-
Unpacking Openness: From Seemingly Transparent to Definitely Opaque
-
by
Maarten Zeinstra and Marlieke Kieboom
—
published
Aug 01, 2012
—
last modified
Aug 01, 2012 09:16 AM
—
filed under:
Openness
Nishant Shah was in Netherlands recently and as part of his trip had given a public lecture to an audience at Kennisland. One of the respondents wrote a small write-up of the talk.
Located in
Openness
-
Updated Aadhaar Report
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
May 16, 2017
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Files
-
US Copyright law faces constitutional challenge
-
by
Anubha Sinha
—
published
Aug 11, 2016
—
filed under:
Copyright,
Access to Knowledge
In a major international development, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has filed a lawsuit to strike down the provisions on Digital Rights Management(DRM) in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. In this post, I discuss DRMs, the EFF lawsuit, and then draw upon the differences between the US and Indian copyright regime on DRM protection.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
US pressure threatens to weaken data - localisation mandate in India's landmark data-protection bill
-
by
Sandhya Sharma
—
published
Aug 22, 2019
—
filed under:
Internet Governance
Sources say the bill may have to concede vital ground to technology companies.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
News & Media
-
Use made of Open Access Journals by Indian Researchers to Publish their Findings
-
by
Madhan Muthu and Subbiah Arunachalam
—
published
May 28, 2013
—
last modified
Jul 04, 2013 04:45 AM
—
filed under:
Openness,
Open Content,
Open Access
Most of the papers published in the more than 360 Indian open access journals are by Indian researchers. But how many papers do they publish in high impact international open access journals? We have looked at India’s contribution to all seven Public Library of Science (PLoS) journals, 10 BioMed Central (BMC) ournals and Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports. Indian crystallographers have published more than 2,000 structure reports in Acta Crystallographica, second only to China in number of papers, but have a much better citations per paper average than USA, Britain, Germany and France, China and South Korea. India’s contribution to BMC and PLoS journals, on the other hand, is modest at best. We suggest that the better option for India is institutional self-archiving.
Located in
Openness
/
Blog
-
Use of Open Access Journals by Indian Researchers
-
by
Subbiah Gunasekaran and Subbiah Arunachalam
—
published
May 27, 2013
—
last modified
Jul 04, 2013 04:50 AM
—
filed under:
Openness
Indian researchers have published more than 43,400 papers in over 4,600 journals in 2009 as seen from Science Citation Index (SCI) – Expanded. Of these, over 6,900 (or one in six) papers are published in 445 open access (OA) journals. The proportion of papers published by Indian researchers in OA journals is considerably higher than the world average, which is estimated to be 8.5–10.0%. Although India publishes well over a thousand journals, including about 360 OA journals, SCI Expanded indexed in 2009 only 101 Indian S&T journals including 46 OA journals. It is likely that the percentage of Indian papers in OA journals as seen from SCI will be higher if more Indian journals are indexed in SCI Expanded.
Located in
Openness
/
Blog
-
Use of Open Access Journals by Indian Researchers
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Jun 04, 2013
Located in
Openness
/
Blog
-
Use of Open Access Journals for Publishing Findings
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Jun 04, 2013
Located in
Openness
/
Blog
-
Using technology to address issues
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Aug 15, 2016
—
filed under:
Accessibility
Can technology help the visually-disabled, who have no access to books and reading resources in their schools?
Located in
Accessibility
/
News & Media
-
Using the Wikimedia sphere for the revitalization of small and underrepresented languages in India
-
by
Subodh Kulkarni
—
published
Feb 10, 2024
—
filed under:
CIS-A2K,
Access to Knowledge,
Wikimedia,
Wikipedia,
A2K Research
This report explores opportunities within the Wikimedia movement and projects to help revitalise small and underrepresented languages in India and provide recommendations to CIS’s Access to Knowledge team in furthering this effort. The report is mainly based on a roundtable conversation on Digital Access in Bhubaneswar with a diverse range of backgrounds and professions, including independent researchers, representatives from non-profit organizations, retired government officials, Wikimedia contributors (both Odia and Santali), ecological activists, directors of research institutes, consultants, and journalists. This was organized by the Access to Knowledge team of CIS in collaboration with Vasundhara, Bhubaneswar.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs