-
DIDP #34 On granular detail on ICANN's budget for policy development process
-
by
Akriti Bopanna
—
published
Jul 06, 2019
—
filed under:
ICANN,
DIDP,
Internet Governance
ICANN has Advisory Committees which help guide the policy recommendations that the ICANN community develops while its Supporting Organizations are charged with developing policy recommendations for a particular aspect of ICANN's operations. Supporting Organizations are composed of volunteers from the community. ICANN publishes a combined budget for all these bodies under the head of policy development and CIS inquired about the financial resources allocated to each of them specifically.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
ISOC Report
-
by
Akriti Bopanna
—
published
Jul 03, 2019
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Files
-
CIS Response to ICANN's proposed renewal of .org Registry
-
by
Akriti Bopanna
—
published
Apr 28, 2019
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
ICANN,
IANA,
Internet Governance
We thank ICANN for the opportunity to comment on this issue of its proposed renewal of the .org Registry Agreement with the operator, Public Interest Registry (PIR). Supporting much of the community , we too find severe issues with the proposed agreement. These centre around the removal of price caps and imposing obligations being currently deliberated in an ongoing Policy Development Process (PDP).
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Response to ICANN's proposed renewal of .org Registry
-
by
Akriti Bopanna
—
published
Apr 28, 2019
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Files
-
DIDP #33 On ICANN's 2012 gTLD round auction fund
-
by
Akriti Bopanna
—
published
Apr 04, 2019
—
last modified
Jul 09, 2019 03:51 PM
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
ICANN,
Internet Governance
This DIDP was filed to inquire about the state of the funds ICANN received from the last gTLD auctions.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
CIS Comment on ICANN's Draft FY20 Operating Plan and Budget
-
by
Akriti Bopanna
—
published
Feb 12, 2019
—
filed under:
ICANN,
Internet Governance
At the Centre for Internet and Society, we are grateful for the opportunity to provide our comments on the proposed draft of ICANN’s FY20 Operating Plan and Budget along with their Five-Year Operating Plan Update. As part of the public comment process, ICANN provided a list of documents which can be found here that included their highlights of the budget, the total draft budget for FY20, an operating plan segregated by portfolios, amongst others.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Internet Speech: Perspectives on Regulation and Policy
-
by
Akriti Bopanna
—
published
Feb 07, 2019
—
last modified
Apr 01, 2019 04:38 PM
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Featured,
Internet Freedom,
Event
The Centre for Internet & Society and the University of Munich (LMU), Germany are jointly organizing an international symposium at India Habitat Centre in New Delhi on April 5, 2019
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Events
-
Intermediary Liability and Gender Based Violence Report
-
by
Akriti Bopanna
—
published
Dec 20, 2018
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Files
-
Event Report on Intermediary Liability and Gender Based Violence
-
by
Akriti Bopanna
—
published
Dec 20, 2018
—
last modified
Dec 21, 2018 07:16 AM
—
filed under:
Gender,
Internet Governance
This report is a summary of the proceedings of the Roundtable Conference organized by the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS) at the Digital Citizen Summit, an annual summit organized by the Digital Empowerment Foundation. It was conducted at the India International Centre in New Delhi on November 1, 2018 from 11.30 a.m. to 12.30 p.m.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
ICANN Workstream 2 Recommendations on Accountability
-
by
Akriti Bopanna
—
published
Nov 23, 2018
—
filed under:
ICANN,
Internet Governance,
Accountability
One of the most significant initiatives to improve the accountability of the Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) commenced in 2014, when the Cross Community Working Group on Accountability was created. Its role was to develop a set of proposed enhancements to ICANN’s accountability to the global Internet community. This resulted in the first Work Stream (WS1) recommendations, which were eventually approved and incorporated into the bylaws of ICANN in 2016. These included a provision expressing the need for a second WS since the first one, done on a tight deadline,did not cover all the requisite issues. Instead WS1 only focused on issues that were needed to complete the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority(IANA) transition.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
