published
Jul 29, 2016
—
filed under:
ICANN,
DIDP,
Internet Governance
In March 2014, the National Telecommunications and Information Agency (NTIA) of the United States government announced plans to shift the Internet Assigned Names and Numbers (IANA) functions from ICANN to the global multistakeholder community. The initial deadline set for this was September 2015.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
DIDP Request #20 - Is Presumptive Renewal of Verisign’s Contracts a Good Thing?
-
by
Asvatha Babu
—
published
Jul 30, 2016
—
filed under:
ICANN,
DIDP,
Internet Governance
ICANN’s contract agreements with different registries contain a presumptive renewal clause. Unless they voluntarily give up their rights or there is a material breach by the registry operator, their contract with ICANN will be automatically renewed.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog