-
Online Pre-Censorship is Harmful and Impractical
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Dec 07, 2011
—
last modified
Dec 12, 2011 05:00 PM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Obscenity,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Public Accountability,
YouTube,
Social media,
Internet Governance,
Featured,
Intermediary Liability,
Censorship,
Social Networking
The Union Minister for Communications and Information Technology, Mr. Kapil Sibal wants Internet intermediaries to pre-censor content uploaded by their users. Pranesh Prakash takes issue with this and explains why this is a problem, even if the government's heart is in the right place. Further, he points out that now is the time to take action on the draconian IT Rules which are before the Parliament.
Located in
Internet Governance
-
Big Brother is Watching You
-
by
Sunil Abraham
—
published
Jun 01, 2011
—
last modified
Mar 21, 2012 09:32 AM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Internet Governance
The government is massively expanding its surveillance power over law-abiding citizens and businesses, says Sunil Abraham in this article published by the Deccan Herald on June 1, 2011.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Killing the Internet Softly with Its Rules
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
May 25, 2011
—
last modified
Aug 20, 2011 12:51 PM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Internet Governance,
Intermediary Liability
While regulation of the Internet is a necessity, the Department of IT, through recent Rules under the IT Act, is guilty of over-regulation. This over-regulation is not only a bad idea, but is unconstitutional, and gravely endangers freedom of speech and privacy online.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Rebuttal of DIT's Misleading Statements on New Internet Rules
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
May 13, 2011
—
last modified
Jul 11, 2012 01:18 PM
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
IT Act,
Featured,
Intermediary Liability
The press statement issued on May 11 by the Department of Information Technology (DIT) on the furore over the newly-issued rules on 'intermediary due diligence' is misleading and is, in places, plainly false. We are presenting a point-by-point rebuttal of the DIT's claims.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
DIT's Response to RTI on Website Blocking
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Apr 07, 2011
—
last modified
Aug 02, 2011 07:13 AM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Featured,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
For the first time in India, we have a list of websites that are blocked by order of the Indian government. This data was received from the Department of Information Technology in response to an RTI that CIS filed. Pranesh Prakash of CIS analyzes the implications of these blocks, as well as the shortcomings of the DIT's response.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
RTI Applications on Blocking of Websites
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Mar 08, 2011
—
last modified
Dec 21, 2012 06:34 AM
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
IT Act,
RTI,
Public Accountability
In recent weeks, an increasing number of incidents have come to light on government-ordered blocking of websites. In one case involving Zone-H.org, it is clear who has ordered the block (a Delhi district court judge, as an interim order), even though the block itself is open to constitutional challenge. In all others cases, including the TypePad case, it is unclear who has ordered the block and why. We at CIS have sent in two right to information requests to find out.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
CIS Para-wise Comments on Intermediary Due Diligence Rules, 2011
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Feb 25, 2011
—
last modified
Jul 11, 2012 10:27 AM
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
IT Act,
Intermediary Liability
On February 7th 2011, the Department of Information Technology, MCIT published draft rules on its website (The Information Technology (Due diligence observed by intermediaries guidelines) Rules, 2011) in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 87(2)(zg), read with Section 79(2) of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Comments were invited from the public before February 25th 2011. Accordingly, Privacy India and Centre for Internet and Society, Bangalore have prepared the following para-wise comments for the Ministry’s consideration.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
CIS Para-wise Comments on Cyber Café Rules, 2011
-
by
Prashant Iyengar
—
published
Feb 25, 2011
—
last modified
Dec 14, 2012 10:32 AM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Internet Governance
On February 7th 2011, the Department of Information Technology, MCIT published draft rules on its website (The Information Technology (Guidelines for Cyber Cafe) Rules, 2011) in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 87(2) (zg), read with Section 79(2) of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Comments were invited from the public before February 25th 2011. Accordingly, Privacy India and Centre for Internet and Society, Bangalore have prepared the following para wise comments for the Ministry’s consideration.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
CIS Para-wise Comments on Draft Reasonable Security Practices Rules, 2011
-
by
Prashant Iyengar
—
published
Feb 24, 2011
—
last modified
Dec 14, 2012 10:32 AM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Internet Governance
On February 7th 2011, the Department of Information Technology, MCIT published draft rules on its website (The Information Technology (Reasonable security practices and procedures and sensitive personal information) Rules, 2011) in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 87(2)(ob), read with Section 43A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Comments were invited from the public before February 25th 2011. Accordingly, Privacy India and Centre for Internet and Society, Bangalore have prepared the following para-wise comments for the Ministry’s consideration.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Cybercrime and Privacy
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Aug 31, 2010
—
last modified
Sep 14, 2010 01:21 PM
—
filed under:
IT Act,
Internet Governance
Elonnai Hickok examines privacy in the context of India’s legal provisions on cybercrime. She picks up the relevant provisions of the Information Technology Act as amended in 2008 dealing with cyber crimes and provides a fair analysis of the pros and cons of the amended Act.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
/
Privacy