Centre for Internet and Society

Ideology and ICT Policies

Shyam Ponappa — 2012-05-10T10:21:49Z

For better policies, decision-makers need to know their own and others’ biases, and consider what others are doing, writes Shyam Ponappa in an article published in the Business Standard on 4 November 2010.

Why do the same facts regarding people’s needs for ICT infrastructure give rise to different policies? Apart from problematic motivation such as malicious intent and opportunism, even well-intentioned policy-makers may prescribe entirely divergent solutions for a given situation. This is evident if one compares India’s broadband policies with those of most countries. There are at least two reasons for this: differing perceptions of the facts, and differences in underlying beliefs and assumptions, i.e. ideology, as distinct from objective data.

Consider the facts of India’s ICT space. In one sense, there has been spectacular success in the communications sector. One statistic cited as evidence is the phenomenal increase in mobile phone subscriptions (over 12 million in September 2010). Equally, to those who focus on aspects like the shortfall in services outside the big cities and towns, or the meagre broadband coverage and its inaccessibility in rural areas (i.e. in much of the country), the communications sector falls tragically short of its potential, and requires policy change.

In this time of India Rising interrupted by the Great Recession, there is a stark contrast between the orientation of our ICT policies and that of most other countries. One area is the extent of government intervention and spending on broadband development. Governments of most advanced economies have stepped in to dramatically improve their broadband networks and policies for user access. This is not only in the EU where, historically, the approach is that government acts to extend consumer welfare, but also in America, the UK and Australia, which are considered much more free-market-oriented in their approach, and in many countries in Asia, including China. Unlike in America since Reagan, regulatory intervention in Europe is part of more supportive policies at the national and local levels. But this time around, even America has embarked on a comprehensive Broadband Technology Opportunities Program, with the goals of providing access to users in unserved areas, improving access in underserved areas, supporting public interest schemes for broadband access, improving broadband use by public safety agencies, and stimulating demand for broadband, economic growth and jobs; there is also a separate Rural Utilities Service.*(Click for graph)

With regard to underlying assumptions and beliefs, an analysis on how economic doctrines affect policies by Robert D Atkinson of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation offers a way to think through alternatives for better decisions.** His analysis is on ICT, although it can be applied to all sectors. To quote from his conclusion, for advocates and policy-makers, “differences over doctrine cause partisans to view facts differently and to focus on small segments of complex debates, leading to a breakdown of constructive dialog and much ‘talking past each other’.”

He summarises four ideologies or economic doctrines:

Conservative Neoclassical (CNC)
Liberal Neoclassical (LNC)
Neo-Keynesian (NK)

Innovation Economics, also called structuralist-evolutionary, neo-Schumpeterian, or evolutionary economics (IE)

While he describes differences in nuanced detail, the simplified abstractions rendered as a logic tree in the accompanying diagram (above) show how economic beliefs affect network policies.

CNCs are characterised as being less concerned with fairness, and less likely to expect market failures. Therefore, network and broadband markets in which governments do not intervene are considered to be competitive, and require no unbundling or price prescriptions. Their bias is for pure competition.

LNCs are more concerned with fairness, as are NKs and IEs. They accept that telecommunication markets are not competitive, and that there may be market failures. LNCs and NKs would use policy to increase competition in different ways. LNCs expect more competition to lead to increased consumer surpluses. LNCs favour regulated competition, viewing more competition as better. NKs want more competition through directed government subsidies, e.g. for municipal broadband or to small companies (which they consider less rapacious than large corporations).

IEs believe broadband markets have economies of scale, and that increased competition could result in excessive and redundant investments. They consider duplication of existing, expensive infrastructure as inefficient investment. IEs view communications infrastructure as a “general purpose technology” that drives economic activity, innovation and productivity. Therefore, they advocate policies that invest in higher-speed broadband, and in extending network services to more people, favouring a national broadband policy. The US National Broadband Plan defines broadband as a “Transformative General Purpose Technology”, and most countries practise IE. Irrespective of their economic philosophies, most countries have embarked on an aggressive broadband plan.

In comparison, India’s approach does not fit any of these categories. There are no policy incentives for broadband, and actions like the spectrum auctions this year indicate a focus on collecting government revenues rather than on facilitating communication services. Whereas the OECD countries and other Asian economies are working on network resource-sharing schemes, India seems to have previous-generation preoccupations: revenue-collection-for-the-government, increasing competition per se, or abstruse technology considerations, such as loading the most traffic on every unit of commercially available spectrum, instead of maximising the economic benefits from it. Costs and benefits in the public interest are apparently ignored.

BSNL, MTNL and DD have networks that, if they could be channelled with the right mix of policies and private enterprise, could be part of the overall backbone infrastructure for open network operations, as is being done by a consortium in Singapore. If our policy-makers understand their biases as well as those of others, they could adapt beneficial policies from other countries, as demonstrated by many countries with different philosophies converging on improving broadband.

* “Broadband Stimulus Policy in Europe and the US: A Comparative Review”, Dariusz Adamski, Berkman Center for Internet and Society, Harvard Law School: http://www.nyls.edu/user_files/1/3/4/30/84/187/245/Adamski,%20SPRING%202009,%2018%20MEDIA%20L.%20&%20POL%E2%80%99Y.pdf

** “Network Policy & Economic Doctrines”, Robert D Atkinson, The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, October 2010: http://www.itif.org/files/2010-network-policy.pdf

Read the original in Business Standard

For more details visit https://cis-india.org/telecom/blog/ideology-and-ict

How the Telecom Act undermines personal liberties

Rajat Kathuria and Isha Suri — 2024-02-20T00:54:29Z

In this article, Prof. Rajat Kathuria and Isha Suri analyse whether the law has enough safeguards and an independent regulatory architecture to protect the rights of citizens. The authors posit that the current version leaves the door open for an overenthusiastic enforcement machinery to suppress fundamental rights without any meaningful checks and balances.

The Telecommunications Act cements government’s power to suspend internet services, does not establish independent oversight mechanism for interception, suspension orders. The article originally published in the Indian Express can be read here.

“Is Big Brother watching you? At the press of a button a civil servant can inspect just about every detail of your life your tax, your medical record and periods of unemployment. That civil servant could be your neighbour. There is mounting concern over this powerful weapon that the computer revolution has put in the government’s hand. But no civil servant will be allowed to examine personal files from another department, without written authority from a Minister. I shall be announcing legislation enabling citizens to take action against any civil servant who gains unauthorised access to his file.” (Yes Minister). The year is 1980, the computer revolution is just about beginning and questions of surveillance have become pertinent; safeguards in the form of separation of powers between the executive and legislative are announced by the Minister for the protection of citizens.

Although theatrical, Yes Minister can yet be invoked to characterise governments in most parliamentary democracies especially India’s.

More than four decades on, the Indian Parliament witnessed the smooth passage of several pieces of legislation, including the Telecommunications Act (TA) 2023, which justifiably seeks to bury remnants of colonial-era laws. While the modern digital age creates conditions for unprecedented surveillance reflecting the Benthamite tenet of maximum monitoring at minimum cost, the question on everyone’s minds is whether the law has enough safeguards and an independent regulatory architecture to protect the rights of citizens.

Before contemplating this weighty query, let us set the narrative in context with a quick recap of the major markers in digital governance in India that have concluded, at least for the moment, in the passing of TA 2023.

The institutional regime for telecommunications dates back to the late 1990s and was created more by accident and less by design. The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) became necessary because private sector investment came in when the public sector operator was both player and referee. Massive litigation followed, leading to the setting up of TRAI. Within a few years, the Telecom Dispute Settlement Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) was carved from TRAI to fast-track excessive litigation. In between, there was the dissolution of the first TRAI, only confirming who the “boss” was.

The desire to serve in regulatory regimes has surely been tainted by the goal of securing sinecures. This is not just an Indian phenomenon. For example, the Biden administrators wish they continue in office for long. It is in the nature of such positions that many of those appointed will never again be in a position of authority. There have been few instances after its dissolution that TRAI has taken on the government. The relationship between the legislature and the executive is complex but suffice it to say that such a separation in telecom is met much more in the breach.

The regulatory regime for telecom described above notifies subordinate legislation, enforces and adjudicates disputes — it performs the role of the executive and the adjudicator. One key safeguard for the protection of ordinary citizens is, therefore, already undermined. The separation of powers remains on paper and the exercise of authority through delegated rule-making ensures the government can intervene with little resistance.

In this background, TA 2023 poses challenges. Although undoing colonial-era laws is one of the stated goals, the re-purposing of some existing provisions and ambiguous drafting does little justice to that aim. For example, the definition of telecommunication services has been left open to interpretation. Internet-based services like WhatsApp and Gmail are, therefore, likely to fall under the Act’s ambit. Provisions empowering the government to notify standards and conformity measures or ask for alternatives to end-to-end encryption such as client-side scanning could undermine privacy. Further requiring messages to be disclosed in an “intelligible format” is irreconcilable with end-to-end privacy engineering. Tinkering with end-to-end encryption for compliance could create potential points of vulnerability.

The grounds on which such information may be sought, outlined in Section 20 (2) include sovereignty and integrity of India, security of the state and public order. Prima facie these appear reasonable. However, the current phrasing leaves room for expansive interpretation by overenthusiastic enforcement machinery — it could go beyond the letter of the law to please political masters. Research conducted in 2021 by Vrinda Bhandari and others found that many orders issued under the guise of public order restrictions would not qualify as legal per se. The Act cements the government’s power to suspend internet services (Section 20(2)(b)) and does not include procedural safeguards envisaged in the Supreme Court’s Anuradha Bhasin judgment such as the proportionality test, exploration of suitable alternatives and the adoption of least intrusive measures.

The Act also does not establish an independent oversight mechanism for interception and suspension orders related to telecommunications. These rules, framed in 1996 in line with the directions of the Supreme Court in PUCL v. Union of India and requiring a committee consisting exclusively of senior government officials, reflect inadequate separation. In the UK the law mandates approval of interception warrants by judicial commissioners. Separation of powers is however not a panacea; it is just a necessary condition for the effective functioning of institutions. We must also observe the counsel of John Stuart Mill for the maintenance of institutional integrity namely, not “to lay [their] liberties at the feet of even a great man, or to trust him with powers which enable him to subvert [their] institutions” — JS Mill, quoted by BR Ambedkar on November 25 1949, requoted by sitting Chief Justice of India on Constitution Day (November 26, 2018).

Kathuria is Dean, School of Humanities and Social Sciences and Professor of Economics at the Shiv Nadar Institution of Eminence and Suri is Research Lead, CIS.

For more details visit https://cis-india.org/telecom/blog/indian-express-january-25-2024-how-the-telecom-act-undermines-personal-liberties

Healing self-inflicted wounds

Shyam Ponappa — 2011-12-05T09:10:20Z

A spate of dysfunctional actions and retrograde developments has led to an unimaginable mess for India. Can the damage to growth prospects be undone? Does it need to be? If so, how? Three areas are discussed below.

Some months ago, the spectre was of consoling ourselves with a reduction of two per cent in growth, from 9.5 to 7.5 per cent. That’s history. What looms ahead is a larger, more serious threat. This ominous tidal-wave-in-the-making comprises many separate currents converging to undermine India’s take-off yet again. The prospect is long-term growth hamstrung by policy stand-offs, foreign direct investment in retail being a case in point, and social tensions fuelled by high unemployment.

Those who think India has arrived should be aware that it will take another decade of eight to nine per cent growth to be able to fund reasonable basic infrastructure and necessities for everyone. Why should it matter if you live in a rich cocoon? At the very least, you’ll be able to go out without stepping into filth or smelling it, or seeing masses of people struggling to survive.

Instead of a high-growth trajectory, we may get six to seven per cent, with luck. These prospects are clouded by wasteful expenditure, such as the perpetuation of an ill-functioning public distribution system and its concomitant, ration-shop-mentality, instead of efficient direct retail subsidies through electronic transfers. The negativity is amplified by fractious social and political tensions, and shoddy infrastructure crippling productivity: power outages, low-speed communications and poor logistics. One can argue (ah, argument) that the tensions are justifiable as an antithesis to increasing levels of corruption from political, bureaucratic and corporate kleptocracy feeding off the land and people, or hardening sectarian interests competing for predatory control. But if there’s one thing we can learn from others’ experience, it is to work together for better outcomes, or suffer; in game theory parlance, collaborate to optimise, or settle for worse.

Undoing Sectarian Alignments

Undoing the fractious underpinnings of sectarian alignments of language, caste and religion is beyond the scope of this article. The unpleasant reality is that unless such structural social impediments are addressed, malfunctions will continue. So we have this reality where, at one level, India is wonderful in the way people stream and swirl together, and at another, it is horrible because our potential is not manifested in living standards, with people fed, clothed and housed properly, and clean streets.

To return to misapplied intelligence in the political economy, consider three areas: interest rates, airlines, and telecommunications.

Interest Rates

It seems only the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) was unaware that the consequences of interest rate hikes since February 2010 would (a) not control inflation (short of an economic collapse), and (b) lead to a severe curtailing of growth. To be fair, some economists aided and abetted with remarks that interest rates must be raised because of high inflation.

By contrast, the accompanying charts for China and Germany (euro zone) show their negative real interest rates.

What we have to do is reduce interest rates, with selective credit controls to ensure that credit for speculation is constrained and costs are high, e.g., in certain real estate, commodities, stocks and derivatives. Implementation, likewise, has to be “intelligent”, with online tracking by exception, and not cumbersome or voluminous weekly or fortnightly reports that are manually compiled and/or analysed, filtered and then presented to committees for decisions.

Airlines

The structural anomalies in India’s taxes on aviation turbine fuel (ATF) and airport charges defy logic. For a decade, there has been talk of cuts in central and state taxes on ATF, but the problems continue. Consider the missed opportunity: India has a large domestic market and is well positioned for airlines to use this for establishing global leadership, as well as ubiquitous domestic services. Instead, the sector is bled for short-term government revenues, giving foreign airlines the advantage. ATF charges in India for international flights cost 16 per cent more than they do abroad, and local airlines pay over 50 per cent more because of taxes and additional charges. Consider the ludicrous stipulation that foreign airlines cannot invest in India, and the irrationality defies imagination. Add the illogic of a government-funded, loss-making airline undercutting private airlines, and we have the mess we are in.

Globally, airlines suffer from gratuitous free-market philosophies, the exceptions being airlines from strategically focused countries, e.g., in West Asia, Southeast Asia (Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand) and, of course, China. Wake up! Surely no one doubts that aviation is an integral aspect of logistics and transportation? The government needs to recognise this and build capacity, with policies like uniform, low state taxes. Also, as in telecommunications, aviation requires an oligopolistic structure with limited competition, which if ignored brings chaos and grief, because nothing else is sustainable.

Telecom & Broadband

The draft National Telecom Policy 2011 promises good things. Yet, like India’s potential, the promise will be realised only with convergent action. This iconic sector, which changed the way the country functions and is perceived, is on the verge of being ruined by dysfunctional intervention. For instance, the regulator and the government seem bent on applying retrospective charges for “excess spectrum”, taking the bottom out of the market. Worse, 3G services are hamstrung by government attempts to restrict services, while operators threaten litigation. Meanwhile, the bastions of “free market”, the US and the UK, are initiating shared spectrum policies. What good are our brilliant objective statements about excellent, affordable services if the government acts to achieve the opposite? And is it beneficial for India to hound solid companies like Telenor and Qualcomm (unless they commit transgressions), instead of taking a problem-solving approach?

If the confused doublespeak – of punitive charges, restrictive practices, PSUs building state-of-the-art networks, auctions and spectrum sharing, all in the same breath – continues, we may lose a decade or more because of instability and irrational policies. It is time for decisions on pay-for-use, open-access spectrum and networks. Incumbent network companies can be compensated along a downward-sloping power curve to give up their competitive advantage. We must start being reasonable and do things that make sense.

This article by Shyam Ponappa was published in Business Standard on 1 December 2011. Read the article at Organizing India Blogspot

For more details visit https://cis-india.org/telecom/healing-self-inflicted-wounds

Handy Origins of the winds of change

radha — 2011-04-02T14:59:01Z

A seminar in Bangalore revealed how mobile technology is being harnessed across India to bring about development and social change, reports Shrabonti Bagchi - DNA (6th Sept, 2009)

The Internet, for all the celebrated changes it has made in our lives, still had limited penetration in our country with about 80 million, largely urban and prosperous users. This severely limits its viability as a vehicle of development and social change. The mobile phone, on the other hand, has 400 million users in the country, and has undoubtedly become the first mode of communication in India to gain almost universal reach, cutting across barriers of location, region, community and social classes.
“The mobile phone has unprecedented penetration into classes of society that were largely unconnected with the outside world till now,” said Sunil Abraham, executive director of the Centre for Internet and Society, which along with Mobile Monday Bangalore, the Bangalore chapter of a global community of wireless industry professionals, organised a seminar, “Mobile Technology 4 Social Change”, in the city recently.
The idea for the event came from one of the co-organizers, Mobileactive.org, which is a network of NGOs interested in taking advantage of the mobile telephony revolution to bring about changes, informed Abraham.
Attended by NGOs, non-profit organisations, researchers, donors, and of course, mobile application developers, the seminar intended to throw open doors of communication between these varied groups of people.
Take the case of IFFCO Kisan Sanchar Limited (IKSL), for instance. This farmers’ co-operative formed under the aegis of fertiliser manufacturer IFFCO has tied up with cellular service provider Airtel to develop a special SIM card which enables users to receive voice and text messages everyday containing nuggets of information about various farming practices. It has around 2,75,000 subscribers in Karnataka alone, informs IKSL state manager G Raghunatha, and has made a huge difference to the lives of farmers.
A similar case is related by Subbaih Arunachalam who is involved with the MS Swaminathan Research Foundation, which has tied up with Tata Tele-services and Qualcomm and telecom developer Astute to create special GPS-enabled mobile phones (costing less than Rs.3, 000) that helps fishermen track weather reports, send out emergency messages in case they are lost at sea, etc., and also engage in price-point discussions with local wholesalers.
Several NGOs have also been quick to utilise the advantage of the versatility and ease-of-use of the mobile phone to disseminate vital information. Sreekanth Rameshaiah, director of Bangalore-based NGO Mahiti, spoke of an endeavour started by his group in Calcutta called My SME News which targets small and micro enterprises, sending out customised information for 11 micro-industries through text messages in the local language. They also plan to launch a voice platform soon.
Mobile payments brand mChek started an initiative on similar lines in Bangalore. The company uses its SMS-based mobile payment technology, which is embedded on all new Airtel and Docomo SIM cards, to enable slum dwellers to access banking and explore micro-finance options through micro-finance institution Grameen Koota.
Valerie Rozycki, head of strategic initiatives at mChek, said, “Access to low-cost banking over the mobile and being enabled with safe ways to save and convenient ways to make payments is life-changing for these customers. This is a sustainable business model to serve the un-banked and under-banked. So, these services will continue to thrive."

Let’s raise our mobile phones to that.

For more details visit https://cis-india.org/news/handy-origins-of-the-winds-of-change

Growth, India's Highest Priority

Shyam Ponappa — 2012-07-02T04:02:39Z

The government must focus on reviving corporate profits and, hence, growth, writes Shyam Ponappa. The column was published in the Business Standard on June 8, 2012.

“…people are starting to question the long-term Indian story… For the time being, people are just giving up on it” — a Moody’s analyst.

With growth in the fourth quarter of 2011-12 at 5.3 per cent, India’s economy is on the brink. If higher growth is not addressed as a priority, we will all lose enormous upside potential. We cannot afford disunity on this issue — neither the government’s arbitrary action nor inaction, nor stalling by the United Progressive Alliance allies, nor the irresponsibility of the Opposition. Continuing discord carries the risk of precipitating our own Greek tragedy.

We need to agree on what the biggest problems are, and how to remedy them. Here is the case for focusing on growth above all, and acting to enable it.

Symptom: Rupee Depreciation

The depreciation of the rupee is the acute symptom. Why has the rupee fallen so precipitously, and why might it get worse? Because of foreign currency outflows. Why the outflows? Declining corporate profits, as explained below.

The drop of over 27 per cent against the dollar since August 2011 is crushing for companies with foreign currency convertible bonds (FCCBs) and external commercial borrowings (ECBs). Estimates of redemptions this year range from $5.5 billion to $7 billion. With growing euro problems and global risk aversion, renewing external debt is possible only for the strongest companies. This problem has to be dealt with, despite the temptation to say, “Let them stew”. That works only if we are not all cooking in the same pot — which we are.

Some counter that an overvalued rupee needed depreciation to help exports. In depressed markets, growing market share is less likely. Some object to actions that protect companies with ECBs as “socialising losses”. While policies can have multiple effects, it is net benefits that matter most: whether losses in energy imports outweigh the export advantage in a global downturn, or companies that escaped high domestic interest rates will create more turmoil if they fail compared with bailing them out. These judgement calls need the objective use (to the extent possible) of financial models, balancing the resistance to creating moral hazard.

Declining Profits

We now face a problem of shrinking profits. With weakening global cues, a slowing economy, and lower capital flows, everyone – policy makers, enterprises and citizens – must seek to alleviate what will otherwise be a slow, difficult recovery. Collectively, concerted efforts are needed to improve profits.

High Interest Costs

Lower revenue growth in 2011-12 with higher raw material costs resulted in lower profit margins. In the fourth quarter, higher interest costs were 31 per cent of net profits, compared with 22 per cent for the previous quarter for 1,066 companies, excluding banks and financial entities. Interest costs for over 2,000 companies rose 38 per cent, following increases in the previous three quarters of 42-50 per cent. High interest costs and an unreconstructed budget triggered a downward spiral in profits. This was made worse by negative sentiment because of government ineffectiveness and capriciousness, epitomised by the Vodafone tax case: attempts to seize what the Supreme Court had annulled.

Foreign outflows triggered by decreasing profits were aggravated by a declining rupee — because of high imports with rising prices, particularly for oil and gold, but also for coal imports, because of local supply shortfalls. The consequent fall in stock prices and unstable tax policies combined to reinforce outflows, increasing downward pressure on the rupee.

There were, of course, other reasons:

Mismatches between growing demand and constrained supply, leading to persistent inflation. The Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI’s) raising interest rates to tackle this has only compounded the problem of reduced profits and investments, made worse by central and state government failures to augment supply.
Capriciousness in policies which, like Brazil’s missteps of the ’70s, began with distributing entitlements before assuring growth. Capriciousness now manifests in decisions like the Vodafone tax case.
Paralysis/incapacity, typified by the failure in the coal supply chain to power plants, unviable electricity distribution agreements and tariffs, new power plants running far below capacity, the unwillingness to take constructive decisions on spectrum and telecom policies fearing populist reactions, or the rollback of foreign direct investment in retail. This is compounded by the rise of populists, many of whom act as if good intentions obviate the need for domain knowledge, competence, organisation, or even simple arithmetic.

Solutions

Two salutary steps are possible immediately.

First, cut interest rates, although economists are divided on the merits. What should the RBI do? A big rate cut – 150-200 basis points – can improve profits, capitalising on softening input costs, as well as boost sentiments. Interest as a percentage of profits must be reduced, and sentiment improved to enable increasing investment. Interest rate increases as some suggest, on the other hand, will deplete profits further, accentuating lower growth and exacerbating the decline.
Second, the government should signal an immediate end to arbitrary tax moves.

Thereafter, systematic steps are needed to address difficult issues like telecom policy, fuel supplies and land acquisition. Telecom and spectrum reforms are overdue, as are energy reforms addressing the fuel supply-power generation and distribution-sustainable tariffs chain. Then there are all the structural elements affecting productivity – a big mouthful – that can only be addressed in phases.

In terms of sequence, the next significant effort could focus on the poster boy in trouble, the telecom sector. The empowered group of ministers (EGoM) can decisively abandon short-term government revenues in favour of user benefits, leading in time to even more government revenues. A persuasive case needs to be made, for example, to those who favour goals other than functional objectives — like government collections for purposes extraneous to the sector, such as for sanitation or for food. Such confusion in objectives arises from misinformation or incorrect reasoning, because (a) the primary objectives of a sector are its functional purposes; and (b) government collections increase with the prosperity of enterprises paying reasonable taxes. For this iconic sector, including its spectrum and broadband issues, the EGoM should be made aware of the recent report to the US President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology on sharing spectrum.*

"Presidential Panel Urges More Flexible Use of Spectrum", John Markoff, May 25, 2012, The New York Times: http://tinyurl.com/6m8hx72

Read the original here

For more details visit https://cis-india.org/telecom/growth-highest-priority

Gram Panchayat Development Plan (GPDP): An Opportunity for Funding Rural Internet Connectivity in India

abhishek — 2021-12-14T02:12:53Z

A paper titled "Gram Panchayat Development Plan (GPDP): An Opportunity for Funding Rural Internet Connectivity in India" authored by CIS' researcher Abhishek Raj got published in the book "Community Networks: Towards Sustainable Funding Models". This book was released at the United Nations Internet Governance Forum(IGF) 2021, and is also the official outcome of the IGF Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity (DC3).

Internet connectivity has become important for socio-economic development of any region, especially the rural and remote regions. However, a major population of the world including India still remains unconnected to the internet. The traditional ‘top-down’ approach for enabling connectivity has proved to be insufficient for rural and remote areas. In this paper, we discuss an alternative ‘bottom-up’ sustainable multistakeholder model for enabling connectivity in rural India which has an active involvement of the village community through ‘Gram Panchayats’ (also known as Village Council). We also discuss the funding mechanism for this model through ‘Gram Panchayat Development Plan (GPDP)’. We suggest that ‘Internet for Development’ be included as one of the cross-cutting development areas in the GPDP to fund access to the internet in villages.

Click here to access full PDF of the paper. (Refer p. 129- 146). The author extends thanks to co-authors of the paper Dr. Sarbani Banerjee Belur and Ritu Srivastava.

For more details visit https://cis-india.org/telecom/blog/gpdp-an-opportunity-for-funding-rural-internet

Govt set to gain ‘back-door’ access to corporate email

praskrishna — 2012-02-14T12:55:53Z

The government is just a step away from gaining access to RIM’s widely used BlackBerry Messenger (BBM) service, writes Shauvik Ghosh in an article published in LiveMint on 14 February 2012.

In a move that may raise serious questions regarding the privacy of corporate emails exchanged between individuals and employees, the Indian government is all set to gain “back-door” access to emails sent and received over Research In Motion Ltd’s (RIM) BlackBerry Enterprise Server (BES) within the next two-three months.

“There was a meeting last month with DoT (department of telecommunications) on the issue and the concerned security agencies and some home ministry officials,” a senior DoT official said requesting anonymity. “DoT has to furnish a list of enterprises from whom the key has to be acquired.”

The number of such firms is contained in an internal DoT note that was reviewed by Mint.

“There are about 5,000 enterprises using BES in India,” the note said. “These are communications between the employees of the enterprise only and therefore are not of high concern for security or intelligence agencies.”

However, the capability of using the key to access the communications when needed is still being developed.

Meanwhile, the government is just a step away from gaining access to RIM’s widely used BlackBerry Messenger (BBM) service.

“RIM has set up the necessary infrastructure in Mumbai to enable real-time access to BBM, as they had said they would,” said the official cited above. “They had provided for interception via the telecom service providers, but the intelligence agencies wanted direct access and so a server has been set up in Mumbai.”

The note said: “The company had installed the server in Mumbai. This has been inspected by a team of officers and permission for direct linkage for lawful interception was expected to be issued shortly.”

The move has raised red flags among privacy advocates over the motives of the government.

“There is no reason given by them on why they need to do this. There are no allegations of terrorists using BES or any indication that any of the 5,000 enterprises have any links to terrorists or other banned outfits in India,” said Pranesh Prakash, programme manager with digital media watchdog Centre for Internet and Society. “What is worrisome is that it is mainly commercial information that is shared on BES and in a large number of cases, this includes dealings with the government of India that they should not be privy to—things like auction bids, etc.”

Such powers can’t be used to pursue offences of financial nature, he said. “There cannot be economic reasons like tax evasion and such for intercepting such communications as the agencies that look into such offences are not authorized to or do not qualify to tap phones, etc.,” Prakash added.

On being asked about the development, an RIM spokesperson responded by citing the company’s January statement. This said RIM had provided a solution that enables India’s wireless carriers to address lawful access requirements for consumer messaging services, which include BBM and BlackBerry Internet Service email.

“The lawful access capability now available to RIM’s carrier partners meets the standard required by the government of India for all consumer messaging services offered in the Indian marketplace,” the company said in that note. “While the details of our regulatory discussions with the government of India remain confidential, we have been assured that all of RIM’s competitors must provide a lawful access capability to this same standard if they have not done so already.”

Mint reported last month that in order to prevent leakage of information, the government was proposing a legal provision, referred to as mandated local server hosting. This would put the onus on companies such as Skype and Google to locate the relevant part of their infrastructure within the country to allow investigative agencies ready access to encrypted communications on their servers.

Apart from leakage of data, the move is also expected to serve security interests and enable law enforcement agencies gain real-time access to information stored on servers and resolve jurisdictional ambiguity.

The original article was published in Livemint. Pranesh Prakash has been quoted in it.

For more details visit https://cis-india.org/news/govt-set-to-gain-2018back-door2019-access-to-corporate-email

Govt and BlackBerry firm wait for the other to hang up

praskrishna — 2011-04-02T10:46:54Z

Sunil Abraham speaks to Archna Shukla on the stand-off between the Government of India and RIM. The news was published in expressindia.com.

What is the current stand-off between the government and RIM all about?

The current logjam is with regards to BlackBerry messenger, email and web traffic. Around two years ago, the government had asked BlackBerry to allow it to monitor the text messages (SMSes) and phone calls exchanged through its platform. The government has since then been monitoring these services with the help of telecom service providers. It, however, still doesn’t have any means to monitor, intercept or decrypt BlackBerry’s messenger, email and web exchanges. The government wants to put in place a surveillance infrastructure to monitor these services and is asking BlackBerry to cooperate.

What is unique about BlackBerry services? Why doesn’t the government have a similar problem with Nokia or Apple?

Companies such as Apple do not provide email and messenger services in India. They only sell their handsets in the country. Nokia recently started providing such services under the Nokia Messaging Services Platform. The service, which includes enterprise solutions, consumer services and Nokia’s own messaging solution Ovi mail, is still in beta format. Nokia’s India spokesperson said the company will set up servers for its various services inside India whenever it kickstarts the functions in a full fledged manner.

Canadian firm Research in Motion (RIM), makers of BlackBerry, on the other hand, provides all these services alongside selling its handsets. It also manages all its data and traffic on its own without giving the access to anybody. The servers for these services are installed outside India. The government is concerned that keeping servers outside the country will give access to foreign authorities to monitor its local traffic and information. In the US, for instance, this kind of monitoring will be possible under the provisions of the Patriot Act.

Is BlackBerry the only one to use strong encryptions?

The use of strong encryption in information technology is prevalent in both the wireless industry and Internet platforms. BlackBerry, however, uses a superior encryption that is highly reliable and secure and it owes its popularity in the world markets to this feature mainly. According to Sunil Abraham, the Executive Director of Bangalore-based advocacy group Centre for Internet and Society, BlackBerry uses strong encryption with 256 bit keys. In comparison, gmail.com and Citibank.co.in use only 128 bit keys.

“If you have encryption on while visiting citibank.com or when using an offline mail client like MS Outlook Express, the government can identify the encrypted service that you are using and the recipient of your encrypted messages. Then they can launch a targeted brute-force attack to intercept and decrypt specific communications,” he says, adding that with the BlackBerry, the government can only see that you are having an encrypted transaction with the BlackBerry servers. They cannot identify the recipients and web services. This makes the brute-force attack difficult as a lot of time is spent decrypting unimportant messages.

What is the problem that RIM is facing in UAE and Saudi Arabia?

In UAE, it is facing the same problem as in India. In Saudi Arabia, BlackBerry will instal computer servers, which would allow the government some access to user’s data.

Can the Indian government and RIM meet half-way?

Unlikely. Though, as per PTI reports,

BlackBerry has made an attempt to break the logjam by offering metadata and relevant information to security agencies which will enable them in lawful interception, it has has failed to enthuse them. At a meeting between government officials and RIM, company’s representatives said that “they can provide the metadata of the message like the Internet Protocol address of BES and PIN and International Mobile Equipment Identity of the BlackBerry mobile”, sources said. Metadata is loosely defined as data about data. It provides information about a certain item’s content like how large the picture is, the colour depth, the image resolution when the image was created, and other data. A text document’s metadata may contain information about how long the document is, who the author is, when the document was written, and a short summary of the document. However, sources said the RIM, which has nearly one million subscribers across India, failed to enthuse the security agencies who want an uninterrupted access to the messaging services on BlackBerry platform. The security agencies apprehend that BlackBerry services in the present format pose a serious security threat.

The government may argue that if surveillance is allowed in some countries, it should have the same access, too.

So far, RIM’s public stand has been that its security architecture was specifically designed to provide corporate customers with the ability to transmit information wirelessly while providing them with the necessary confidence that no one, including RIM, could access their data.

Abraham of the Centre for Internet and Society says there is a possibility of a compromise behind the doors and the citizens may never get to know that a surveillance regime and infrastructure have been put in place to monitor their communications.

Click to read the original.

For more details visit https://cis-india.org/news/govt-and-blackberry

Government Policy and Guidelines

snehashish — 2013-03-15T06:27:26Z

In this unit Snehashish dwells upon the four main policy guidelines that were formulated by the Government of India.

The above were the four main telecom policies formulated by the government.

One of the main functions of DoT is to issue guidelines with respect to issuing of licence, allocation of spectrum, interconnection, etc. These guidelines operate as additional conditions, laid down by DoT with respect to conduct and functioning of telecom operators. For example, the DoT issued guideline for radiation standards in respect of electromagnetic radiations (EMR) for mobile towers, which came into effect on September 1, 2012.

The DoT has issued numerous guidelines across the years. However, it is important to discuss the DoT guidelines with respect to issuance of telecom service licences.

Basic Telephone Services Licences (BTS)
Cellular Mobile Telephone Service Licence (CMTS)
Unified Access Service Licence (UASL)
National Long Distance (NLD) and
International Long Distance Licence (ILD)

Guidelines on issuing of Basic Telephone Services

DoT issued guideline for issuing of BTS licences in January, 2001. The key features of the guidelines are:

The applicant must be an Indian company. There was no restriction on the number of BTS licensees in a circle. The applicants were also required to have a minimum amount of paid up equity capital. This varied from circle to circle. There was a cap of 49 per cent foreign equity on companies applying for the BTS licence
BTS licences were issued for a period of 20 years on a non-exclusive basis
The licences had to pay an entry fee before the grant of the licence. Consequently, the basic telecom service operators had to pay an annual licence fee based on their annual gross revenue
The basic telecom service operators also had to submit two bank guarantee as an assurance to meet the contractual and roll out obligation under the BTS licence
The Guideline also laid down that the license holders can also provide limited mobility services, by using the spectrum allocated to them for last mile delivery. However, service operators provided limited mobility services had to pay additional 2 per cent fee.
The Guidelines declared that a CMTS licensee can also provide fixed services using GSM networks within their service area. *This was done to satisfy cellular operators who were protesting against permission given to the basic telephone operators to provide limited mobility services.
The basic operators could carry intra-circle long distance traffic. However, the operators had to provide the subscribers, the option to choose their own long distance carriers. For this purpose, BTS licensee could enter into an arrangement with the national long distance licensee.
Basic operators were required to make their own arrangements for the installation of infrastructure, network equipment and, right of way. They were also allowed to enter into agreements related to interconnection with other licensee in other service areas. The terms and conditions of such interconnectivity agreement were subject to TRAI regulations and directions.

Guidelines on issuing of Cellular Mobile Telephone Service Licences

The DoT issued Guidelines for CMTS licences along with guidelines for the issuing of the basic telecom licences. These two sets of guidelines are generally similar to each other but they vary in certain issues.

In the light of the criticism of the previous licensing policy, the DoT guidelines on issuing CMTS licence proposed “informed ascending bidding process”[1] for auctioning of CMTS licence.
The CMTS licence was issued for a period of 20 years on a non-exclusive basis, extendable by 10 years.
The licensee can transfer; assign the licence only with the permission of the DoT, the licensor.
The prospective cellular operator had to submit roll-out plans and financial arrangements with the application.
The licence period was set at 20 years, extendable by another 10 years.
The winning bidder had to pay an entry fee. They also had to pay an annual fee which is a percentage of the annual gross revenue.
The cellular operator also had to pay an additional sum for spectrum.
The cellular operator, were given freedom to use any kind of network equipment as long as they satisfied certain international and domestic standards.
The cellular operators were allowed to enter into any interconnection arrangements subject to TRAI regulations.
The guideline also laid down that cellular operators will fully co-operate with law enforcement and government agencies in providing access to their infrastructure.
The licensees have to make their own arrangement for installing infrastructure and equipment and for right of way.

Guidelines for issuing Unified Access Service Licences

The UASL Guidelines were issued in November, 2003. They were consistent with the TRAI recommendations. Option was given to the existing licensees to continue under their basic telecom and cellular mobile telecom licences or migrate to the new unified access service licence regime. The main highlights of the Guidelines on issuing of UASL were:

Cellular licensees can offer limited mobility service within their short distance coverage areas.
Basic telecom service operators had to pay an entry fee for the UASL which was equal to the entry fee paid by the fourth cellular operator for the specific service area or the entry fee paid by the basic telecom provider in that circle, whichever is higher.
No additional entry fee had to be paid by the cellular mobile service providers.
The basic telecom service operator, who choose not to completely migrate to full mobility regime may pay additional licence fee for providing services in wireless in local loop (WLL). However, such service will be restricted to the short distance charging areas.
There was no additional spectrum allotted to the licensee for migrating to the UASL regime.
The unified access service providers can use any technology without any restrictions.

Additional Entry fee to be paid by the existing Basic Service Operators for migration to Unified Access Service License[2]

S.No.	Name of the operator	Service Area of the basic service operator (BSO)	Date of signing of licence agreements	Entry fee paid by BSO (in crores)	Entry fee paid by 4^th cellular operator(in crores)	Additional entry fee to be paid for migration to UASL(in crores)
1.	Reliance Infocomm Ltd.	Rajasthan	20.7.2001	20	32.25	12.25
		UP(East)	20.7.2001	15	45.25	30.25
		Maharashtra	20.7.2001		189+203.66*
				115	392.66	277.66
		Karnataka	20.7.2001	35	206.83	171.83
		Punjab	20.7.2001	20	151.75	131.75
		Andhra Pradesh	20.7.2001	35	103.01	68.01
		Haryana	20.7.2001	10	21.46	11.46
		Kerala	20.7.2001	20	40.54	20.54
		Uttar Pradesh (West)	20.7.2001	15	30.55	15.55
		West Bengal	20.7.2001		0+78.01*
				25	78.01	53.01
		Madhya Pradesh	20.7.2001	20	17.4501	0
		Bihar	20.7.2001	10
		Himachal Pradesh	20.7.2001	2	1.1	0
		Orissa	20.7.2001	5
		Tamil Nadu	26.9.2001		79+154*
				50	233	183
		Delhi	20.7.2001	50	170.7	120.7
		Andaman & Nicobar **	20.7.2001	1		0
2.	RTL	Gujarat	18.3.1997	179.0859030	109.01	0
3.	Tata Teleservices Ltd.	Gujarat	31.8.2001	40	109.01	69.01
		Karnataka	31.8.2001	35	206.83	171.83
		Andhra Pradesh	4.11.1997	161.47(old)	103.01	0
		Tamil Nadu	31.8.2001		79+154*
				50	233	183
		Delhi	31.8.2001	50	170.7	120.7
4.	TTL (Mah.) Ltd.	Maharashtra	31.8.2001		189+203.66*	-
5.	Bharti Telenet Ltd.	Karnataka	29.10.2001	35	206.83	171.83
		Madhya Pradesh	28.2.1997	35.33 (old)	17.4501	0
		Tamil Nadu	29.10.2001	50	79+154*
					233	183
		Delhi	29.10.2001	50	170.7	120.7
6.	Shyam Telelink	Rajasthan	4.3.1998	29.29(old)	32.25	2.96
7.	HFCL Infotel Ltd.	Punjab	7.11.1997	177.59(old)	151.75	0

Guidelines on issuing of National Long Distance (NLD) Services Licence

The DoT issued guidelines for NLD operations along with the licences. The main aspects of the Guidelines are:

Unlimited entry for carrying inter-circle and intra-circle calls
Total foreign equity of the operator should not exceed 74 per cent.
Private operators had to enter into an agreement with fixed service providers with in a circle for traffic between long distance and short distance charging centres
A timeframe of seven years was set for rolling out services. This timeframe was divided into four phases. If in any of the phases the operator failed to achieve its network coverage target then it would result in encashment and forfeiture of the bank guarantee of that phase
Private operators had to pay an entry fee of 25 million and a financial bank guarantee of Rs. 200 million.
Under the revenue sharing agreement, the DoT would charge maximum 6 per cent revenue generated by the private operator.
Private operators were allowed to set up landing facilities for accessing submarine cables and make use of available excess bandwidth.

Guidelines on issuing of International Long Distance (ILD) Services licences

The DoT issued new guidelines for ILD licences in December, 2005. This was done to implement licence simplification measures and also to allow higher foreign investment. The key features of the Guidelines were:

The ILD service, under the Guidelines was defined as network carriage or bearer service which allows NLD licensees international connectivity to foreign networks
The ILD service provider was allowed to provide all kinds of bearer services from an integrated platform. However, a separate licence was required for satellite and global mobile personal communication services.
The terms for the license: (i) the applicant must be an Indian company; (ii) the company must have net-worth and paid up capital of 2.5 crores; (ii) the total foreign equity should not exceed 74 per cent
The ILD licence was issued for a period of 20 year on a non-exclusive basis, and it would be automatically renewed for another term of five year subject to satisfactory performance.
The entry fee for the ILD licence was Rs. 2.5 crores and an unconditional bank guarantee of the same amount has to be submitted, which could be forfeited subject to failure in fulfilling the roll out obligations. The licensee had to also submit an additional financial bank guarantee of Rs. 20 crores. The ILD operators also had to pay a 6 per cent of the annual adjusted gross revenue as annual licence fee. The Guideline also laid down that an additional fee will be charged for the universal service obligation and use of spectrum
The ILD operator has to submit to the DoT detailed plan of the rollout obligation and also commission at least one gateway switch in order to interconnect with NLD licensees. Such networks must be in conformity with the international and national standards.
For provide ILD services, the operator may obtain leased lines from other access providers.
The ILD operators can provide lower-than-toll quality service, provided that there is no degradation in the quality of services.
The gateway and landing stations may be established. However, this will be subject to security and monitoring requirements.
The ILD operator had to furnish detailed accounts periodically and furnish any such information requested by TRAI.
An ILD operator, must co-operate provide facilities to law enforcement and government agencies for monitoring and surveillance. However, the licensee must also ensure protection of privacy of communication.

[1]. The auction process consisted of three rounds of bidding. A minimum bid price was prescribed for each round. The highest bid in the first round was declared the minimum reserve price in the second round. Subsequently the highest bid in the second round was set as the reserve price in the third round. The lowest bidders in each round were rejected to participate in the next round of bidding.

[2]. Annexure 1, Guidelines for Unified Access (Basic and Cellular) Service Licence, November 11, 2003 available at www.dot.gov.in/uas/Guidelines-Unified_License111103.doc

For more details visit https://cis-india.org/telecom/resources/govt-policy-and-guidelines

Google Policy Fellowship Programme: Call for Applications

praskrishna — 2012-05-24T15:38:28Z

The Centre for Internet & Society (CIS) is inviting applications for the Google Policy Fellowship programme. Google is providing a USD 7,500 stipend to the India Fellow, who will be selected by August 15, 2012.

The Google Policy Fellowship offers successful candidates an opportunity to develop research and debate on the fellowship focus areas, which include Access to Knowledge, Openness in India, Freedom of Expression, Privacy, and Telecom, for a period of about ten weeks starting from August 2012 upto October 2012. CIS will select the India Fellow. Send in your applications for the position by June 27, 2012.

To apply, please send to google.fellowship@cis-india.org the following materials:

Statement of Purpose: A brief write-up outlining about your interest and qualifications for the programme including the relevant academic, professional and extracurricular experiences. As part of the write-up, also explain on what you hope to gain from participation in the programme and what research work concerning free expression online you would like to further through this programme. (About 1200 words max).
Resume
Three references

Fellowship Focus Areas

Access to Knowledge: Studies looking at access to knowledge issues in India in light of copyright law, consumers law, parallel imports and the interplay between pervasive technologies and intellectual property rights, targeted at policymakers, Members of Parliament, publishers, photographers, filmmakers, etc.
Openness in India: Studies with policy recommendations on open access to scholarly literature, free access to law, open content, open standards, free and open source software, aimed at policymakers, policy researchers, academics and the general public.
Freedom of Expression: Studies on policy, regulatory and legislative issues concerning censorship and freedom of speech and expression online, aimed at bloggers, journalists, authors and the general public.
Privacy: Studies on privacy issues like data protection and the right to information, limits to privacy in light of the provisions of the constitution, media norms and privacy, banking and financial privacy, workplace privacy, privacy and wire-tapping, e-governance and privacy, medical privacy, consumer privacy, etc., aimed at policymakers and the public.
Telecom: Building awareness and capacity on telecommunication policy in India for researchers and academicians, policymakers and regulators, consumer and civil society organisations, education and library institutions and lay persons through the creation of a dedicated web based resource focusing on knowledge dissemination.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Google Policy Fellowship program?
The Google Policy Fellowship program offers students interested in Internet and technology related policy issues with an opportunity to spend their summer working on these issues at the Centre for Internet and Society at Bangalore. Students will work for a period of ten weeks starting from July 2012. The research agenda for the program is based on legal and policy frameworks in the region connected to the ground-level perceptions of the fellowship focus areas mentioned above.

I am an International student can I apply and participate in the program? Are there any age restrictions on participating?
Yes. You must be 18 years of age or older by January 1, 2012 to be eligible to participate in Google Policy Fellowship program in 2012.

Are there citizenship requirements for the Fellowship?
For the time being, we are only accepting students eligible to work in India (e.g. Indian citizens, permanent residents of India, and individuals presently holding an Indian student visa. Google cannot provide guidance or assistance on obtaining the necessary documentation to meet the criteria.

Who is eligible to participate as a student in Google Policy Fellowship program?
In order to participate in the program, you must be a student. Google defines a student as an individual enrolled in or accepted into an accredited institution including (but not necessarily limited to) colleges, universities, masters programs, PhD programs and undergraduate programs. Eligibility is based on enrollment in an accredited university by January 1, 2012.

I am an International student can I apply and participate in the program?
In order to participate in the program, you must be a student (see Google's definition of a student above). You must also be eligible to work in India (see section on citizen requirements for fellowship above). Google cannot provide guidance or assistance on obtaining the necessary documentation to meet this criterion.
I have been accepted into an accredited post-secondary school program, but have not yet begun attending. Can I still take part in the program?
As long as you are enrolled in a college or university program as of January 1, 2012, you are eligible to participate in the program.
I graduate in the middle of the program. Can I still participate?
As long as you are enrolled in a college or university program as of January 1, 2012, you are eligible to participate in the program.

Payments, Forms, and Other Administrative Stuff

How do payments work?*

Google will provide a stipend of USD 7,500 equivalent to each Fellow for the summer.

Accepted students in good standing with their host organization will receive a USD 2,500 stipend payable shortly after they begin the Fellowship in August 2012.
Students who receive passing mid-term evaluations by their host organization will receive a USD 1,500 stipend shortly after the mid-term evaluation in September 2012.
Students who receive passing final evaluations by their host organization and who have submitted their final program evaluations will receive a USD 3,500 stipend shortly after final evaluations in October 2012.

Please note: Payments will be made by electronic bank transfer, and are contingent upon satisfactory evaluations by the host organization, completion of all required enrollment and other forms. Fellows are responsible for payment of any taxes associated with their receipt of the Fellowship stipend.

*While the three step payment structure given here corresponds to the one in the United States, disbursement of the amount may be altered as felt necessary.

What documentation is required from students?

Students should be prepared, upon request, to provide Google or the host organization with transcripts from their accredited institution as proof of enrollment or admission status. Transcripts do not need to be official (photo copy of original will be sufficient).

I would like to use the work I did for my Google Policy Fellowship to obtain course credit from my university. Is this acceptable?

Yes. If you need documentation from Google to provide to your school for course credit, you can contact Google. We will not provide documentation until we have received a final evaluation from your mentoring organization.

Host Organizations

What is Google's relationship with the Centre for Internet and Society?

Google provides the funding and administrative support for individual fellows directly. Google and the Centre for Internet and Society are not partners or affiliates. The Centre for Internet and Society does not represent the views or opinions of Google and cannot bind Google legally.

Important Dates

What is the program timeline?

June 27, 2012	Student Application Deadline. Applications must be received by midnight.
July 18, 2012	Student applicants are notified of the status of their applications.
August 2012	Students begin their fellowship with the host organization (start date to be determined by students and the host organization); Google issues initial student stipends.
September 2012	Mid-term evaluations; Google issues mid-term stipends.
October 2012	Final evaluations; Google issues final stipends.

For more details visit https://cis-india.org/internet-governance/google-policy-fellowship

Gauging Users' Reactions Towards Zero Rating

Aadya Misra — 2015-11-25T15:30:14Z

In the ongoing debate about zero-rated plans and net neutrality, this blog post aims to study the possible effects of a survey conducted in Bangalore to gauge users' reactions towards such plans, and specifically "limited packs" offered by major telecom companies.

I would like to thank Amba Kak, on whose research the survey was conducted.

Zero-rating is the practice of not counting (aka “zero-rating”) certain traffic towards a subscriber’s regular Internet usage. There are different types of zero-rating that exist in the market.[1] For example, Facebook Free Basics or Internet.org as it was formerly known is a platform which provides limited content to subscribers, free of cost.[2] Airtel Zero is another such platform that provides free content to subscribers. Instead of charging these subscribers, the providers who choose to get on the platform are charged.[3]

Social media packs offered by major telecom companies are another variation of zero-rating. For a fraction of the price of regular data plans, users have access to apps like Facebook and Whatsapp. As per the Airtel website, a Whatsapp pack that allows 200 MB of Whatsapp for a month costs INR 46 in Karnataka.[4]

I conducted a small survey in Bangalore to determine the effects these limited social media packs have on users. I conducted interviews that were spread over five days in three different localities in Bangalore. I interviewed eight people and five recharge shops about their take on these limited packs.

I targeted two groups of users: new users of the Internet, and early adopters. The group of interviewees comprised of three university students, two shopkeepers, and three watchmen. I also talked to recharge shops in the neighbourhoods of the interviewees.

Through my research, I wanted to understand how users reacted to these social media packs, and gauge the popularity of these packs. This is where feedback from recharge shops would have been useful, however, what was surprising was that none of the shops I talked to offered these plans. Two out of the five shops had not even heard of Facebook or Whatsapp packs.

The fact that recharge shops did not offer these services made it difficult to identify subscribers of limited packs. I instead decided to talk to users of mobile internet, and discern their interest towards such packs. My questions followed a specific format: I’d find out which service provider the user subscribed to, their billing structure, their internet browsing patterns, whether they had heard of limited packs, and their interest towards such packs. Out of the people I interviewed, only three expressed interest towards these packs, Whatsapp in particular. For two of them, Whatsapp was the only service they used on their phones, and a Whatsapp pack seemed more useful to them than a regular data pack.

I also wanted to find out how much of an effect price played on the users while they chose a data plan. Even though a limited pack is substantially cheaper than a regular[5] data plan, six out of the eight users said they would choose an all-access data pack. Three of these six users expressed wariness towards such plans as they found the billing structures confusing. They were nervous about the possibility of being charged unfairly high rates in the accidental case of accessing services that were not provided by the limited packs. Further, three of the others were of the opinion than a regular data pack with full access to the internet was preferable to the limited access services provided by these packs.

From these interviews, one can assume that knowledge of these limited packs is low among both users and recharge shops, and the takers for the same are minimal. It would be hasty to jump to the conclusions from this admittedly anecdotal evidence, keeping in mind the small pool of interviewees, but it raises interesting questions with no easy answers: how great a factor is price for the users while choosing limited packs over regular internet packs? Perhaps more importantly, do these packs confine users to the walled garden, or will they venture out of it in order to access the whole Internet? [6]

My findings explore a tiny proportion of what users think about these plans. However, there is a long way to go for policy and regulation decisions.

[1]. The Background Paper to CIS Submission for TRAI Consultation on Regulatory Framework for OTT Services which can be found here: http://trai.gov.in/comments/24-April/Attachments-75/2015-04-24_CIS-background-paper_Net-neutrality.pdf

[2]. Facebook, Reliance Communications launch Internet.org in India by Nimish Sawant for Firstpost

[3]. Airtel Offers Customers Free Access to Select Apps With 'Airtel Zero'

[4]. The tariff rates can be found here.

[5]. For example, an Airtel Whatsapp pack is less than half the price of a one month 2G connection

[6]. Zero for Conduct by Susan Crawford for Backchannel

For more details visit https://cis-india.org/telecom/blog/gauging-users-reactions-towards-zero-rating

Funding of National Optic Fibre Network (NOFN) - Who's Accountable?

Aditya Garg — 2015-07-17T15:19:51Z

The National Optic Fibre Network, a part of the Government's Digital India Initiative, has been in the news since the recent Expert Committee Report. In this Blog, the author examines the Accountability of the funding of the project.

The National Optic Fibre Network (NOFN) is a project launched by the Government under their 'Digital India' initiative. Implementation of the project is being undertaken by Bharat Broadband Nigam Limited (BBNL), a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) created for the project. ^{^[1]} The project, launched in 2011, has seen multiple delays. The recent Expert Committee report on the project has now set an end-date for December 2016. It has also proposed an increase in the funding from 20,000 crore to 72,000 crore approximately. This is greater than a threefold increase.^{^[2]} The Universal Service Obligation Fund (USOF) provides all the funding for the implementation of the project under an agreement between them and BBNL. ^{^[3]} The close relationship between the two entities through their parent entity, however, can lead to a lax oversight of the entire process.

Universal Service Obligation Fund

USOF, established in 2002, provides effective subsidies to ensure telegraph services are provided to everyone across India, especially in the rural and remote areas. It is headed by the USOF Administrator who reports to the Secretary, Department of Telecommunications (DoT). ^{^[4]} Funds come from the Universal Service Levy (USL) of 5% charged from all the telecom operators on their Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) which are then deposited into the Consolidated Fund of India, and require prior parliamentary approval to be dispatched.^{^[5]} The USOF works through a bidding process, where funds are given to the enterprise quoting the lowest bid. However, the funds for NOFN were made an exception to this process since BBNL was the sole party involved in the implementation having being specifically created for it.^{^[6]}

Agreement to Transfer Funds between USOF and BBNL

The agreement^{^[7]} between USOF and BBNL provided for USOF to cover all the expenses of BBNL undertaken while working on NOFN project. It empowered USOF, amongst other things, to:

Revoke the Agreement in Public Interest within 5 years from signing; and to re-new the agreement or not to re-new it

Enforce Operating and Technical Condition upon BBNL while implementing the NOFN project

Have the Right to Inspect, Test and Monitor the enforcement of such Conditions so imposed

Conflict of Interest between both parties

The Administrator of USOF functions as an attached office to the Ministry of Dot, and is required to report to them,^{^[8]} while BBNL is an SPV established under the DoT^{^[9]} and has an Memorandum of Understanding ^{^[10]} with them. Since the parent entity of both the parties is the same, there is a definite conflict of interest. An analysis of USOF's largest and most ambitious program for mobile provisioning in rural areas showed slow progress due to^{^[11]}:

Lack of Accountability arising from the relationship between the Government owned incumbent and the USOF Administrator

No proper evaluation of USOF

Non-ring fencing of the fund

Poor quality project management

Lack of Review Mechanism with effective power

Similarly in NOFN, if no effective review mechanism is evolved to check the progress of the timeline and implementation of the projects, it may prove ineffective.^{^[12]} 3rd party review mechanisms have been suggested as an alternative to USOF mechanisms to ensure neutrality and efficiency^{^[13]} since the the agreement gives USOF the Right to 'Inspect, Test and Monitor', but there is no effective Review Mechanism available with the USOF to actually undertake the task. The ones available would also be working under the DoT and hence operate under a conflict of interest which may be misused to disburse funds even though they are not being used efficiently or in a timely fashion.

Other Funding Options - Private Actors and State Govts.

The Expert Committee also looked into two other funding options. Bringing Private Actors on Board in implementation of Phase II of the Project was the first.^{^[14]} This has been criticized as being unfair to Public Enterprises since they have been allotted the 'hard' areas while the Private Actors will get the 'soft' ones. ^{^[15]} The abysmal record of Private Actors in Rural Areas has also been mentioned as a factor against them.^{^[16]}

The second suggestion is to bring in State Governments. Andhra Pradesh has already decided to opt for its own SPV to implement NOFN while Kerala and Tamil Nadu are considering it.^{^[17]} The problems with having multiple implementing bodies are:

Transferring Funds to multiple bodies

Having to track their work separately

Lack of accountability for work done by them individually

Since a criticism of the current implementation mechanism has been based on the fact that 3 PSUs (BSNL, RailTel and PowerGrid) have been involved, having multiple SPVs would only add to the woes.^{^[18]}

The project, having been delayed multiple times, is now set for a December-2017 end. The funding for it has also been tripled. Hence, when we see that the funds are being given away so easily to BBNL and without any effective procedure to maintain the efficacy of the work done, it raises questions on the accountability of the Government regarding the fund which has been collected through revenue from all telecom operators (via USL). Therefore, a more open mechanism has to be ensured to reduce chances of bias towards BBNL by USOF, both having the same parent entity leading to conflict of interest between the two. This should be the focus right now, rather than introducing new funding options.

^{^[1]} 'Objectives, About BBNL' http://www.bbnl.nic.in/content/page/objectives.php accessed 2 July 2015.

^{^[2]} Yuthika Bhargava, 'National Opic Fibre Network - Revamp on Cards' (The Hindu, 30 May 2015) http://www.thehindu.com/business/Industry/national-optical-fibre-network-revamp-on-cards/article7261346.ece accessed 2 July 2015.

^{^[3]} 'Agreement For Support from USO Fund For Creation, Operation and Maintenance of the National Optical Fibre Network (NOFN) for Provision of Broadband Connectivity to the Panchayats to be executed by Bharat Broadband Network Limited (BBNL) Under Universal Services Obligation Fund, The Indian Telegraph (Amendment) Rules, 2012' http://www.usof.gov.in/usof-cms/GagendaPdf/NOFN_Agreement.pdf accessed 2 July 2015.

^{^[4]} 'About USOF' http://www.usof.gov.in/usof-cms/usof_home_contd.htm accessed 2 July 2015.

^{^[5]} 'USOF Brochure' http://www.usof.gov.in/usof-cms/USOF-Brochure.pdf accessed 2 July 2015.

^{^[6]} 'Indian Telegraph (Amendment of 2012) Rules, 1951' http://usof.gov.in/usof-cms/ActsRules/Indian%20Telegraph%20Rules%202012.PDF accessed 3 July 2015.

^{^[7]} 'Agreement For Support from USO Fund For Creation, Operation and Maintenance of the National Optical Fibre Network (NOFN) for Provision of Broadband Connectivity to the Panchayats to be executed by Bharat Broadband Network Limited (BBNL) Under Universal Services Obligation Fund, The Indian Telegraph (Amendment) Rules, 2012' http://www.usof.gov.in/usof-cms/GagendaPdf/NOFN_Agreement.pdf accessed 5 July 2015.

^{^[8]} 'Constitution, Powers and Functions of the Office of Universal Service Fund Administrator' http://www.usof.gov.in/usof-cms/usofsub/Constitution,%20Powers%20and%20Functions%20of%20the%20Office%20of%20Universal%20Service%20Fund%20Administrator.pdf accessed 6 July 2015.

^{^[9]} 'Company Profile' http://www.bbnl.nic.in/content/page/company-profile.php accessed 5 July 2015.

^{^[10]} 'Memorandum of Understanding 2015-16 with Department of Telecommunication' http://www.bbnl.nic.in/upload/uploadfiles/files/BBNL_Signed_Copy%20of%20MoU%202015-16.pdf accessed 6 July 2015.

^{^[11]} Rekha Jain & G. Raghuram, 'Role of Universal Service Obligation Fund in Rural Telecom Services: Lessons from the Indian Experience' http://www.iimahd.ernet.in/assets/snippets/workingpaperpdf/2009-06-03Jain.pdf accessed 2 July 2015.

^{^[12]} Ibid

^{^[13]} Ibid

^{^[14]} Mansi Taneja, 'Govt decides to rope in private players for NOFN project' (Business Standard, 15 January 2015) http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/govt-decides-to-rope-in-private-players-for-nofn-project-115011401190_1.html accessed 1 July 2015.

^{^[15]} Prabir Purkayastha, 'National Optical Fibre Network Project And the Expert Committee Report' (Peoples Democracy, No. 25, Vol. XXXIX, 28 June 2015).

^{^[16]} Ibid

^{^[17]} Mansi Taneja, 'National Optic fibre network: Govt to rope in state govts' (Business Standard, 29 May 2015) http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/national-optic-fibre-network-govt-to-rope-in-state-govts-115052900050_1.html accessed 4 July 2015.

^{^[18]} 'Trai: Optical fibre network project caught in red tape' (The Financial Express, 18 April 2015) http://www.financialexpress.com/article/economy/trai-optical-fibre-network-project-caught-in-red-tape/64699/ accessed 2 July 2015.

For more details visit https://cis-india.org/telecom/blog/funding-of-national-optic-fibre-network-who-is-accountable

From Open Citizen Radio Networks to the Race for .RADIO gTLD

sharath — 2013-05-05T05:00:01Z

In light of the recent shutdown of INDYMEDIA ATHENS server and its associated antagonistic Internet radio streaming services, Radio98FM and Radio Entasi, Sharath Chandra Ram, takes a look at open radio networks run by citizen operators as well as the politics around internet radio and it’s growing potential as a medium for citizen activism.

On the afternoon of April 11, 2013, the president of the National University of Athens (NTUA) ,Simos Simopolous ordered the university’s Network Operations Centre (NOC) to pull the network plug off the IndyMedia Athens server that shared the university’s network infrastructure. With it went down the Internet radio stream of Radio98FM, an independent radio station broadcasting from within NUTA along with Radio Entasi. The takedown as it were later revealed, was an order by the Minister of Public Order, Nikos Dendias followed by the MP Adonis Georgiadis of the New Democracy Party tweeting in praise of the Minister’s decision. (Translate Tweet here : http://bit.ly/ZiBDuR ) Indymedia Athens still continues to be accessible through the Tor network at http://gutneffntqonah7l.onion/

The choice and use of broadcast networks in political and citizen uprisings have had a culturally specific side to it. The massive 2006 democracy movement in Nepal was fuelled entirely by pirate FM radio broadcasts, as most mountainous regions have no access to telephony, Internet or print news delivery services. Recently the world saw the power of social media , youtube and Twitter -- in Iran after the police killed student activist Neda and later in the landmark crisis of Tunisia.

By combining the power of seamless accessibility that the audio medium provides by allowing the user to multi-task, along with the viral broadcasting ability of the Internet, we indeed have an effective tool for networked citizen science. Are there popular models that the community can emulate, and what are the barriers to entry in a trans-medial paradigm such as Internet audio re-transmission?

An Overview of Open Radio Networks

Let’s a take a quick peek into the wireless radio –VoIP service named ECHOLINK that I am fortunate to have had access to, over the last decade. Available to only ‘licensed’ and verified amateur radio operators, one maybe rest assured that strict legalities have unfortunately made such an open and transparent trans-medial global networked infrastructure impossible for commercial deployment or of use to the common citizen.

The ECHOLINK network was made possible thanks to the relentless efforts of amateur radio operators from around the world. It has enabled numerous wireless VHF local repeaters and links around the globe to be accessible over the Internet from practically any remote machine/device connected to the Internet, for both transmission as well as reception.

A memorable event was when I connected to a local Florida repeater from my bedroom’s PC and ended up conversing with an amateur radio operator who was driving around in his car through the Hurricane Katrina flooded streets with a VHF Handheld FM Transceiver, limited food supply and a gallon of reserve fuel canned in his backseat. Despite this, there was a sense of brethren and calm in his crackling radio voice that made it to the Florida repeater and then all the way to my home-station in Bangalore.

More recently, after the Fukushima Tsunami and Nuclear fallout, we observed that the Japanese government had jammed almost every radio repeater link, including the Emergency Amateur Radio service in Japan as they did not want any international contact to be made regarding the situation. Nevertheless after hours of trying, I intercepted a number of conference link nodes in Japan with people passing on information to each other about the deteriorating conditions in various prefectures. Below is a recorded excerpt from a conversation between two concerned citizens that I intercepted:

The Internet Radio Linking Project (IRLP) was a precursor to the Echolink network, invented by Dave Cameron (Callsign: VE7LTD) who installed the first three Windows O/S based IRLP nodes in Vancouver, British Columbia in 1997, followed by a more reliable Linux Node (VE7RHS) in 1998, after which the IRLP network soon spread worldwide. Amateur Radio operators with a VHF handheld transceiver and a custom (also DIY) IRLP interface hardware could connect to any local node within their RF Range and by using particular DTMF codes could establish a connection to any other node in the world by referring to a global list of node numbers. (http://status.irlp.net/).

ECHOIRLP enables Radio network node owners to support both IRLP as well as ECHOLINK networks on their repeater. A publically open trans-medial network such as this would certainly transform global information dissemination and accessibility, citizen journalism, community networks as well as disaster management.

Impedances and Emerging Trends in Commercial radio webcasting:

Similar radio network paradigms, albeit highly commercial, already exist within the mobile phone infrastructure, and with location-based services and audio databases like Spotify and audio detection apps like SoundHound on the rise, one could expect a huge boom in Internet radio services with contextual advertising on personal devices in the coming years. As with the press wars during the early 1930s in America, when newspapers viewed radio broadcasting as a formidable competitor, various impedances have kept Internet streaming away from the space that local wireless broadcasters and telecommunications networks have enjoyed for so long.

Unlike in the US or EU Copyright law, in India, there is currently no copyright law that clearly regulates Internet webcasting and radio retransmission on the Internet. In the United States however, webcasting of copyrighted audio content as well as internet retransmission of over-the air FM and AM radio broadcasts are subject to a per-performance royalty and an ‘ephemeral’ license fee. For the royalty calculations, transmission to each individual recipient is considered to be one ‘performance’. Estimating the market value of a ‘performance’ however is tricky, and the standing example that served as a reference, was the agreement reached between the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) that represents a majority of record labels that own copyrighted sound recordings and YAHOO! Inc , a then major webcaster and Internet re-transmitter. The RIAA-Yahoo! Agreement involved a lump sump payment of USD 1.25 million for the first 1.5 billion transmissions that amounted to about 0.08 cents/performance. The initial proposal by the CARP (Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel) however, set this at 0.14 cents/performance for pure internet webcasts and 0.07 cents/performance for over-the air retransmissions, which later was rejected and equalized to 0.07cents/performance for both, after another recommendation by the Register of Copyrights was accepted by the Librarian of Congress.

In addition to this, an ephemeral license fee has to be paid by a webcaster and is currently set to be at about 8.8 per cent of the gross performance fee. ‘Ephemeral recordings’ in traditional broadcasting refer to the temporary copy made off a phono-record to facilitate transmission of the final studio mix. The twist in webcasting however is that temporary server copies necessary for Internet retransmission are subject to this ephemeral license fee.

Another limitation is bandwidth. Unlike wireless radio broadcasting that has a radial spread over line of sight depending on the wattage of transmission, the number of listeners that a server’s Internet radio streaming can tend to simultaneously, depends on the available bandwidth at the transmitting end. For instance, a 128kbps homebrew audio transmitted over a 1Mbps line using ShoutCast or Icecast, could probably support no more than 10 listeners although the advantage that listeners maybe geographically disparate cannot be overlooked.

The possibility of having a central webspace that provides access to streams of re-transmission of say, every FM news channel across the world still remains unfeasible. The logical next step would be to install multiple repeater servers that can access radio Internet servers located in different parts of the world retransmitting both commercial FM broadcasts as well as independent radio broadcasts, and constructed similar to the Echolink infrastructure. Ofcourse this would only be possible with a community-funded initiative led by the global amateur radio community in tandem with commercial pubic service broadcasters who agree to sacrifice on re-transmission royalties in view of mass accessibility. This collaboration now seems very possible with the latest .RADIO gTLD community based application that was filed by the EBU in 2013.

The .RADIO TLD competition

With ICANN launching the gTLD program, a notable contest has started for ownership of the .radio gTLD. The latest applicant is the Eurovision Broadcasting Union (EBU), the largest international association of broadcasters with supporters including the World Broadcasting Unions (WBU) and the Association Mondiale des Radiodiffuseurs Communautaires (AMARC). The EBU has filed for a ‘community based designation’ application, a move that has been actively supported by the International Amateur Radio Union (IARU), (http://goo.gl/H23YF), the founding fathers of the global amateur radio community. The European Broadcasting union, created in 1950, is a not-for-profit association and is one of the key sector members and technical advisors of the International Telecommunications Union. It’s primary function has been to advocate and negotiate the interests of European public broadcasters.

But three other standard applications for the .RADIO domain have been made to the ICANN as early as in 2012 by – BRS Media, AFILIAS and Tin Dale (LLC) all of whom have decried the latest application of EBU. BRS Media, as early as in 1998, entered into an ingenious agreement with the Federated States of Micronesia (country code .FM) and Armenia (country code .AM) and began offering the pricey .FM and .AM domains to Internet radio broadcasters and media services. AFILIAS Inc., who own the .MOBI and .INFO top level domains with it’s employees and investors in the ICANN Board have applied for 31 additional TLDs apart from .RADIO.

The ICANN reviews each applicant on the basis of descriptions of their mission and purpose of interest in the .RADIO TLD. While all the others allow ‘Open registrations’ of second level .RADIO domain-names by any organization, the EBU application entails a much more restrictive registration process where the initial round of registrations shall be limited to existing broadcasters, trademark owners, internet radio, amateur radio broadcasters and radio professionals.

The support of AMARC as well as the International Amateur Radio Union (IARU), (http://goo.gl/H23YF), has helped EBU to fulfill ICANN’s important pre-requisites for a community-based TLD application – that is “to substantiate its status as representative of the community it names in application by submission of written endorsements in support of the application.”

Does this mean that we shall finally see the dawn of widely accessible Internet radio and digital re-transmissions of over the air broadcasts, with the amateur radio networks working in tandem with commercial public service broadcasters? Will the EBU truly be a representative of the global broadcasting community and will it treat US counterparts no different from EU and rest of the world? And finally, what impact shall all this have on Internet governance, dissemination of public opinion and citizen interventions? These are but some of the burning questions that shall surface in the near future.

Key References

http://www.echolink.org
http://www.irlp.net/
Summary of the Determination of the Librarian of Congress on Rates and Terms for Webcasting and Ephemeral Recordings (http://goo.gl/xPEj8)
http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/
http://www.arrl.org/

For more details visit https://cis-india.org/telecom/open-citizen-radio-networks-to-race-for-.radio-gtld

Frequently Asked Questions (Module 7.2.2)

Tina Mani — 2012-08-21T05:27:35Z

In this unit, Tina Mani gives answers to some frequently asked questions relating to Internet Protocol Television (IP TV), Mobile TV, role of Set Top Box (STB) in an IP TV network, features provided with IP TV services, Time Shift Television, Digital Video Recording, the difference between an MPEG-2 and MPEG-4, etc.

What is the difference between IPTV and Mobile TV?
Mobile TV is the availability of regular TV channels to view on your mobile. The network conditions of a wireless network are unpredictable, and hence the technology is built to adapt to varying conditions. Mobile TV and internet TV (TV viewing on the PC using an internet connection) are also sometimes referred to as Over The Top TV. IPTV makes assumptions about the reliability of the transport mechanism and works well only if the transport network provides sufficient bandwidth and like fixed line broadband, or cable as a medium of transmission.

What is the bandwidth required for acceptable quality of TV viewing?
With MPEG-2 compression, an SDTV signal requires about 3 Mbps, and a HDTV signal requires about 16Mbps. However, with MPEG-4 compression, an SDTV signal requires 1.5 Mbps and an HDTV signal requires about 8 Mbps.

What is the role of a set top box (STB) in an IPTV network?
An IP set-top box sits in the house and acts as an interface between the television set and a broadband network. It tunes to the right channel by listening to the multicast address for the channel, and decodes the signals so they can be played by a TV. It keeps a copy of the program guide or electronic program guide (EPG). It handles content protection using digital rights management (DRM). Set-top boxes also come with a browser interface for Web browsing and connectivity to external services provided by the service provider or partners. It provides home networking to connect to other devices like PCs or tablets in the house, and allows the playback and rendering of content stored on the PC (photos, music, and personal videos).

What features are usually provided with IPTV services?
Services like Video on Demand, Digital Video Recording (DVR), Time Shift television, games, interactive television like voting, and purchases from the TV can be provided with IPTV. The key difference between this and regular TV is the interactivity, which is possible because there is an uplink path from the user to the TV headend, which is different from satellite services with a one way path only from the headend to the user.

What is Time Shift Television?
Live TV programs are made available for viewing later by recording a day’s or weeks’ worth of programs either remotely or on a hard disk available on the set top box. These programs can be watched any time rather than only at the scheduled program time. This also allows ads to be skipped while viewing.

What is Digital Video Recording?
Live TV programs are made available for viewing later by recording a day’s or weeks’ worth of programs either remotely or on a hard disk available on the set top box. These programs can be watched any time rather than only at the scheduled program time. This also allows ads to be skipped while viewing.

How is Video on Demand different from Pay per View Services available with Cable and DTH services?
To offer Pay per View Services, a few fixed movies are made available for a period of time and ordered using an out of band message like an SMS. “Out of band” means, that a different medium from the one being used for television is used for communication with the service provider. Some service providers offer set top boxes with hard disk capacity built in, and transfer a collection of movies to the set top box, which can be viewed on purchase. In this case the choice of movies is limited by the capacity of the hard disk. True Video on Demand involves a big collection of movies that sit on the remote server, and that can be accessed from the customer premises whenever needed.

What is the difference between MPEG-2 and MPEG-4?
MPEG-2 was the original standard compression technique used for digital TV. MPEG-4 (also known as AVC) was introduced for low or variable bit rate mediums like mobile or internet, and various devices like mobile, PC and TV.[1] Demand for High Definition (HD) videos and larger screens made MPEG-4 attractive for the TV medium as well. MPEG-4 provides much higher compression ratios than MPEG-2, and better error protection for unreliable mediums of transport.[2]

Is IPTV service possible over cable?
Yes, IPTV over cable is achieved using the DOCSIS 3.0 specs for Cable, this is described in the module on Cable TV.

[1].http://bit.ly/RcJs47
[2].http://bit.ly/RcJxEN

For more details visit https://cis-india.org/telecom/knowledge-repository-on-internet-access/module-7-2-2-faqs

Free data, net neutrality: Discussion on TRAI paper

praskrishna — 2016-10-25T01:34:13Z

Given the complicated issues around net neutrality, an open house discussion was held in Hyderabad on October 24, 2016 on Telecom Regulatory Authority of India’s consultation paper on free data. The event was organized by TRAI. Udbhav Tiwari attended the open house discussion.

The consultation paper by TRAI can be found here. I largely espoused the position put forth by CIS in its Written Comments submitted to TRAI in June, 2016 which can be found here. The TRAI open house discussion was attended by:

Telenor
Reliance Communications Ltd.
Idea Cellular
Aircel
COAI & AUSPI
IAMAI
Datami
Internet Freedom Foundation

There was also a seminar on Unsolicited Downloads & Background Exchange organised by TRAI and IIT Hyderabad. The participants in the seminar were:

Venki Nishtala, CTO, Rediff.com
Ashwani Rana, Head of Connectivity & Access Policy, Facebook
Sachin Yadav, Director Forensic Services, PWC
Vijay Kolli, Head Mobile Strategy and Market Development, Akamai India
Dr. Abhinav Kumar, Assistant Professor, IIT Hyderabad

Also see the report on Indian Television

For more details visit https://cis-india.org/telecom/news/free-data-net-neutrality-discussion-on-trai-paper