The Centre for Internet and Society
https://cis-india.org
These are the search results for the query, showing results 361 to 375.
Data Infrastructures and Inequities: Why Does Reproductive Health Surveillance in India Need Our Urgent Attention?
https://cis-india.org/internet-governance/blog/data-infrastructures-inequities-reproductive-health-surveillance-india
<b>In order to bring out certain conceptual and procedural problems with health monitoring in the Indian context, this article by Aayush Rathi and Ambika Tandon posits health monitoring as surveillance and not merely as a “data problem.” Casting a critical feminist lens, the historicity of surveillance practices unveils the gendered power differentials wedded into taken-for-granted “benign” monitoring processes. The unpacking of the Mother and Child Tracking System and the National Health Stack reveals the neo-liberal aspirations of the Indian state. </b>
<p> </p>
<p><em>The article was first published by <a href="https://www.epw.in/engage/article/data-infrastructures-inequities-why-does-reproductive-health-surveillance-india-need-urgent-attention" target="_blank">EPW Engage, Vol. 54, Issue No. 6</a>, on 9 February 2019.</em></p>
<hr />
<h3><strong>Framing Reproductive Health as a Surveillance Question</strong></h3>
<p>The approach of the postcolonial Indian state to healthcare has been Malthusian, with the prioritisation of family planning and birth control (Hodges 2004). Supported by the notion of socio-economic development arising out of a “modernisation” paradigm, the target-based approach to achieving reduced fertility rates has shaped India’s reproductive and child health (RCH) programme (Simon-Kumar 2006).</p>
<p>This is also the context in which India’s abortion law, the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, was framed in 1971, placing the decisional privacy of women seeking abortions in the hands of registered medical practitioners. The framing of the MTP act invisibilises females seeking abortions for non-medical reasons within the legal framework. The exclusionary provisions only exacerbated existing gaps in health provisioning, as access to safe and legal abortions had already been curtailed by severe geographic inequalities in funding, infrastructure, and human resources. The state has concomitantly been unable to meet contraceptive needs of married couples or reduce maternal and infant mortality rates in large parts of the country, mediating access along the lines of class, social status, education, and age (Sanneving et al 2013).</p>
<p>While the official narrative around the RCH programme transitioned to focus on universal access to healthcare in the 1990s, the target-based approach continues to shape the reality on the ground. The provision of reproductive healthcare has been deeply unequal and, in some cases, in hospitals. These targets have been known to be met through the practice of forced, and often unsafe, sterilisation, in conditions of absence of adequate provisions or trained professionals, pre-sterilisation counselling, or alternative forms of contraception (Sama and PLD 2018). Further, patients have regularly been provided cash incentives, foreclosing the notion of free consent, especially given that the target population of these camps has been women from marginalised economic classes in rural India.</p>
<p>Placing surveillance studies within a feminist praxis allows us to frame the reproductive health landscape as more than just an ill-conceived, benign monitoring structure. The critical lens becomes useful for highlighting that taken-for-granted structures of monitoring are wedded with power differentials: genetic screening in fertility clinics, identification documents such as birth certificates, and full-body screeners are just some of the manifestations of this (Adrejevic 2015). Emerging conversations around feminist surveillance studies highlight that these data systems are neither benign nor free of gendered implications (Andrejevic 2015). In continual remaking of the social, corporeal body as a data actor in society, such practices render some bodies normative and obfuscate others, based on categorisations put in place by the surveiller.</p>
<p>In fact, the history of surveillance can be traced back to the colonial state where it took the form of systematic sexual and gendered violence enacted upon indigenous populations in order to render them compliant (Rifkin 2011; Morgensen 2011). Surveillance, then, manifests as a “scientific” rationalisation of complex social hieroglyphs (such as reproductive health) into formats enabling administrative interventions by the modern state. Lyon (2001) has also emphasised how the body emerged as the site of surveillance in order for the disciplining of the “irrational, sensual body”—essential to the functioning of the modern nation-state—to effectively happen.</p>
<h3><strong>Questioning the Information and Communications Technology for Development (ICT4D) and Big Data for Development (BD4D) Rhetoric</strong></h3>
<p>Information and Communications Technology (ICT) and data-driven approaches to the development of a robust health information system, and by extension, welfare, have been offered as solutions to these inequities and exclusions in access to maternal and reproductive healthcare in the country.</p>
<p>The move towards data-driven development in the country commenced with the introduction of the Health Management Information System in Andhra Pradesh in 2008, and the Mother and Child Tracking System (MCTS) nationally in 2011. These are reproductive health information systems (HIS) that collect granular data about each pregnancy from the antenatal to the post-natal period, at the level of each sub-centre as well as primary and community health centre. The introduction of HIS comprised cross-sectoral digitisation measures that were a part of the larger national push towards e-governance; along with health, thirty other distinct areas of governance, from land records to banking to employment, were identified for this move towards the digitalised provisioning of services (MeitY 2015).</p>
<p>The HIS have been seen as playing a critical role in the ecosystem of health service provision globally. HIS-based interventions in reproductive health programming have been envisioned as a means of: (i) improving access to services in the context of a healthcare system ridden with inequalities; (ii) improving the quality of services provided, and (iii) producing better quality data to facilitate the objectives of India’s RCH programme, including family planning and population control. Accordingly, starting 2018, the MCTS is being replaced by the RCH portal in a phased manner. The RCH portal, in areas where the ANMOL (ANM Online) application has been introduced, captures data real-time through tablets provided to health workers (MoHFW 2015).</p>
<p>A proposal to mandatorily link the Aadhaar with data on pregnancies and abortions through the MCTS/RCH has been made by the union minister for Women and Child Development as a deterrent to gender-biased sex selection (Tembhekar 2016). The proposal stems from the prohibition of gender-biased sex selection provided under the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostics Techniques (PCPNDT) Act, 1994. The approach taken so far under the PCPNDT Act, 2014 has been to regulate the use of technologies involved in sex determination. However, the steady decline in the national sex ratio since the passage of the PCPNDT Act provides a clear indication that the regulation of such technology has been largely ineffective. A national policy linking Aadhaar with abortions would be aimed at discouraging gender-biased sex selection through state surveillance, in direct violation of a female’s right to decisional privacy with regards to their own body.</p>
<p>Linking Aadhaar would also be used as a mechanism to enable direct benefit transfer (DBT) to the beneficiaries of the national maternal benefits scheme. Linking reproductive health services to the Aadhaar ecosystem has been critiqued because it is exclusionary towards women with legitimate claims towards abortions and other reproductive services and benefits, and it heightens the risk of data breaches in a cultural fabric that already stigmatises abortions. The bodies on which this stigma is disproportionately placed, unmarried or disabled females, for instance, experience the harms of visibility through centralised surveillance mechanisms more acutely than others by being penalised for their deviance from cultural expectations. This is in accordance with the theory of "data extremes,” wherein marginalised communities are seen as living on the extremes of data capture, leading to a data regime that either refuses to recognise them as legitimate entities or subjects them to overpolicing in order to discipline deviance (Arora 2016). In both developed and developing contexts, the broader purpose of identity management has largely been to demarcate legitimate and illegitimate actors within a population, either within the framework of security or welfare.</p>
<h3><strong>Potential Harms of the Data Model of Reproductive Health Provisioning</strong></h3>
<p>Informational privacy and decisional privacy are critically shaped by data flows and security within the MCTS/RCH. No standards for data sharing and storage, or anonymisation and encryption of data have been implemented despite role-based authentication (NHSRC and Taurus Glocal 2011). The risks of this architectural design are further amplified in the context of the RCH/ANMOL where data is captured real-time. In the absence of adequate safeguards against data leaks, real-time data capture risks the publicising of reproductive health choices in an already stigmatised environment. This opens up avenues for further dilution of autonomy in making future reproductive health choices.</p>
<p>Several core principles of informational privacy, such as limitations regarding data collection and usage, or informed consent, also need to be reworked within this context.<sup>[1]</sup> For instance, the centrality of the requirement of “free, informed consent” by an individual would need to be replaced by other models, especially in the context of reproductive health of rape survivors who are vulnerable and therefore unable to exercise full agency. The ability to make a free and informed choice, already dismantled in the context of contemporary data regimes, gets further precluded in such contexts. The constraints on privacy in decisions regarding the body are then replicated in the domain of reproductive data collection.</p>
<p>What is uniform across these digitisation initiatives is their treatment of maternal and reproductive health as solely a medical event, framed as a data scarcity problem. In doing so, they tend to amplify the understanding of reproductive health through measurable indicators that ignore social determinants of health. For instance, several studies conducted in the rural Indian context have shown that the degree of women’s autonomy influences the degree of usage of pregnancy care, and that the uptake of pregnancy care was associated with village-level indicators such as economic development, provisioning of basic infrastructure and social cohesion. These contextual factors get overridden in pervasive surveillance systems that treat reproductive healthcare as comprising only of measurable indicators and behaviours, that are dependent on individual behaviour of practitioners and women themselves, rather than structural gaps within the system.</p>
<p>While traditionally associated with state governance, the contemporary surveillance regime is experienced as distinct from its earlier forms due to its reliance on a nexus between surveillance by the state and private institutions and actors, with both legal frameworks and material apparatuses for data collection and sharing (Shepherd 2017). As with historical forms of surveillance, the harms of contemporary data regimes accrue disproportionately among already marginalised and dissenting communities and individuals. Data-driven surveillance has been critiqued for its excesses in multiple contexts globally, including in the domains of predictive policing, health management, and targeted advertising (Mason 2015). In the attempts to achieve these objectives, surveillance systems have been criticised for their reliance on replicating past patterns, reifying proximity to a hetero-patriarchal norm (Haggerty and Ericson 2000). Under data-driven surveillance systems, this proximity informs the preexisting boxes of identity for which algorithmic representations of the individual are formed. The boxes are defined contingent on the distinct objectives of the particular surveillance project, collating disparate pieces of data flows and resulting in the recasting of the singular offline self into various 'data doubles' (Haggerty and Ericson 2000). Refractive, rather than reflective, the data doubles have implications for the physical, embodied life of individual with an increasing number of service provisioning relying on the data doubles (Lyon 2001). Consider, for instance, apps on menstruation, fertility, and health, and wearables such as fitness trackers and pacers, that support corporate agendas around what a woman’s healthy body should look, be or behave like (Lupton 2014). Once viewed through the lens of power relations, the fetishised, apolitical notion of the data “revolution” gives way to what we may better understand as “dataveillance.”</p>
<h3><strong>Towards a Networked State and a Neo-liberal Citizen</strong></h3>
<p>Following in this tradition of ICT being treated as the solution to problems plaguing India’s public health information system, a larger, all-pervasive healthcare ecosystem is now being proposed by the Indian state (NITI Aayog 2018). Termed the National Health Stack, it seeks to create a centralised electronic repository of health records of Indian citizens with the aim of capturing every instance of healthcare service usage. Among other functions, it also envisions a platform for the provisioning of health and wellness-based services that may be dispensed by public or private actors in an attempt to achieve universal health coverage. By allowing private parties to utilise the data collected through pullable open application program interfaces (APIs), it also fits within the larger framework of the National Health Policy 2017 that envisions the private sector playing a significant role in the provision of healthcare in India. It also then fits within the state–private sector nexus that characterises dataveillance. This, in turn, follows broader trends towards market-driven solutions and private financing of health sector reform measures that have already had profound consequences on the political economy of healthcare worldwide (Joe et al 2018).</p>
<p>These initiatives are, in many ways, emblematic of the growing adoption of network governance reform by the Indian state (Newman 2001). This is a stark shift from its traditional posturing as the hegemonic sovereign nation state. This shift entails the delayering from large, hierarchical and unitary government systems to horizontally arranged, more flexible, relatively dispersed systems.<sup>[2]</sup> The former govern through the power of rules and law, while the latter take the shape of self-regulating networks such as public–private contractual arrangements (Snellen 2005). ICTs have been posited as an effective tool in enabling the transition to network governance by enhancing local governance and interactive policymaking enabling the co-production of knowledge (Ferlie et al 2011). The development of these capabilities is also critical to addressing “wicked problems” such as healthcare (Rittel and Webber 1973).<sup>[3]</sup> The application of the techno-deterministic, data-driven model to reproductive healthcare provision, then, resembles a fetishised approach to technological change. The NHSRC describes this as the collection of data without an objective, leading to a disproportional burden on data collection over use (NHSRC and Taurus Glocal 2011).</p>
<p>The blurring of the functions of state and private actors is reflective of the neo-liberal ethic, which produces new practices of governmentality. Within the neo-liberal framework of reproductive healthcare, the citizen is constructed as an individual actor, with agency over and responsibility for their own health and well-being (Maturo et al 2016).</p>
<h3><strong>“Quantified Self” of the Neo-liberal Citizen</strong></h3>
<p>Nowhere can the manifestation of this neo-liberal citizen can be seen as clearly as in the “quantified self” movement. The quantified self movement refers to the emergence of a whole range of apps that enable the user to track bodily functions and record data to achieve wellness and health goals, including menstruation, fertility, pregnancies, and health indicators in the mother and baby. Lupton (2015) labels this as the emergence of the “digitised reproductive citizen,” who is expected to be attentive to her fertility and sexual behaviour to achieve better reproductive health goals. The practice of collecting data around reproductive health is not new to the individual or the state, as has been demonstrated by the discussion above. What is new in this regime of datafication under the self-tracking movement is the monetisation of reproductive health data by private actors, the labour for which is performed by the user. Focusing on embodiment draws attention to different kinds of exploitation engendered by reproductive health apps. Not only is data about the body collected and sold, the unpaid labour for collection is extracted from the user. The reproductive body can then be understood as a cyborg, or a woman-machine hybrid, systematically digitising its bodily functions for profit-making within the capitalist (re)production machine (Fotoloulou 2016). Accordingly, all major reproductive health tracking apps have a business model that relies on selling information about users for direct marketing of products around reproductive health and well-being (Felizi and Varon nd).</p>
<p>As has been pointed out in the case of big data more broadly, reproductive health applications (apps) facilitate the visibility of the female reproductive body in the public domain. Supplying anonymised data sets to medical researchers and universities fills some of the historical gaps in research around the female body and reproductive health. Reproductive and sexual health tracking apps globally provide their users a platform to engage with biomedical information around sexual and reproductive health. Through group chats on the platform, they are also able to engage with experiential knowledge of sexual and reproductive health. This could also help form transnational networks of solidarity around the body and health (Fotopoulou 2016).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This radical potential of network-building around reproductive and sexual health is, however, tempered to a large extent by the reconfiguration of gendered stereotypes through these apps. In a study on reproductive health apps on Google Play Store, Lupton (2014) finds that products targeted towards female users are marketed through the discourse of risk and vulnerability, while those targeted towards male users are framed within that of virility. Apart from reiterating gendered stereotypes around the male and female body, such a discourse assumes that the entire labour of family planning is performed by females. This same is the case with the MCTS/RCH.</p>
<p>Technological interventions such as reproductive health apps as well as HIS are based on the assumption that females have perfect control over decisions regarding their own bodies and reproductive health, despite this being disproved in India. The Guttmacher Institute (2014) has found that 60% of women in India report not having control over decisions regarding their own healthcare. The failure to account for the husband or the family as stakeholder in decision-making around reproductive health has been a historical failure of the family planning programme in India, and is now being replicated in other modalities. This notion of an autonomous citizen who is able to take responsibility of their own reproductive health and well-being does not hold true in the Indian context. It can even be seen as marginalising females who have already been excluded from the reproductive health system, as they are held responsible for their own inability to access healthcare.</p>
<h3><strong>Concluding Remarks</strong></h3>
<p>The interplay that emerges between reproductive health surveillance and data infrastructures is a complex one. It requires the careful positioning of the political nature of data collection and processing as well as its hetero-patriarchal and colonial legacies, within the need for effective utilisation of data for achieving developmental goals. Assessing this discourse through a feminist lens identifies the web of power relations in data regimes. This problematises narratives of technological solutions for welfare provision.</p>
<p>The reproductive healthcare framework in India then offers up a useful case study to assess these concerns. The growing adoption of ICT-based surveillance tools to equalise access to healthcare needs to be understood in the socio-economic, legal, and cultural context where these tools are being implemented. Increased surveillance has historically been associated with causing the structural gendered violence that it is now being offered as a solution to. This is a function of normative standards being constructed for reproductive behaviour that necessarily leave out broader definitions of reproductive health and welfare when viewed through a feminist lens. Within the larger context of health policymaking in India, moves towards privatisation then demonstrate the peculiarity of dataveillance as it functions through an unaccountable and pervasive overlapping of state and private surveillance practises. It remains to be seen how these trends in ICT-driven health policies affect access to reproductive rights and decisional privacy for millions of females in India and other parts of the global South.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>
For more details visit <a href='https://cis-india.org/internet-governance/blog/data-infrastructures-inequities-reproductive-health-surveillance-india'>https://cis-india.org/internet-governance/blog/data-infrastructures-inequities-reproductive-health-surveillance-india</a>
</p>
No publisherAayush Rathi and Ambika TandonBig DataData SystemsPrivacyResearchers at WorkInternet GovernanceResearchBD4DHealthcareSurveillanceBig Data for Development2019-12-30T16:44:32ZBlog EntryData for Governance, Governance of Data, and Data Anxieties
https://cis-india.org/raw/data-for-governance-governance-of-data-and-data-anxieties
<b>The Center for International Media Assistance (CIMA) organised a panel discussion on 'The Data Explosion – How the Internet of Things will Affect Media Freedom and Communication Systems?' at Deutsche Welle's Global Media Forum 2016, held in Bonn, Germany during June 13-15, 2016. Sumandro Chattapadhyay was invited as one of the panelists.</b>
<p> </p>
<h2>Introduction to the Panel</h2>
<p>The emerging Internet of Things (IoT) will result in a vast network of Internet-connected devices that generate enormous volumes of data about human behavior and interactions. This data explosion will potentially reshape how media organizations both collect and report news, while at the same time fundamentally shifting how communications networks are organized worldwide. Yet currently most of the discussion about the IoT has focused on its spread in developed countries via the popularization of Internet-connected consumer devices.</p>
<p>In this panel we will discuss how the IoT may develop differently in the Global South and how it could present either a threat to open access to data and information, or an opportunity to improve media systems worldwide. We will also examine the impact of the data explosion in developing countries and what mechanisms need to be created in order to ensure the huge new mountain of data is used and governed responsibly.</p>
<p>The discussants were Carlos Affonso Souza (Director, <a href="http://itsrio.org/en/">Institute for Technology and Society</a> of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), Lorena Jaume-Palasi (Director for Communications, <a href="http://www.eurodig.org/">European Dialogue on Internet Governance, or EuroDIG</a>, Switzerland), and Sumandro Chattapadhyay (Research Director, the Centre for Internet and Society, India); and the conversation was led by Mark Nelson (Senior Director, <a href="http://www.cima.ned.org/">Center for International Media Assistance, or CIMA</a>, USA).</p>
<p><em>Source: <a href="http://www.dw.com/en/the-data-explosion-how-the-internet-of-things-will-affect-media-freedom-and-communication-systems/a-19116102">Deutsche Welle</a></em>.</p>
<p> </p>
<h2>Audio Recording</h2>
<iframe src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/269045180&color=ff5500&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false" frameborder="no" scrolling="no" height="166" width="100%"></iframe>
<p> </p>
<h2>Things/Writings I have Mentioned</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://aqicn.org/map/world/">Air Pollution in World: Real-time Air Quality Index Visual Map</a>.</li>
<li><a href="http://openenvironment.indiaopendata.com/#/airowl/">India Open Data Association - AirOwl</a>.</li>
<li><a href="http://openenvironment.indiaopendata.com/#/dashboard/">India Open Data Association - Open Environment Data Project</a>.</li>
<li><a href="http://scroll.in/article/805909/in-rajasthan-there-is-unrest-at-the-ration-shop-because-of-error-ridden-aadhaar">Anumeha Yadav - 'In Rajasthan, there is ‘unrest at the ration shop’ because of error-ridden Aadhaar'</a>.</li>
<li><a href="http://thewire.in/2016/05/16/before-geospatial-bill-a-long-history-of-killing-the-map-in-order-to-protect-the-territory-36453/">Sumandro Chattapadhyay and Adya Garg - 'Before Geospatial Bill: A Long History of Killing the Map in Order to Protect the Territory'</a>.</li>
<li><a href="http://savethemap.in/">Save the Map</a>.</li></ul>
<p> </p>
<p>
For more details visit <a href='https://cis-india.org/raw/data-for-governance-governance-of-data-and-data-anxieties'>https://cis-india.org/raw/data-for-governance-governance-of-data-and-data-anxieties</a>
</p>
No publishersumandroDigital NewsGeospatial Information Regulation BillUIDData SystemsDigital KnowledgeResearchAadhaarResearchers at Work2016-07-03T05:59:48ZBlog EntryData bleeding everywhere: a story of period trackers
https://cis-india.org/raw/sadaf-khan-data-bleeding-everywhere-a-story-of-period-trackers
<b>This is an excerpt from an essay by Sadaf Khan, written for and published as part of the Bodies of Evidence collection of Deep Dives. The Bodies of Evidence collection, edited by Bishakha Datta and Richa Kaul Padte, is a collaboration between Point of View and the Centre for Internet and Society, undertaken as part of the Big Data for Development Network supported by International Development Research Centre, Canada.</b>
<p> </p>
<h4>Please read the full essay on Deep Dives: <a href="https://deepdives.in/data-bleeding-everywhere-a-story-of-period-trackers-8766dc6a1e00" target="_blank">Data bleeding everywhere: a story of period trackers</a></h4>
<h4>Sadaf Khan: <a href="http://mediamatters.pk/the-team/" target="_blank">Media Matters for Democracy</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/nuqsh" target="_blank">Twitter</a></h4>
<hr />
<p>...By now there are a number of questions buzzing around my head, most of them unasked. Are users comfortable with so much of their data being collected? Are there really algorithms that string together all this data into medically-relevant trends? How reliable can these trends be when usage is erratic? Are period tracking apps pioneering, fundamental elements of a future where medical aid is digital and reliable data is inevitably linked to the provision of medical services? And if so, are privacy and health soon to become conflicting rights?</p>
<p>I also want to find out how users understand data collection and privacy before giving apps consent to utilize their data and information as they will. Hareem says she gives apps informed consent. ‘If my data becomes a part of the statistics aiding medical research, why not? There is no harm in it. I am getting a good service, and if my data helps create a better understanding as a part of a larger statistical pool, they are welcome to use it.’</p>
<p>But is she really sure that this information will be used only as anonymised data for medical research? ‘Look at the kind of information that is being collected,’ she answers. ‘Dates, mood, consistency of mucus, basal temperature. What kind of use does one have for this data?’</p>
<p>Naila, in turn, says: ‘Honestly, I have never really thought about what happens to the data the application collects. Obviously I enter detailed information about my cycle and my moods and my sex life. But a), my account is under a fake name and b), even if it wasn’t, who would have any use for stuff like when my period starts and ends and what my mood or digestive system is like at any given moment?’</p>
<p>In fact, this sentiment is shared among all the women interviewed for this piece — what use would anyone have for this data?</p>
<p>As users, we often imagine our own data as anonymised within a huge dataset. But as users, we don’t have enough information about how our data is being used — or will be used in future. The open and at times vague language of a platform’s terms and conditions allows menstrual apps to use data in ways that I may not know of. Some apps continue to hold customer data even after an account is deleted. Even though I may technically ‘agree’ to the terms and conditions, is this fully informed consent?</p>
<p>One of the big concerns around this kind of medical information being collected is the potential for collaborations with big pharmaceuticals and other health service providers. With apps sitting on a goldmine of users’ fertility and health information, health service providers might mine their data for potential consumers and reach out directly to them. While this is like any targeted marketing campaign, the fact that the advertiser is likely to be offering medical services to women suffering from infertility and are at their most vulnerable, raises totally different ethical concerns.</p>
<p>And these apps and their businesses might grow in directions that users haven’t taken into consideration. Take Ovia’s health feature for companies to buy premium services for their employees. While the gesture is packaged as a goodwill one, it also means that an employer has access to extremely private and intimate medical information about their women employees. And while the data set is anonymised, it is still possible to figure out the identity of users based on specific information. For example, how many women in any company are pregnant at any given time?...</p>
<p>Pregnant a year after my miscarriage, I initially downloaded multiple apps in a bid to find a good fit. I don’t know which one of these was in communication with Facebook. But almost immediately, my Facebook timeline started becoming littered with ads for baby stuff — clothes, shoes bibs, prams, cribs, ointments for stretch marks, maternity wear, the works.</p>
<p>It makes me think of those old school clockwork-style videos. You drop a ball and off it goes: making dominos fall, knocking over pots and pans, setting in motion absurd, synchronized mechanisms. Similarly, I drop my data and watch it hurtle into my life, on to other platforms, off to vendors. Maybe to stalkers? To employers? Who knows.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>
For more details visit <a href='https://cis-india.org/raw/sadaf-khan-data-bleeding-everywhere-a-story-of-period-trackers'>https://cis-india.org/raw/sadaf-khan-data-bleeding-everywhere-a-story-of-period-trackers</a>
</p>
No publishersumandroBodies of EvidenceResearchers at WorkResearchFeaturedPublicationsBD4DBig Data for Development2019-12-06T05:03:09ZBlog EntryD:Coding Digital Natives
https://cis-india.org/digital-natives/d-coding-digital-natives
<b>Nishant Shah was invited for a public talk at the University of California, Los Angeles. He presented the work done on Digital Natives and spoke about questions of participation and resistance. The talk has been featured in the YouTube channel.</b>
<p>Nishant spoke about the ways by which technology revolution and change has been characterised through the question of voice (how technology has enabled for alternative voices to emerge as ways by which they can be heard), question of amplification (what 10 years ago might have been local phenomena are becoming global spectacles) and the question of power (what really happens when voice and amplification comes to an end). <br /><br />Nishant said that in the last three years of revolutions we have also now witnessed this extraordinary thing where lot of promises were made of different kinds of revolution but which never materialised in terms of what they intended to. Citizen action happens but it doesn’t lead into anything concrete. One of the examples from India was the Anna Hazare’s campaign or India’s fight against corruption. There was this immense amount of campaign on the corruption in Indian bureaucracy and political society... the only instance of mass mobilisation that we saw in India in recent times apart from the cricket series...and how the campaign in seven short months has totally disappeared from public discourse.</p>
<p>For more, watch the <strong>video</strong> now:</p>
<iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YvY__z3jN7M" frameborder="0" height="315" width="420"></iframe>
<p> </p>
<p>Date: March 9, 2012<br />Time: 12 to 1 p.m.<br />Venue: Library Conference Center Presentation Room, University of California</p>
<a class="external-link" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvY__z3jN7M">Follow the video on YouTube</a>
<p> </p>
<p>
For more details visit <a href='https://cis-india.org/digital-natives/d-coding-digital-natives'>https://cis-india.org/digital-natives/d-coding-digital-natives</a>
</p>
No publisherpraskrishnaVideoResearchers at WorkDigital Natives2015-05-08T12:30:14ZBlog EntryCyber Fears: What scares Digital Natives and those around them
https://cis-india.org/digital-natives/blog/cyber-fears-what-scares-digital-natives-and-those-around-them
<b>Societies around the world are quickly digitising
...Twitter....
...Facebook...
...Wireless accessible everywhere...
“Digital Natives” are those who have figured how to use these technologies to their full potential
But even they have real fears.
If you are a Digital Native, are related to one or work with/alongside with one come share your fears with us!
Blogathon: Many people bloging together at the same time on a shared topic
Date: Monday April 18th, 2011
On http://digitalnatives.in
</b>
<p>This is the 2nd blogathon of the "Digital Natives with a Cause?" project. <br /><br />A
blogathon is an event where people from all over the world blog about a
shared topic together, at the same time, giving an interesting
cross-cultural snapshot of the issue at hand. <br /><br />We all have
dreams, hopes and aspirations. What are you afraid of? in your personal
life? in your practice? in your politics? or in your ideology?<br /><span class="text_exposed_hide"></span><span class="text_exposed_show"><br />As a young person using digital technologies - what scares you? <br /><br />As someone who is related to a digital native - what scares you? <br /><br />As someone who works with/along digital natives - what scares you? <br /><br />Let's
find out from 1st person accounts what scares young digital people,
what scares their relatives and what scares their co-workers and team
mates. Let's move beyond the stereotypes, the sensationalism and the
mystery which surrounds this exciting concept, the "Digital Native".
Tell us what you think!<br /><br />come share your thoughts along with people from all over the world. <br /><br />Blog together as one in the 2nd blogathon of "Digital Natives with a Cause?". <br /><br />Sample fears: <br /><br />If you are a digital native: <br />Are
you scared of censorship or being denied access to the internet? are
you scared of being stereotyped as geeky or nerdy? are you scared of the
expectations society puts on you? Are you afraid of revealing too much
of yourself online? are you simply afraid that the power might go out in
the middle of the day? <br /><br />If you are the parent / relative of a digital native: <br />Popular
depictions paint older generations as paranoid of the access enjoyed by
digital natives. Is this really true? is it true for you? are you
afraid of what a digital native might be doing online? are you afraid of
new technologies themselves? Do you have any fears that are not being
articulated by current dialogues? <br /><br /><br />If you work with digital natives:<br />
Are you afraid of the easy at which young people use digital
technologies? are you afraid they might be under utilizing the potential
of these tools? <br /></span></p>
<p><br /><span class="text_exposed_show"></span><strong>Date: Monday April 18th, 2011<br />On http://digitalnatives.in<br />email: digitalnatives@cis-india.org<br />or check out the FB event: http://tinyurl.com/6h6vfmy</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>Check out the <a href="https://cis-india.org/digital-natives/blog/uploads/Cyber%20fears.pdf" class="internal-link" title="Cyber fears poster">Cyber fears poster</a><br /><span class="text_exposed_show"></span></p>
<p><span class="text_exposed_show"><br /></span></p>
<p>
For more details visit <a href='https://cis-india.org/digital-natives/blog/cyber-fears-what-scares-digital-natives-and-those-around-them'>https://cis-india.org/digital-natives/blog/cyber-fears-what-scares-digital-natives-and-those-around-them</a>
</p>
No publishertettnerResearchers at WorkDigital Natives2015-05-15T11:45:05ZBlog EntryCSCS Digital Innovation Fund (CDIF)
https://cis-india.org/raw/cscs-digital-innovation-fund
<b>The CSCS Digital Innovation Fund (CDIF) has been set up by the Centre for the Study of Culture and Society (CSCS) and the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS) to encourage, host, and provide seed funding for the development of digital tools and infrastructure for arts, humanities, and social science research in India. The Fund’s priorities have been shaped by Ashish Rajadhyaksha, Lawrence Liang, Nishant Shah, Sitharamam Kakarala, S.V. Srinivas, and Tejaswini Niranjana; and it is administered by the Researchers at Work (RAW) programme at CIS.</b>
<p> </p>
<p>A fundamental challenge has emerged in arts, humanities, and social science research with the coming of digital media. The challenge is of at least two kinds: 1) the ways in which we access our primary materials have changed, opening up the possibility of formulating new problems as well as conducting our research, and 2) additionally, the digital networks and objects that facilitate research are themselves becoming part of the phenomena we document and analyse. While the contexts under investigation are rich and diverse, the digital tools and methods by which to explore them are not readily available, especially in India.</p>
<p>CDIF uses the terms <strong>tools</strong> and <strong>infrastructure</strong> to respectively refer to autonomous software programmes and hardware devices, and platforms for collective use. A software to enable capturing of comments posted on a news website will be an example of the former, while an archive to be populated and annotated by a number of users will be an example of the latter.</p>
<p>The core mandate of CDIF is as follows:</p>
<ul>
<li>Identifying digital tools and infrastructure needed by researchers and practitioners in arts, humanities, and social science fields. This is clearly not a one-time exercise, but a continuous one.</li>
<li>Promote, support, and fund the development of new digital tools and infrastructure, as well as revision and expansion of existing ones.</li>
<li>Creating focused conversations and materials around teaching of, and teaching through, digital tools and infrastructure across the arts, humanities, and social science disciplines.</li></ul>
<p>During 2015-2017, CDIF has a specific interest in supporting efforts that engage with questions of the digital futures of Indian languages, needs and forms of archive-building, and tools and infrastructure of academic collaboration, among learners and among researchers.</p>
<p>CDIF will periodically announce open calls for project proposals related to development of digital tools and infrastructure for research. To receive these announcements, please subscribe to the <a href="https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/cdif" target="_blank">cdif@cis-india.org</a> mailing list. In exceptional cases, we may also consider directly supporting a project.</p>
<p>For any clarification, including sharing of project ideas, please write to raw[at]cis-india[dot]org.</p>
<p>
For more details visit <a href='https://cis-india.org/raw/cscs-digital-innovation-fund'>https://cis-india.org/raw/cscs-digital-innovation-fund</a>
</p>
No publishersumandroCDIFResearchers at WorkLearning2018-05-14T07:25:49ZBlog EntryCreativity, Politics, and Internet Censorship
https://cis-india.org/raw/creativity-politics-and-internet-censorship-20160525
<b>In collaboration with Karnataka for Kashmir, we organised a discussion on 'Creativity, Politics and Internet Censorship' on May 25, 2016. Mahum Shabir, a legal activist and artist, Mir Suhail, political cartoonist with Kashmir Reader and Rising Kashmir, and Habeel Iqbal, a lawyer who has worked with several justice groups in Kashmir, shared some of their work and experiences. This discussion was organised as part of Port of Kashmir 2016, a series of events bringing together a small collective of people using different modes of art and activism to address crucial challenges to free speech and democracy in the state. </b>
<p> </p>
<img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cis-india/website/master/img/MahumShabirHandwara.jpg" alt="null" />
<h6>Mahum Shabir talking about the Handwara case. Source: Swar Thounaojam.</h6>
<p> </p>
<p>The discussion began with Mahum Shabir giving an overview of the work at the Jammu Kashmir Coalition of Civil Society, specifically on the Handwara case. She spoke of the role of the internet, and social media in particular, in perpetuating the gaze of the state, while also bringing up the larger question of how media propagates a certain way of looking at Kashmir, particularly women, marginalised groups and victims of violence. Internet blockades and media censorship pose several obstacles for the circulation of information, resulting in the need for surreptitious ways of communication as a necessary way to counter predominant narratives in the discourse around occupation. The implications of these for the rights of women in particular, the curbs on freedom at different levels, and the undercurrent of violence that is prevalent in everyday life, came up as significant questions.</p>
<p>Mir Suhail presented some of his cartoons, and shared some poignant personal experiences of growing up in a state under military occupation. His works reflect his concerns about a changing society, from understanding strife as an almost normalised state of existence, to now a phase of industrialization and control of resources. He spoke on the politics of exercising creative freedom in the present, and his attempt to encourage conversations on contemporary issues through his art. The role of technology in facilitating these conversations is as crucial as it is contentious, for it also brings up questions of surveillance and privacy;his art tries to navigate through some of these questions in different ways.</p>
<p>Habeel Iqbal, a lawyer who has worked on the Shopian and Handwara cases, spoke on some of the legal aspects of censorship and surveillance related issues in Kashmir, particularly in instances involving social media. He discussed some of the challenges faced by activists, social workers and political groups in working on certain cases, particularly in gathering and circulating information or in writing about sensitive issues. Self-censorship is often the only option for people working on these issues, as he elaborated through some personal experiences.</p>
<p>The discussion included questions on the possibilities opened up by privacy tools, such the use of encryption and to the extent to which they affect communication. Access to these technologies is a factor here; besides, transparency is also a goal for most human rights organisations working in the state. Social media, and social messaging apps in particular often function as an alternative to mainstream media as a means of communication, and it is interesting to see the questions it opens up for censorship. Examples of activism using not just the internet, but the network (through USBs and hard drives) were also discussed. The responses to such forms of activism, from across the world were interesting to engage with, as it tries to tackle predominant perceptions about the state. The economic aspects of different strategies of censorship and surveillance, through curfews and blockades and its broader implications for socio-economic development in the state were also discussed. The talk provided several insights into the problems and challenges to freedom of speech, the censorship of ideas, and its repercussions for creative freedom and politics in Kashmir.</p>
<p> </p>
<img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cis-india/website/master/img/MirSuhailPostcards.jpg" alt="null" />
<h6>Postcards of cartoons by Mir Suhail. Source: Swar Thounaojam.</h6>
<p> </p>
<p>
For more details visit <a href='https://cis-india.org/raw/creativity-politics-and-internet-censorship-20160525'>https://cis-india.org/raw/creativity-politics-and-internet-censorship-20160525</a>
</p>
No publishersneha-ppResearchers at WorkPracticeArtCensorship2016-06-17T07:07:40ZBlog EntryCreative Activism - Voices of Young Change Makers in India (UDAAN)
https://cis-india.org/digital-natives/making-change/young-voices-udaan
<b>This post is a short account of what happened at UDAAN in December 2013 — a conference that gathered 100 youth from across the country to discuss pressing environmental issues and creative strategies to tackle them. We conducted a survey to map the perspectives of these young change-makers and get a glimpse of how India's youth is now framing and going about making 'change'</b>
<div align="center">
<pre><strong><img src="https://cis-india.org/home-images/copy_of_UDAANlogo.jpeg/image_preview" title="logo" height="91" width="400" alt="logo" class="image-inline image-inline" />
CHANGE-MAKERS: </strong>Youth (India)
<strong>
EVENT</strong>: UDAAN 2013 organized by 350 India: a global organization building grassroots movements across the country.
<strong>
METHOD OF CHANGE</strong>: Behavioral change, solidarity networks and creative activism.</pre>
<em>
</em></div>
<em>
</em>
<h3 align="right" style="text-align: right;"><em>“Change or making change is to bring about a paradigm shift in the way we do certain things. To alter our general way of life as it remains now into something that is positive and ideal.”</em></h3>
<p align="justify"><br />This is one of the many responses we collected from UDAAN participants on what it means to make change in India today. So
far, in <a href="https://cis-india.org/digital-natives/making-change/">previous articles</a>, we have looked at organizations working
with specific demographics and themes. On this opportunity, we are
exploring the ideas behind a group conformed by individuals coming from
different walks of life, who embody an array of historical,
linguistic and cultural understandings of the world, yet still find an intersection at their intents for change. We addressed
the core questions raised in the project's thought piece: Whose
Change is it Anyway: <em>“What is the understanding of change with
which we were working? What are the kinds of changes being imagened?
Whose change is it, anyway?”</em> -to start touching base with the ideas
underpinning their actions, and identify how -or whether- it
introduces new ways to define this concept. </p>
<h2>UDAAN 2013</h2>
<p align="justify">I had the privilege of joining this inspiring group during a four day conference and got the opportunity to share with students, activists and entrepreneurs from 13 states of India (chosen from a pool of 2000 applicants) involved in social change practices across the country. Despite the diverging world views among participants, the sense of a common purpose was almost undisputed. Every attendee was committed to mitigate the detrimental impact of climate change in their cities, protect vulnerable populations and advocate for justice. However, the most interesting points of contention lied on how to translate this commitment into individual and collective <em>action, </em>create conditions that enable change, and encourage community participation in environmental, political and social issues.</p>
<p align="JUSTIFY">With these questions in mind, the conference focused on providing strategies of action and the attendees explored all sorts of lobbying and political participation mechanisms through its workshops. Three main elements stood out for me. First, the cocktail of tactics provided by experienced campaigners: from direct resistance and non-violent action to story-telling and street theater; participants were inspired to experiment and re-conceptualize activism.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="https://cis-india.org/home-images/IMG_1972.JPG/image_preview" alt="Space Theatre" title="Space Theatre" class="image-inline image-inline" align="centre" /><br />Space Theatre Ensemble</p>
<p align="center"><img src="https://cis-india.org/home-images/Gamification.jpg/image_preview" title="Gamification" height="266" width="400" alt="Gamification" class="image-inline image-inline" /></p>
<p align="center">Educators Collective</p>
<p align="justify">Second, the use of gamification in the workshops, facilitated by the experiential learning group <a href="https://www.facebook.com/educatorscollective?ref=ts&fref=ts">Educators Collective</a>, was the key to introduce values of leadership, solidarity and sustainability into individual behaviour and team practices. And finally, the add of 'unconference slots' to the program empowered attendees to share their methods, initiatives and projects in an open platform. This fostered peer-to-peer learning and more importantly reinforced the net of support and the immense amount of admiration (that grew exponentially between participants) for each other's work.</p>
<h2 align="JUSTIFY"><strong>Youth and Activism in India</strong></h2>
<p align="JUSTIFY">Coming from the perspective of our research project: <a href="https://cis-india.org/digital-natives/blog/hivos-knowledge-programme-june-14-2013-nishant-shah-whose-change-is-it-anyway">Making Change</a>, it was second nature to me to question frameworks utilized around "making change". I was pleasantly surprised to find an array of perspectives and experiences floating around panels, workshops and keynote presentations. They were definitely seeking consensus, yet in a way that did not inhibit diversity of thought, intellectual curiosity and self-reflection. This sparked the idea of collecting these views and use them as a sample of the current status of youth activism in India. Particularly considering how many of the strategies taught at UDAAN, while incredibly powerful, require a set of resources (including capital, time and energy) that are not readily accessible for all aspiring activists in the country.</p>
<p align="JUSTIFY">These thoughts are consistent with a couple of articles I referred to for context on Indian youth and activism. Starting with the IRIS Knowledge Foundation and the UN-HABITAT's report: <a href="https://cis-india.org/digital-natives/making-change/www.esocialsciences.org/General/A201341118517_19.pdf">"State of the Urban Youth, India 2012: Employment, Livelihoods, Skills"</a>. It states that in only seven years, India will become the youngest country of the world with a median age of 29 years old. This, coupled with the fact that India's youth is the largest group in the working-age population — in a country that is expected to become one of the world's next major economic powers (Ilavasaran, 2013) — has, according to Padma Prakash, led demographers and economists to consider youth as the future of the country's economic growth. Having said that, these promising prospects do not reflect that 87.2% of the unemployed of the country are youth, only 27% of Indian youth is literate and 64% is located in rural areas. These facts display a constant negotiation between precariousness and hope, and particularly the high level of dissonance between the expectations and opportunities surrounding this group. Furthermore, as put by Prakash, despite the amount of economic information we have on this group, we lack a deep understanding of the social constructs underpinning their motivations and actions. On one hand, Ilavasaran suggests precariousness is the trigger behind both their unrest and their activism. On the other, the path they end up taking will depend on how they understand making change and their role within this process.</p>
<p align="JUSTIFY">This dilemma was quite evident at UDAAN. Youth from all over India came together to fervently speak about the grievances climate change is causing in their regions and share the stories behind their struggles. On this note, the conference represented an incubator for their ideas and frustrations. and one of its main goals was to steer all this energy towards a path of constructive positive change. Carpini on his work on civic engagement (2000) outlines three factors that lead to participation: motivation, opportunities and capabilities; and how the interplay of the three result in different patterns of change-making. Hence, what is left to answer is how will this chaotic ecosystem shape youth's ideas of creating change? And to what extent will these conditions determine their motivation, opportunities and capacities of participating in the process? The survey we sent out to participants is only a starting point to reflect on these points. It did not aim to resolve these questions, but instead gather a snapshot of how politically and socially active young citizens are locating change and framing some of the biggest challenges of its generation.</p>
<h2 align="JUSTIFY">Online Survey</h2>
<div>About 25 people participated in the survey. The survey had five questions that explored three concepts analyzed in the Making Change research project: change, civic engagement and methods of change. It was divided into three sections:</div>
<p align="JUSTIFY">a) <strong>Definitions:</strong> Participants were asked how they understand 'change' and 'making change'.</p>
<p align="JUSTIFY">b) <strong>Actors:</strong> Participants were asked to reflect on their role and the role of youth in the process of making change. It also touched on concepts of active citizenship and engagement.</p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><strong>c) Methods: </strong>This section looked at the practices and methods preferred by youth for making change. Participants were asked to think about strategies and tactics discussed at the UDAAN workshops or other initiatives of interest, and how ICT/technology affect the process.</p>
<p align="JUSTIFY">The purpose was to collate as many ideas and perspectives around change-making from this group and hence, the questions were broad and open-ended. The participants remained anonymous and details about their age, religion, region, socio-economic status, etc., were not disclosed. The language barrier and access (and frequency of access) to social media platforms was a big limitation to obtain a larger sample but the responses still reflected interesting patterns, which were later classified and categorized using a keyword system. </p>
<p align="JUSTIFY">The results were displayed on the info-graphics found below:</p>
<ul style="text-align: -webkit-auto;"><li>Infographic 1* reflects the different ways participants outlined change-making: definitions of 'change' and 'making change', type of change (positive, neutral or confrontational), location of change (individual, society or system) and time of change (now, future, long-term).</li><li>Infographics 2* and 3 outline the profiles of a change-maker and an active citizen.</li><li>Infographic 4 lists their preferred methods of change -in no particular order. The bottom section reflects the spectrum of opinions around the use of technology.</li></ul>
<p>*The percentages reflect the portion of respondents who reflected this view and the texts are excerpts of the respondents' answers.</p>
<p align="JUSTIFY">This presentation format was chosen for three reasons: first, to facilitate the consumption of raw data collected from the survey and make visual associations between themes. Second, to put into practice some the recommendations from the storytelling workshop to make research more accessible to the public. And third, as a somewhat self-serving experiment to measure a) the ability of a graphic designer rookie, with no previous experience (like me), to create visual aids and graphics with free online tools, and b) explore empirically some of the methods I have encountered through my research: <a href="https://cis-india.org/digital-natives/making-change/methods-to-conceive-condense-social-change">Methods for Social Change</a>. Hence, the following results will not be of an academic nature as previous posts, but will instead clarify some of the patterns, evident in the original responses, that may have been lost in graphic translation. </p>
<h2>Locating Change: Definitions</h2>
<p style="text-align: right;"><em style="text-align: left;"><strong> "Change is any alteration from an established status-quo. Making change is creating a system that is self-sustaining and capable of surviving over a long period of time"</strong></em></p>
<p>In spite of including both concepts on the same question, most respondents differentiated them in their answers. Approximately 50% of the sample responded 'change' was either an irreversible process or an outcome to a process, while the other 50% implicated themselves in the 'change' process, stating it means to shift and modify how we act and think. A similar spirit was reflected about 'making change'. About 29% of the participants acknowledges a break from previous practices, and 29% considers we are implicated through the adoption of a new model of action. Interestingly enough, only 5% considers making change a duty or a responsibility. This low percentage signals making change is understood as non-compulsory which does not affect active politically involved citizens but leaves the more passive and idle off the hook when it comes to acknowledging their role in the process of change. </p>
<p align="justify">Moving on to type of change: 38% of the respondents consider making change a neutral process that does not guarantee a positive change (as considered by 33% of the sample). It was defined as an event that merely breaks the norm or from usual practices. A possible reading of this is that a group is not mobilizing its efforts with a plausible positive alternative in mind. Instead, it seeks difference without a deeper considerations of <em>how</em> will it differ from the conditions it is breaking from. This fits into the 'politics of hope' paradigm brought up by Shah in the piece: This approach to change and the idiom 'making a difference' is "so infused with the joy of possibilities" that it doesn't evaluate whether the outcome will lead to further assurance or precariousness, when compared to the earlier structure. This approach limits structural, systemic and sustainable change, an issue that was also evident in the results of the time-line. 0% thinks change must be made immediately but the rest of the sample was divided into making plans for the future (19%) and a smaller number on securing a self-sustaining system (10%) to replace the former. </p>
<div align="center"><a href="https://s3.amazonaws.com/easel.ly/all_easels/277883/MakingChange2/image.jpg"><img src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/easel.ly/all_easels/277883/MakingChange2/image.jpg" alt="MakingChange2 title=" height="805" width="628" /></a></div>
<p align="center"><strong> Infographic 1: </strong>Making Change (Generated using: <a style="text-align: left;" href="http://easel.ly">easel.ly-</a>)</p>
<p align="justify">Finally, on the question of where is change located, we find the first instance of a pattern that was evident throughout the survey. On this category 38% finds change must occur externally: either in society and others (19%), or through the shift from a status quo that is perpetuating inequality (19%). Yet the largest group (24%) identified that change must occur internally first. The role of the self was also very prominent in the following sections as well. </p>
<h2>Agents of Change</h2>
<p>After
locating change, the project also intends to understand who are the
main actors and stakeholders lumped into the category of 'citizen' or
'citizen action'. On this survey, these actors were dubbed
'change-makers'. Respondents were free to describe what they
understood by the term and the social construct determining the model
they were working towards (as aspiring change-makers themselves). The
second actor we inquired about was 'active citizen'. The concept of
citizenship is ambiguous terrain, yet there seems to be a connection
between the identity confered by the 'citizen' status and the
respondents' inner call for action. </p>
<h3><strong>a) The Change-Maker:</strong></h3>
<p style="text-align: right;"><strong><em>"I think that all of us can be change-makers. We need to be sure of what and why we need to change and have a vision of how the world will be after making the change</em>"</strong></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY">The Change-Maker (Infographic 2) was defined by the four characteristics outlined below.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="https://s3.amazonaws.com/easel.ly/all_easels/277883/ChangeMaker2/image.jpg"><img src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/easel.ly/all_easels/277883/ChangeMaker2/image.jpg" alt="ChangeMaker2 title=" height="507" width="657" /></a></div>
<p align="center"><strong> Infographic 2</strong>: The Change Maker (Generated using: <a style="text-align: left;" href="http://easel.ly">easel.ly</a> )</p>
<div align="justify">Each characteristic was coupled by actions that reinforce this behaviour. For example, understanding the issue (33%) comes hand-in-hand with inciting motivation through information: <em>'If one aspires to change, then one must first understand what is to be changed, how it is to be changed and what would replace the changed system. The primary step is to realize and acknowledge the problem, educate others and then action” </em>(Anonymous survey respondent, 2013) Another interesting example is how the 28% that identified the individual as the source of change, also recommend self-reflection on how to create the most impact: "[My role as a change-maker is]<em> practicing what I preach and learning to critique myself constructively and in a manner that helps me improve"</em> (Anonymous survey respondent, 2013) This brings a different light to Carpinis categorization of 'capabilities' in social change. It is no longer about participation in an external movement but more about how the individual secures sustained change through his own consistent and coherent behaviour.<br /><br /></div>
<h3><strong>b) The Active Citizen</strong></h3>
<p style="text-align: right;"><em><strong>"An active citizen is who follows the constitution, understands and takes responsibility for himself and for influencing his family and community for the betterment of life's social, economic and environmental issues"</strong></em></p>
<div align="justify">
<div align="right">
<h3></h3>
</div>
<p align="justify">Self-awareness was a key point in how the active citizen was personified. It was one of most emphasized points, placing more responsibility on the role of the citizen as opposed to on the issue at hand. Attitudes such as 'realizing the problem', 'taking responsibility' and 'taking initiative' reflect that the individual is finding motivation on taking ownership of his choices and decision-making power. The individual is focusing less on antagonizing the structure and is instead elevating his identity to a fearless, noble status -the citizen is becoming the hero of its own narrative. This ego-emphasis, is also motivating the citizen to invest on increasing its own knowledge capital and attain a thorough understanding of the issues, to then heighten individual and collective awareness around them. The objective is either local -give back to its community- or normative -work towards justice and equity- but there seems to be consensus on the starting point. </p>
<p align="center"><a href="https://s3.amazonaws.com/easel.ly/all_easels/277883/ActiveCitizen/image.jpg"><img src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/easel.ly/all_easels/277883/ActiveCitizen/image.jpg" alt="ActiveCitizen title=" height="805" width="628" /></a><br /><strong> Infographic 3 -</strong> The Active Citizen (Generated using: <a style="text-align: left;" href="http://easel.ly">easel.ly</a>)</p>
</div>
<h2><strong>Methods for Change</strong></h2>
<p style="text-align: right;"><strong>“<em>By going out there and making the change! Get down and dirty. Then use those examples in the form of story, pictures, etc. and inspire others around you to first change themselves and then help change society!”</em></strong></p>
<div align="justify">Finally, infographic 4 displays a mapping of the methods brought up by participants. Again, awareness and behavioural change were the most popular, placing information and the individual at the epicenter of change-making. The impact of the theater and story telling workshops on participants was also evident, on several mentions to the power of 'artivism'.<br /><br />
<div align="center"><a href="https://s3.amazonaws.com/easel.ly/all_easels/277883/Methods/image.jpg"><img src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/easel.ly/all_easels/277883/Methods/image.jpg" alt="Methods title=" height="840" width="656" /></a></div>
<div align="center">Infographic 4: Methods for Social Change (Generated using: <a style="text-align: left;" href="http://easel.ly">easel.ly</a> )</div>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><br />In regards to communication and technology, I was surprised to find that many respondents find it insufficient. They instead recognize the need for strong offline communities making sure activism online translates into the offline realm. “<em>[online platforms] are vital in building quick connections amongst those who feel alike towards bringing change. But eventually, all struggles for change have to be offline [...] technology could be the first step that eventually leads the path to more offline and personal connections.”</em>(Anonymous survey respondent, 2013) <em>: </em>Others were wary about its power and they recognize it can be used to both help and contain the activist with the same intensity: <em>"Technology can either blind people or give them sight."</em>(Anonymous survey respondent, 2013) These views reflect youth has moved on from the tech hype that pervades the digital activism discourse. The role of technology was not excluded from the conference's tactic package and the group perceives technology as a powerful complement, yet it still places a lot more emphasis on creating sustainable change through education, behaviour and offline interactions than through digital interventions.</p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><em></em></p>
<h2 align="JUSTIFY"><strong>Conclusion</strong></h2>
<p align="JUSTIFY">Comments at the aftermath of the event reflected participants had undergone a collective mental shift on how to create social change. We arrived looking outwards: accustomed to pointing fingers and scouting for common enemies that personify the misdoings of inequality perpetrators. Five days at Fireflies later and after UDAAN's intervention, I can safely say we left looking inwards. We are now determined to seek information and identify the most effective ways to mainstream it and make it accessible; we are impelled to reconnect with our creative and artistic selves and put them at service of communication; we are encouraged to share our personal stories and have them inspire solidarity and movement in our communities, and above all, we will continue to pursue the level of behaviour-action consistency that legitimizes our efforts at making change. The conference turned out to be a very organic experience and it provided all of us with a space to connect with ourselves and one another in a time of growing loneliness and isolation in the digital age.</p>
<p align="JUSTIFY">Furthermore, the
thoughts that surfaced on the survey are important pointers to
continue uncovering what drives civic engagement among youth. Seeing
these activists locate change in the self was a refreshing break from
the times we used to overindulge in the possibilities of
technology-mediated change. It seems that the digital is already so
embedded in our interactions and ecosystems that it has not only has
ceased to be novel, but it is recognized as insufficent, and hence,
the attention has returned back to the user and its offline
communities. With this in mind, the group that attended UDAAN, as
part of the demographic who represents "the promise and future
of India's growth", is taking up the challenge of strengthening
ideas of making change in their networks. Have them succeed, and this
'growth' will be met by a current of better informed, better armed
young activists working to secure a self-sustaining system for the
generations to come. </p>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong>**</strong> Thanks to everyone who participated on the survey, Special mention to UDAAN organizers, Educators Collective and the wonderful UDAAN 2013 group<strong>**</strong></em></div>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><strong><br />Sources:</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>HABITAT, UN. "State of the Urban Youth, India 2012.", (2013)</li>
<li>Ilavarasan, P. Vigneswara. "Community work and limited online activism among India youth." <em>International Communication Gazette</em> 75, no. 3 (2013): 284-299.</li><li><span style="text-align: -webkit-auto;">Shah, Nishant “Whose Change is it Anyways? </span><em style="text-align: -webkit-auto;">Hivos Knowledge Program. (</em><span style="text-align: -webkit-auto;">April 30, 2013).<br /><br /></span></li></ol>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><strong>Resources:</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>Easel.ly: To create and share visual ideas online: <a class="external-link" href="http://www.easel.ly/">www.easel.ly/</a><cite></cite></li>
<li>Info.gram: Create infographics: <a href="http://infogr.am/">infogr.am</a></li>
<li>More on UDAAN: <a class="external-link" href="http://world.350.org/udaan/">http://world.350.org/udaan/</a></li>
<li>More on Global Power Shift (350) - <a class="external-link" href="http://globalpowershift.org/">http://globalpowershift.org/</a> </li></ol>
</div>
<p>
For more details visit <a href='https://cis-india.org/digital-natives/making-change/young-voices-udaan'>https://cis-india.org/digital-natives/making-change/young-voices-udaan</a>
</p>
No publisherdenisseResearchers at WorkMaking ChangeWeb Politics2015-04-14T13:21:22ZBlog EntryCOVID-19 Charter Of Recommendations on Gig Work
https://cis-india.org/raw/covid-19-charter-of-recommendations
<b>Tandem Research and the Centre for Internet and Society organised a webinar on 9 April 2020, with unions representing gig workers and researchers studying labour rights and gig work, to uncover the experiences of gig workers during the lockdown. Based on the discussion, the participants of the webinar have drafted a set of recommendations for government agencies and platform companies to safeguard workers’ well being. Here are excerpts from this charter of recommendation shared with multiple central and state government agencies and platforms companies.</b>
<p> </p>
<em><a href="https://cis-india.org/raw/zothan-mawii-covid-19-and-relief-measures-for-gig-workers-in-india" target="_blank">Summary of discussions</a> from the COVID-19 and Gig Economy webinar, authored by Zothan Mawii, Tandem Research</em>
<hr />
<h3><strong>Contributors</strong></h3>
<ol>
<li>Aayush Rathi, Ambika Tandon and Tasneem Mewa, The Centre for Internet and Society, India</li>
<li>Aditi Surie, Indian Institute for Human Settlements</li>
<li>Anita Gurumurthy and Nandini Chami, IT for Change</li>
<li>Astha Kapoor, Aapti Institute</li>
<li>Dharmendra Vaishnav, Indian Delivery Lions (IDL)</li>
<li>Janaki Srinivasan, International Institute of Information Technology, Bangalore</li>
<li>Kaveri Medappa, University of Sussex</li>
<li>Pradyumna Taduri, Fairwork Foundation</li>
<li>Rakhi Sehgal, Gurgaon Shramik Kendra</li>
<li>Sangeet Jain, Researcher</li>
<li>Shaik Salauddin, Indian Federation of App-based Transport Workers (IFAT)</li>
<li>Shohini Sengupta, Assistant Professor of Research, Jindal School of Banking and Finance</li>
<li>Simiran Lalvani, Independent researcher</li>
<li>Tanveer Pasha, Ola, Taxi 4 Sure and Uber Drivers and Owners’ Association (OTU)</li>
<li>P. Vignesh Ilavarasan, Researcher and professor, IIT Delhi</li>
<li>Vinay Sarathy, United Food Delivery Partners’ Union (UFDPU)</li>
<li>Vinay K. Sreenivasa, Advocate, Alternative Law Forum</li>
<li>Zothan Mawii, Iona Eckstein and Urvashi Aneja, Tandem Research</li></ol>
<h3><strong>Context</strong></h3>
<p>The nationwide lockdown in response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on ‘gig workers’ working for on-demand service platforms such as those providing ride-hailing, home-based work and food delivery services and also e-commerce companies. Those driving for on-demand transportation companies have lost their source of livelihood as services remain suspended.</p>
<p>Workers for on-demand delivery and home-based services, on the other hand, have been deemed “essential” and continue to work although demand has fallen drastically. Earnings for delivery workers have fallen to as low as INR 100-300 per day for a whole day’s work. Workers face a high risk of contracting COVID-19 due to their exposure to multiple customers. Apprehensions are rising after a <a href="https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/pizza-man-who-tested-covid-19-positive-also-delivered-food-for-us-zomato-6365513/" target="_blank">delivery worker for Zomato</a> tested positive for COVID-19 in New Delhi. Demand has fallen further but delivery workers must continue to put themselves and their families’ health and safety at risk with limited or no provisions for personal protective equipment or other safety measures <a href="https://gadgets.ndtv.com/apps/news/swiggy-zomato-customer-advisory-coronavirus-outbreak-covid-19-india-2193038" target="_blank">offered by companies</a>.</p>
<p>The relief works announced by the central and state governments do not specifically provide for ‘gig workers’. At the same time, the measures announced by on-demand service companies are inadequate, ambiguous and inconsistent. The eligibility, manner and quantum of relief and the process of availing relief is unclear to workers.</p>
<p>We urge you to bolster the socio-economic and healthcare protections for ‘gig workers’ in India in light of the outbreak of COVID-19. Any efforts aimed at directing relief to ‘gig workers’ will have to be combined, involving the central and state governments and on-demand service companies.</p>
<p>We suggest that the measures adopted incorporate the recommendations outlined below. The recommendations have been drafted after discussion between civil society actors including labour unions from delivery and transportation sectors, researchers, and activists. A summary of the discussions leading to this charter of recommendations can be found <a href="https://cis-india.org/raw/zothan-mawii-covid-19-and-relief-measures-for-gig-workers-in-india" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<h3><strong>Charter of Recommendation on Gig Work</strong></h3>
<p><img src="https://cis-india.org/raw/covid19-charter-image-1/" alt="null" width="85%" /></p>
<p><img src="https://cis-india.org/raw/covid19-charter-image-2/" alt="null" width="85%" /></p>
<p><img src="https://cis-india.org/raw/covid19-charter-image-3/" alt="null" width="85%" /></p>
<p> </p>
<p>
For more details visit <a href='https://cis-india.org/raw/covid-19-charter-of-recommendations'>https://cis-india.org/raw/covid-19-charter-of-recommendations</a>
</p>
No publisherAayush Rathi and Ambika TandonResearchers at WorkGig WorkDigital LabourCovid19ResearchPlatform-WorkFuture of WorkFeaturedNetwork EconomiesHomepage2020-05-13T08:53:02ZBlog Entry Consultative Meeting for a Digital Archive Lab
https://cis-india.org/raw/consultative-meeting-for-a-digital-archive-lab
<b>A meeting for a digital archive lab was held at the Centre for Community Knowledge, Ambedkar University in New Delhi on May 20, 2017. P.P. Sneha participated in the meeting. </b>
<p style="text-align: justify; ">The proposed Digital Archive initiative at AUD will work as an interdisciplinary archive, working across schools and divisions. There is a need to create a specialized set of skills within AUD for archiving, cataloguing, digitization and conservation. This consultative meeting is envisaged for identifying skills and staff needs, timeframe, direction, outreach and a support network. Outcomes of this consultative meeting will help to finalise the resources required for setting up an online archival platform on the AUD server. <a class="external-link" href="http://cis-india.org/internet-governance/files/consultative-meeting-for-digital-archive-lab.pdf">Click </a>to see the agenda.</p>
<p>
For more details visit <a href='https://cis-india.org/raw/consultative-meeting-for-a-digital-archive-lab'>https://cis-india.org/raw/consultative-meeting-for-a-digital-archive-lab</a>
</p>
No publisherpraskrishnaResearchers at Work2017-06-08T13:07:57ZNews ItemConsultation on Figures of Learning in the Digital Context - Report
https://cis-india.org/raw/digital-humanities/consultation-new-figures-of-learning-in-digital-context
<b>The Researchers at Work (RAW) programme at the Centre for Internet and Society organised a consultation on ‘Figures of Learning in the Digital Context’ on September 22, 2014 in Bangalore. </b>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conducted as part of its ‘Making Methods for Digital Humanities’ project, the discussion was an attempt to examine changes in the learning environment with the advent of digital technologies and new modes of knowledge production by mapping concepts and changes around a set of figures of learning, old and new, to understand the discursive shifts that produce and locate them in the contemporary moment. (See the <a href="https://cis-india.org/raw/events/consultation-on-new-figures-of-learning-in-digital-context" class="external-link">concept note here</a>).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Making Methods project seeks to make specific interventions in structures of learning, methods of storing and documenting information, and processes of interaction and interface design, in an effort to describe and queer the contours of what we understand as the field of Digital Humanities today.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The consultation brought together a small but diverse set of people from different fields. Participants presented on figures of learning drawn from their own fields of research and practice. Archana Prasad, artist and founder of <a href="http://jaaga.in/">JAAGA,</a> Bangalore spoke about the organisation and its growth as an alternative space for learning through collaborative processes in art, design and technology – the studio space made of pallet racks, its various projects and groups that converge at JAAGA reflect this diversity and interdisciplinarity. She spoke about changes in her own role from being a facilitator for diverse groups to come together, to becoming more of a mentor in the later years, the problems of sustainability of such a space and the efforts made through different projects in emphasising learning though peer-to-peer methods. Interesting projects in focus were the participatory artwork and reality game called <a href="http://investmentzone.info/">Investmentzone</a> which is an effort to collaboratively work and transform public spaces and the JAAGA residential study programme. The discussions were useful in understanding processes that can be used to foster alternative and participatory learning environments.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Asim Siddiqui, Ph.D. student at the <a href="http://barefootphilosophers.wordpress.com/">Manipal Centre for Philosophy and Humanities</a>, used the figure of the ‘performer’ to talk about his research enquiry into the philosophy of performative art traditions and the role of the body, performance and practice in learning. He spoke about the relative passivity of the body in the classroom, and the predominance of certain normative discourses within which teaching-learning practices operate and therefore produce a sort of instrumental form of knowledge, which he found problematic. He drew from examples of embodied action in dance, theatre and music to look at how some of these nuances and conflicts may be brought into classroom pedagogy to make it more illustrative and inclusive. This led to an interesting discussion around problems with current teaching-learning practices and the lack of adequate measures to make them contextual and relevant to students’ lived experience. The digital now bringing in a different dimension to learning and the lack of an understanding of the body in the digital space as preventing the possibility of a somatic element to knowledge was also discussed. The problem of disciplinary constraints and the separation of humanities and social sciences came up with reference to technology becoming more prominent in classrooms.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Bitasta Das, instructor and coordinator of the <a href="http://www.iisc.ernet.in/ug/">UG Humanities programme</a> at the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore spoke further on this issue of separation of the disciplines from her experience of teaching in the UG programme. Her presentation on the ‘distracted inventor’ focussed on the role of technology in the classroom, and how there is a need for teachers to constantly innovate to keep students engaged, particularly in a course such as this. The notion of distraction was a useful contrast to the attention economy debates that have become increasingly prevalent. The possibility of distraction as serendipitous and productive, particularly in science which is also a space of invention and discovery was discussed as one way of taking the idea forward. Some of the work done by students in the programme, under the larger rubric of integration of disciplines, was also presented in the consultation.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Nishant Shah presented on the idea of the production of error in computing, which is also the result of a deliberate and long process or history which can be traced from scribes copying texts to print culture and now to the machine itself, which also produces or re-produces error. He spoke about the gap between the interface and the information that a person consumes in the digital context, which is contrary to what is understood by abbreviations such as Garbage In Garbage Out (GIGO). He sought to critically examine this notion of transparency that the digital supposedly provides, when in effect the notion of error is as much present, but is being effectively effaced in various ways. The production of error therefore is an interesting process in signifying the limits of knowledge, and he proposed the idea of using the figure of the hipster to further explore this process of error or the glitch as a productive one.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Ekta Mittal , media practitioner and one of the founder-members of the media and arts collective <a href="http://maraa.in/about/our-team/">Maraa</a> presented on the figure of the worker, drawing on her research and work on a film on the Bangalore Metro construction workers. The attempt was to break through the existing discourse and simple binaries to present multiple meanings of the city, migrant labour, development, and new narratives of freedom and pleasure. Through documentation of the lives of labourers who belong to different parts of the country and their stories of migration, some of them illegal, and the question of identity and livelihood the film tries to dislocate the figure of the worker from a certain predominant discourse of the marginalised and invisible. The figure of the worker as a ghost, poet, wanderer, and now a lurker who often favours his condition of anonymity and invisibility is something that the presentation also focussed on as a way to take these ideas forward.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The consultation brought together a small but interesting set of people and ideas, this time specifically looking at diverse art and classroom teaching - learning practices. It also brought to the fore several unconventional processes of learning such as gamification, distraction, performance and embodied action that are outside the traditional notion of learning in the context of digital technologies. These ideas would contribute to further initiatives in engaging with larger questions about technology and processes of knowledge production.</p>
<p>
For more details visit <a href='https://cis-india.org/raw/digital-humanities/consultation-new-figures-of-learning-in-digital-context'>https://cis-india.org/raw/digital-humanities/consultation-new-figures-of-learning-in-digital-context</a>
</p>
No publishersnehaResearchResearchers at WorkDigital KnowledgeFigures of Learning2015-11-13T05:37:04ZBlog EntryConsultation on Figures of Learning in the Digital Context
https://cis-india.org/raw/consultation-on-new-figures-of-learning-in-digital-context
<b>The Centre for Internet and Society welcomes you to a consultation on new figures of learning in the digital context at its office in Bangalore on September 22, 2014 from 2 p.m. to 6 p.m.</b>
<p> </p>
<p>The increasing prevalence of the internet and digital technologies today has engendered a new kind of learning environment, which is connected and collaborative, yet also focussed on the individual, with an emphasis on practice. The pervasive influence of technology in teaching-learning practice has also resulted in new tools, processes and platforms, which have added dimensions to learning, and led to the creation of new bodies of knowledge in the digital context. These new figures, spaces, objects and processes, often challenge and inflate given notions of expertise and authority, increasingly locating them outside the familiar framework of the university and a traditional classroom-based approach to learning.</p>
<p>While the processes of knowledge production have been rapidly changing in the last couple of decades, some examples being data mining, distant reading, cultural mapping and design thinking as new ways of parsing, organising, curating and processing information or knowledge, traditionally the point of reference for authoritative ‘figures’ of learning remains the same. These are that of the teacher, facilitator, reader, student, participant etc. However, with the emergence of such new processes of knowledge-making which are largely located in the digital context, one can see the presence of some non-traditional figures of knowledge as well – such as the geek, hacker, blogger, story-teller, worker, designer, activist etc. There are figures which, consciously or unconsciously subvert and redefine certain conventions of knowledge-making practices, by inventing new terms or redefining old ones. More importantly, the emergence of this nomenclature is symptomatic of a change in the predominant discourse that constitutes a particular kind of ‘digital subject’ or entity that inhabits the digital in a particular way.</p>
<p>The present consultation is an exercise to map these concepts and changes around a set of figures of learning, old and new, to understand the discursive shifts that produce them and locate them in the contemporary moment. Participants from diverse areas of research and practice would be invited to make a short ten minute presentation on one such figure, drawn from their area of interest and work, and examine the concepts or notions behind them. This will be followed by group discussions and a 30 minute writing sprint at the end of the consultation to consolidate the discussion.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>
For more details visit <a href='https://cis-india.org/raw/consultation-on-new-figures-of-learning-in-digital-context'>https://cis-india.org/raw/consultation-on-new-figures-of-learning-in-digital-context</a>
</p>
No publisherpraskrishnaRAW EventsDigital KnowledgeResearchFigures of LearningResearchers at WorkEvent2015-11-13T05:39:00ZEventConsultation on 'Digital Futures of Indian Languages'
https://cis-india.org/raw/digital-futures-of-indian-languages-2015
<b>A consultation on 'digital futures of Indian languages' will be held at the CIS office in Bangalore on December 12, 2015, to generate ideas and structure the Indian languages focus area of the CSCS Digital Innovation Fund (CDIF). It is being led by Dr. Tejaswini Niranjana, Centre for the Study of Culture and Society (CSCS), and Tanveer Hasan, A2K programme at CIS; and is supported by CDIF.</b>
<p> </p>
<h2>A Consultation to Generate Ideas for the CSCS Digital Innovation Fund (CDIF)</h2>
<p>We at the Centre for the Study of Culture and Society, Bangalore; Centre for Indian Languages in Higher Education, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai; and Access to Knowledge Programme, Centre for Internet and Society, Bangalore, have between us more than a decade-long experience in the field of Indian languages for higher education and Indic language computing. Together we have, over the past ten years, produced new research and incubated innovative pilot projects to stimulate the use of Indian languages in higher education, especially in the context of a widening linguistic divide in that sphere.</p>
<p>As a new phase in this process, we would like to explore the possible digital futures of Indian languages. Already, there have been many interesting but sporadic attempts at digitization of Indian language text resources and development of software for translation between Indian languages and a host of Indian language support platforms for web-based services. While this momentum is impressive, a lot more remains to be done, when seen against the backdrop of the surging demand for Indian language computational tools, especially those with potential for knowledge-use, that is, tools which could be used by students, teachers, researchers, media analysts, self-learners, bibliographers, librarians, archivists, collectors and the public at large.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://cis-india.org/raw/cscs-digital-innovation-fund" target="_blank">CSCS Digital Innovation Fund</a> is looking to help set up new platforms that aid in generating, processing and making available a wide range of born-digital content. Under the CDIF, the Indian Languages initiative will support the development of new technological aids, apps, software programmes, websites, DYI digitisation devices, and any other project which will enrich the digital use of Indian languages.</p>
<p>We are organising this national consultation with the intention of bringing together people who have been or would like to be involved in such initiatives. We expect each participant to make a short 10-15 minute presentation on an idea they would like to develop, to take part in the general discussions, and to offer feedback to other speakers. We hope to learn from these conversations so that our own research and initiative development will benefit from the inputs as also to contribute to the conversation in such a way that isolated practices, innovations and opportunities are given a platform for greater generalisation and scalability.</p>
<p>- <em><strong>Tejaswini Niranjana, Ashwin Kumar AP, and Tanveer Hasan</strong></em></p>
<p> </p>
<p>
For more details visit <a href='https://cis-india.org/raw/digital-futures-of-indian-languages-2015'>https://cis-india.org/raw/digital-futures-of-indian-languages-2015</a>
</p>
No publishersumandroLanguageCDIFLearningIndic ComputingResearchers at WorkEvent2016-01-15T06:10:57ZEventComments to the United Nations Human Rights Commission Report on Gender and Privacy
https://cis-india.org/internet-governance/blog/comments-to-the-unhrc-report-on-gender-and-privacy
<b>This submission to UNHRC presents a response by researchers at the CIS to ‘gender issues arising in the digital era and their impacts on women, men and individuals of diverse sexual orientations gender identities, gender expressions and sex characteristics’. It was prepared by Aayush Rathi, Ambika Tandon, and Pallavi Bedi in response to a report of consultation by a thematic taskforce established by the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Privacy on ‘Privacy and Personality’ (hereafter, HRC Gender Report).</b>
<p> </p>
<h4>HRC Gender Report - Consultation version: <a href="https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Privacy/SR_Privacy/2019_HRC_Annex2_GenderReport.pdf" target="_blank">Read</a> (PDF)</h4>
<h4>Submitted comments: <a href="http://cis-india.org/internet-governance/files/comments-to-the-united-nations-human-rights-commission-report-on-gender-and-privacy" target="_blank">Read</a> (PDF)</h4>
<hr />
<p>The Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), India, is an 11-year old non-profit organisation that undertakes interdisciplinary research on internet and digital technologies from policy and academic perspectives. Through its diverse initiatives, CIS explores, intervenes in, and advances contemporary discourse and regulatory practices around internet, technology, and society in India,and elsewhere. Current focus areas include cybersecurity, privacy, freedom of speech, labour and artificial intelligence. CIS has been taking efforts to mainstream gender across its programmes, as well as develop specifically gender-focused research using a feminist approach.</p>
<p>CIS appreciates the efforts of Dr. Elizabeth Coombs, Chair, Thematic Action Stream Taskforce on “A better understanding of privacy”, and those of Professor Joseph Cannataci, Special Rapporteur on the Right to Privacy. We are also grateful for the opportunity to put forth our views and comment on the HRC Gender Report.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>
For more details visit <a href='https://cis-india.org/internet-governance/blog/comments-to-the-unhrc-report-on-gender-and-privacy'>https://cis-india.org/internet-governance/blog/comments-to-the-unhrc-report-on-gender-and-privacy</a>
</p>
No publisherAayush Rathi, Ambika Tandon and Pallavi BediPrivacyGenderInternet GovernanceResearchGender, Welfare, and PrivacyResearchers at Work2019-12-30T17:40:20ZBlog EntryComments on the RBI's Consultation Paper on Peer to Peer Lending
https://cis-india.org/raw/comments-on-the-rbi-consultation-paper-on-peer-to-peer-lending
<b>The Reserve Bank of India published a Consultation Paper on Peer to Peer Lending on April 28, 2016, and invited comments from the public. CIS submitted the following response, authored by Elonnai Hickok, Pavishka Mittal, Sumandro Chattapadhyay, Vidushi Marda, and Vipul Kharbanda.</b>
<p> </p>
<h2>1. Preliminary</h2>
<p><strong>1.1.</strong> This submission presents comments and recommendations by the Centre for Internet and Society (<strong>“CIS”</strong>) on the Consultation Paper on Peer to Peer Lending (<strong>“the consultation paper”</strong>) by the Reserve Bank of India (<strong>“RBI”</strong>) <strong>[1]</strong>.</p>
<h2>2. The Centre for Internet and Society</h2>
<p><strong>2.1.</strong> The Centre for Internet and Society, CIS <strong>[2]</strong>, is a non-profit organisation that undertakes interdisciplinary research on internet and digital technologies from policy and academic perspectives. The areas of focus include digital accessibility for persons with diverse abilities, access to knowledge, intellectual property rights, openness (including open data, free and open source software, open standards, open access, open educational resources, and open video), internet governance, telecommunication reform, digital privacy, and cyber-security. The academic research at CIS seeks to understand the reconfiguration of social processes and structures through the internet and digital media technologies, and vice versa.</p>
<p><strong>2.2.</strong> This submission is consistent with CIS’ commitment to safeguarding general public interest, and the interests and rights of various stakeholders involved. The comments in this submission aim to further the concerns of citizens’ and users’ rights in the context of products, services, and transactions facilitated by digital media technologies, the , the principle that regulation should be defined around functions of the acts concerned, and not the technologies of delivery. Our comments are limited to the clauses that most directly have an impact on these concerns.</p>
<h2>3. Response</h2>
<h3>3.1. Whether there is a felt need for regulating peer to peer lending platforms?</h3>
<p><strong>3.1.1.</strong> Peer to peer (<strong>“P2P”</strong>) lenders are platforms serving as marketplaces for the lenders and the borrowers of funds to connect. Their very business model does not render them as a provider of finance, as they aspire to function as pure intermediaries to enable lending and borrowing.</p>
<p><strong>3.1.2.</strong> The Section 45I.(f)(iii) of the RBI Act, 1935 <strong>[3]</strong>, provides RBI the authority to classify any financial institution as a non-banking financial company (<strong>“NBFC”</strong>) “with the previous approval of the Central Government and by notification in the Official Gazette.” Since the P2P lending platforms do not provide any finance themselves, undertake acquisition of financial instruments, deliver financial and/or insurance services, or collect financial resources directly, the only ground for classifying such companies as “financial institutions” <strong>[4]</strong> appears to be their involvement in “managing, conducting or supervising, as foreman, agent or in any other capacity, of chits or kuries as defined in any law which is for the time being in force in any State, or any business, which is similar thereto” <strong>[5]</strong>. P2P lending platforms can be considered to be brokers and thus there are other aspects that merit scrutiny such as antitrust issues, obligations of either party, company activities and the transactional system involved, as we will discuss in this document.</p>
<p><strong>3.1.3.</strong> The consultation paper itself states that the balance sheet of the platform cannot indicate any borrowing / lending activity, which entails that the platform cannot itself provide finance or receive any funds for the provision of loans to others. Platforms are not allowed to determine the interest rates as they are not a party to the transaction. Neither would they be liable in cases of default by the borrower. These rules, standard for P2P platforms in other jurisdictions as well, confirm the assumption that the platform itself is not providing finance and thus, cannot be entrusted with any liability, obligation from the transaction.</p>
<p><strong>3.1.4.</strong> Further, with RBI raising the threshold asset size for an NBFC to be considered systemically important (NBFC-ND-SI) from Rs. 100 Crores to Rs. 500 Crores <strong>[6]</strong>, and Economic Times reporting that one of the biggest Indian P2P lending platform’s enterprise valuation (which can be taken as indicative of its net assets) is Rs 50 Crores <strong>[7]</strong>, we may assume that most P2P lending platforms will have net assets worth less than 500 crore, at least in the near future; although there is a possibility for exponential growth with some companies.</p>
<p><strong>3.1.5.</strong> Given the limited sphere of operation, restricted ability (by design) of these platforms to shape interest rates and other features of financial instruments, and their generally non-systemically-important nature, we would submit that the regulation of such P2P lending platforms are kept to an absolute minimum, so that their economic viability is not undermined, and at the same time the key risks associated with their operations are addressed by RBI.</p>
<h3>3.2. Is the assessment of P2P lending and risks associated with it adequate?</h3>
<p><strong>3.2.1.</strong> CIS observes that the following are the key risks involved with the operations of the P2P lending platforms, and these are being respectively addressed by, or can be addressed by RBI in the following manners.</p>
<ol type="A"><li><strong>Insufficient information about the conditions of lending, leading to defrauding of the borrower:</strong> The borrower may not receive appropriate information about the terms of the loan, and/or the P2P lending platform may not act in a “fair” manner (say, in case of collusion between the P2P lending platform and the lender, or the lending platform and the borrower), which may lead to defrauding and/or economic loss of either party. By classifying P2P lending platforms as NBFCs, RBI will ensure that these companies follow the Guidelines on Fair Practices Code for NBFCs <strong>[8]</strong>, which extensively addresses concerns related to this type of risks.<br /><br /></li>
<li><strong>Insufficient information about the borrower, or her/his ability to repay the loan, may lead to non-repayment and economic loss of the lender:</strong> If the P2P lending platform allows the lender to offer loans to borrowers without acquiring and/or providing sufficient information to the lender about the borrower’s credit history and/or ability to repay the loan, modes of formulating security for loans, this may heighten the risks of non-repayment of loans. By classifying P2P lending platforms as NBFCs, RBI will ensure that these companies follow the Master Circular – 'Know Your Customer' (KYC) Guidelines – Anti Money Laundering Standards (AML) - Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Obligations of NBFCs <strong>[9]</strong>, which extensively addresses concerns related to this type of risks.<br /><br /></li>
<li><strong>Credit-related information of the lenders and the borrowers collected by P2P lending platforms may not be made available to other financial institutions and that will lead asymmetry in credit information available across various actors in the sector:</strong> Credit information, related to both lending and borrowing practices of entities using the platform concerned, is a key asset of the P2P lending platforms. Lack of sharing of such information with Credit Information Companies, for economic reasons or otherwise, may however, lead to information asymmetry within the financial sector, which will structurally weaken the entire sector (with pieces of credit information being distributed across actors and not being shared internally). By classifying P2P lending platforms as NBFCs, RBI will ensure that these companies follow the Credit Information Companies (Regulation) Act, 2005 <strong>[10]</strong>, which extensively addresses concerns related to this type of risks.<br /><br /></li>
<li><strong>P2P lending platforms diversifying their financial operations without informing RBI and hence without appropriate regulatory control:</strong> It is possible that P2P lending platforms may decide to diversify their activities. There have been similar examples in other related sectors, say e-commerce marketplaces, that have started their own product re/selling companies that use the same online marketplace concerned. By classifying P2P lending platforms as NBFCs, RBI will ensure that these companies provide RBI with detailed and regular reports of their economic activities and investments, which is expected to address concerns related to this type of risks.</li></ol>
<h3>3.3. Are there any other risks which ought to be addressed?</h3>
<p><strong>3.3.1.</strong> CIS observes that as part of the usual transaction related activities of the P2P lending platforms, the companies will come into possession of what has been defined as “sensitive personal data or information” by the Information Technology (Reasonable security practices and procedures and sensitive personal data or information) Rules, 2011 <strong>[11]</strong>. The concerns related to this type of risk is directly addressed by the Rules concerned, and may not require additional attention from the RBI.</p>
<p><strong>3.3.2.</strong> CIS observes that as borrowers and lenders start using specific P2P lending platforms, the data regarding their credit histories and/or “financial reputation” will be owned by these companies. While such information might be shared internally within the financial sector through the Credit Information Companies, the borrowers and lenders themselves may not get direct access to such data. Hence, the borrowers and lenders will not be able to move easily and smoothly to a new P2P lending platform and make use of their existing credit information and/or “financial reputation” when accessing services offered via the new P2P lending platform. In other words, the borrowers and lenders may face a <em>service provider lock-in</em>, and inability to move between P2P lending platforms easily, without explicit access to their own credit history/reputation, and will not have the ability to migrate such information from one P2P lending platform to another (or to any other agency, for that matter). CIS submits that RBI must provide a mechanism to allow users to migrate between platforms as it has not been discussed in the consultation paper.</p>
<h3>3.4. Is the proposed approach to regulating these platforms adequate?</h3>
<p><strong>3.4.1.</strong> CIS observes that while classification of P2P lending platforms will appropriately address key risks associated with their operations (as listed in 3.2.1. A-D), it will not address a major risk emerging out of their operations that is unique to the technological basis of the business concerned (as mentioned in 3.3.2.), and further, it will impose substantial financial and management obligations that have a very high probability of undermining the economic viability of this emerging and niche sector of intermediated direct lending and borrowing.</p>
<p><strong>3.4.2.</strong> CIS observes that these financial and management obligations may involve the following topics among others discussed: 1) minimum net worth requirement for registration, 2) minimum investments required to be made government securities, 3) transferring of minimum percentage of net profits to RBI, 4) guidelines regarding corporate governance <strong>[12]</strong>, etc.</p>
<p><strong>3.4.3.</strong> Given this, CIS submits that instead of classifying P2P lending platforms as “Misc NBFCs,” a new sub-classification is created under the category of NBFC for such platforms, that directly addresses the key risks associated with businesses of P2P lending platforms, and protects lenders as well as borrowers while enhancing transparency in operations. This new sub-classification of P2P lending companies should also be divided into systemically-important and non-systemically-important like other NBFCs, and requirements regarding financial operations and corporate management should only be enforced for the former category of P2P lending companies.</p>
<h3>3.5. Any other relevant issues pertaining to P2P lending</h3>
<p>Beyond the issues already discussed above, CIS seek clarity from the RBI around the following aspects:</p>
<ol><li><strong>Transactional system pertaining to P2P lending:</strong>
<ol type="a">
<li>What are the requirements and prerequisites for mandating the collection of user identity?</li>
<li>Establishing a maximum sum that can be transferred per transaction.</li></ol>
</li>
<li><strong>Company activities:</strong>
<ol type="a"><li>Fees that can be charged by platforms.</li>
<li>How data security can be best addressed.</li>
<li>How the financial transactions are brokered.</li>
<li>Modes of redressal.</li>
<li>Restitution to users if something goes amiss in the transaction.</li>
<li>Insurance that the company has to buy or capital on hand to support.</li></ol>
</li></ol>
<p> </p>
<h2>Endnotes</h2>
<p><strong>[1]</strong> See: <a href="https://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/bs_viewcontent.aspx?Id=3164">https://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/bs_viewcontent.aspx?Id=3164</a>.</p>
<p><strong>[2]</strong> See: <a href="http://cis-india.org/">http://cis-india.org/</a>.</p>
<p><strong>[3]</strong> See: <a href="https://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Publications/PDFs/RBIA1934170510.pdf">https://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Publications/PDFs/RBIA1934170510.pdf</a>.</p>
<p><strong>[4]</strong> See Section 45I.(c) of RBI Act, 1923, last amended on January 07, 2013.</p>
<p><strong>[5]</strong> See Section 45I.(c)(v) of RBI Act, 1923, last amended on January 07, 2013.</p>
<p><strong>[6]</strong> See: <a href="https://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/content/pdfs/PNNBFC200315.pdf">https://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/content/pdfs/PNNBFC200315.pdf</a>.</p>
<p><strong>[7]</strong> See: <a href="http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/startups/faircent-com-raises-pre-series-a-funding-of-250k/articleshow/47630279.cms">http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/startups/faircent-com-raises-pre-series-a-funding-of-250k/articleshow/47630279.cms</a>.</p>
<p><strong>[8]</strong> See: <a href="https://rbi.org.in/scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=7866">https://rbi.org.in/scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=7866</a>.</p>
<p><strong>[9]</strong> See: <a href="https://rbi.org.in/scripts/BS_ViewMasCirculardetails.aspx?id=8168">https://rbi.org.in/scripts/BS_ViewMasCirculardetails.aspx?id=8168</a>.</p>
<p><strong>[10]</strong> See: <a href="http://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/Pages/acts/credit-information-companies-act.aspx">http://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/Pages/acts/credit-information-companies-act.aspx</a>.</p>
<p><strong>[11]</strong> See: <a href="http://deity.gov.in/sites/upload_files/dit/files/GSR313E_10511%281%29.pdf">http://deity.gov.in/sites/upload_files/dit/files/GSR313E_10511%281%29.pdf</a>.</p>
<p><strong>[12]</strong> See: <a href="https://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/BS_NBFCNotificationView.aspx?Id=3706">https://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/BS_NBFCNotificationView.aspx?Id=3706</a>.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>
For more details visit <a href='https://cis-india.org/raw/comments-on-the-rbi-consultation-paper-on-peer-to-peer-lending'>https://cis-india.org/raw/comments-on-the-rbi-consultation-paper-on-peer-to-peer-lending</a>
</p>
No publishersumandroPrivacyReserve Bank of IndiaData ProtectionResearchNetwork EconomiesP2P LendingResearchers at Work2016-06-01T20:21:13ZBlog Entry