One reason startups are moving out of India
Prime Minister Narendra Modi says Make in India. But anyone who wants to, finds that their intellectual property is valued much more if the patent is filed in the US, or anywhere else, but India.
The article by Evelyn Fok and Varun Aggarwal was published in the Times of India on April 10, 2015. Sunil Abraham gave his inputs.
Take the case of BITS Pilani graduate Sriram Kanuni, for instance, who decided to come back to India after spending 12 years with SAP in Germany. His family thought he was out of his mind, but he wanted to work for India and primarily serve Indian clients.
His core vision hasn't wavered five years down the line, but he has been forced to move a large part of his company's intellectual property (IP) to the US, just to get a better valuation for his next round of funding. And his is not an isolated case.
"Global investors seem to value companies with patents in the US much  higher. Therefore, it makes more sense to shift patents out of India, in  case you're looking to raise money or exit the company," Kanuni, who is  the CEO and co-founder of Arteria Technologies, said.
 
 Major  Indian startups such as Flipkart, Myntra and ZipDial, which have either  raised over a billion dollars or exited, already have their IPs outside  the country. Experts say that is one of the reasons that attracted  investors.
 
 "If a company with its IP in India is acquired by an  international firm, and post acquisition the buyer wishes to transfer  the IP to a different jurisdiction, such transfer would need to be at a  fair value decided by the government and the company is taxed at the  rate of 34% on that," one of the bankers who was part of a large exit  told ET.
 
 "For tech-centric companies where the value of IP  would comprise over 70-80% of their value, such high taxes can possibly  make them unattractive for potential investors," they added.
 
 With better valuation and exits in mind, startups are moving out their  innovation to countries such as Singapore and the US, leaving behind  very little intellectual property that the country can proudly call its  own.
"You would want to incorporate somewhere with a respected reputation for  maintaining legal protection when it comes to copyright and trademarks,  especially with global licensees or partners," said Sharad Devarajan,  co-founder and CEO of character entertainment company Graphic India,  which is incorporated in Singapore.
 
 "Incorporation in a country  like the US where potential for M&A is higher, especially for core  technology startups, will generally make it more attractive to potential  buyers as it avoids a lot of legal and financial paperwork," said Brij  Bhasin, India investment lead of Japanese venture capital firm Rebright  Partners.
 
 Investor concerns over IP are well founded. "Indian  courts aren't uniform when it comes to developing jurisprudence around  copyright and patent infringement," explained Sunil Abraham, executive  director of Bengaluru-based research organization Centre for Internet  and Society.
 
 "There is a high chance that a judge who doesn't  understand the details would give an injunction. Then the loss of six  months, etc, can be quite expensive, because in six months' time your  competitor might eat into all of your market," he said.

