-
Taking Stock: Emerging Issues - Internet Surveillance
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Oct 25, 2013
—
last modified
Nov 09, 2013 06:31 AM
—
filed under:
Internet Governance
This session was held at the IGF in Bali on October 25. Pranesh Prakash made intervention in this session.
Located in
News & Media
-
Talk by Anubha Sinha on Open Access in JNU
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Mar 29, 2017
Located in
Openness
/
Files
-
Targeting surveillance
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Dec 30, 2014
—
filed under:
Surveillance,
Internet Governance,
Privacy
In the fall of 2005, Scotland Yard raided a flat in west London and arrested a suspected al-Qaeda militant known by a teasing Arabic nickname, Irhabi (“Terrorist”) 007.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
News & Media
-
Tata Photon unblocks Wordpress.com
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Sep 03, 2012
—
filed under:
Social media,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Public Accountability,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
As of yesterday, the Tata Photon service of the Internet service provider (ISP) Tata Teleservices seems to have lifted the block it had put on the Wordpress.com domain for over a week.
Located in
News & Media
-
Tech companies like Gmail, WhatsApp may be asked to store user information
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Oct 14, 2016
—
filed under:
Social Media,
WhatsApp,
Internet Governance
The government is moving to formulate rules that will require technology ‘intermediaries’— including email services like Gmail, chat apps such as WhatsApp and Snapchat or even ecommerce firms like Amazon — to retain user information, a development that is expected to be met with determined opposition.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
News & Media
-
Technological Protection Measures in the Copyright (Amendment) Bill, 2010
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Apr 28, 2010
—
last modified
May 17, 2012 04:51 PM
—
filed under:
Access to Knowledge,
Copyright,
Intellectual Property Rights,
FLOSS,
Technological Protection Measures,
Publications
In this post Pranesh Prakash conducts a legal exegesis of section 65A of the Copyright (Amendment) Bill, 2010, which deals with the stuff that enables 'Digital Rights/Restrictions Management', i.e., Technological Protection Measures. He notes that while the provision avoids some mistakes of the American law, it still poses grave problems to consumers, and that there are many uncertainties in it still.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Technology in Government and Topics in Privacy
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Dec 09, 2013
—
last modified
Dec 27, 2013 10:20 AM
—
filed under:
Internet Governance,
Privacy
Malavika Jayaram is a speaker at an event organized by Data Privacy Lab at CGIS Cafe, Cambridge Street, Harvard University Campus. She will speak on Biometrics in Beta – India's Identity Experiment on December 9, 2013.
Located in
News & Media
-
Ten Indian government agencies can now snoop on people’s internet data
-
by
Admin
—
published
Dec 25, 2018
—
filed under:
Internet Governance
In a significant attack on online privacy, India’s Home Affair’s Ministry has authorised no fewer than ten different central government agencies to intercept, monitor, and decrypt “any information generated, transmitted, received or stored in any computer”.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
News & Media
-
That’s the unkindest cut, Mr Sibal
-
by
Sunil Abraham
—
published
Dec 12, 2011
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance
There’s Kolaveri-di on the Internet over Kapil Sibal’s diktat to social media sites to prescreen users’ posts. That diktat goes far beyond the restrictions placed on our freedom of expression by the IT Act. But, says Sunil Abraham of the Centre for Internet and Society, India is not going to be silenced online.
Located in
Internet Governance
-
The (in)Visible Subject: Power, Privacy and Social Networking
-
by
Rebecca Schild
—
published
Feb 26, 2010
—
last modified
Aug 18, 2011 05:06 AM
—
filed under:
Social Networking,
Attention Economy,
Facebook,
Privacy
In this entry, I will argue that the interplay between privacy and power on social network sites works ultimately to subject individuals to the gaze of others, or to alternatively render them invisible. Individual choices concerning privacy preferences must, therefore, be informed by the intrinsic relationship which exists between publicness/privateness and subjectivity/obscurity.
Located in
Openness
/
Blog