-
Privacy, pornography, sexuality (a video)
-
by
Namita A. Malhotra
—
published
Dec 10, 2009
—
last modified
Aug 02, 2011 08:37 AM
—
filed under:
Digital subjectivities,
women and internet,
Censorship,
Obscenity
The video is an attempt to use the material collected for purposes of provoking a discussion around privacy, pornography, sexuality and technology. It focuses largely on an Indian context, which most viewers would be familiar with. The video is pegged around the ban of Savita Bhabhi – a pornographic comic toon – but uses that to open up a discussion on various incidents and concepts in relation to pornography and privacy across Asia.
Located in
RAW
/
…
/
Blogs
/
Porn: Law, Video & Technology
-
Negative of porn
-
by
Namita A. Malhotra
—
published
Sep 12, 2009
—
last modified
Aug 02, 2011 08:35 AM
—
filed under:
Featured,
Art,
Censorship
The post deals with what has been written about Savita Bhabhi in an attempt to make sense of her peccadiloes and with the seeming futility of Porn studies located in America to our different reality. I take the liberty of exploring my own experiential account of pornography since I feel that in that account (mine and others) when done seriously, certain aspects of pornography emerge that address questions that are about cinema, images, sex, philosophy and how desire works. The title is mischeviously inspired from Dr. Pek Van Andel's recent video of MRI images of people having sex.
Located in
RAW
/
…
/
Blogs
/
Porn: Law, Video & Technology
-
Primer on the New IT Act
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Jul 29, 2009
—
last modified
Aug 02, 2011 07:41 AM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Digital Governance,
Public Accountability,
Intermediary Liability,
Censorship
With this draft information bulletin, we briefly discuss some of the problems with the Information Technology Act, and invite your comments.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Comments on the Draft Rules under the Information Technology Act
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Jul 28, 2009
—
last modified
Sep 21, 2011 06:13 AM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Encryption,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Intermediary Liability,
Publications,
Censorship
The Centre for Internet and Society commissioned an advocate, Ananth Padmanabhan, to produce a comment on the Draft Rules that have been published by the government under the Information Technology Act. In his comments, Mr. Padmanabhan highlights the problems with each of the rules and presents specific recommendations on how they can be improved. These comments were sent to the Department of Information and Technology.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
