Centre for Internet & Society

During this 18-19th a two-day long National Wikipedia Education Program Review meeting is going to be held at Christ University, Bengaluru. Around 25 participants of Wikipedia Education Program leaders from institutes like St. Agnes College Mangalore, St. Aloysius College Mangalore, SVERI Pandharpur, Maharashtra and Andhra Loyola College, Vijayawada will be participating in this event.

Students and faculty representing these educational institutions and have been part of Wikipedia Education Program (WEP) in Marathi, Kannada, Telugu and Tulu. They will get an opportunity to collaborate with other programme leaders and learn how Wikipedia is being used as an education tool for growing Indian languages on the Internet.

WEP is a global initiative that help students improve their digital literacy, linguistic, research and writing skills. WEP has managed to enroll about 3000 students so far to the programme that have contributed in creating Wikipedia articles and editing them as part of their classroom task. These students have enriched encyclopedic knowledge on several subject areas in five Indian languages.

The programme began in 2013 with a goal of piloting Wikipedia as a pedagogic tool for the undergraduate students. Both the educators of the WEP and of the university were new to one such approach. But inside an institution that sees over 20K new faces every year, educating students on creating Wikipedia articles and enhancing the same was very exciting. Students of five Indian languages--Hindi, Kannada, Sanskrit, Tamil and Urdu--were chosen as these languages were taught as second languages for many students. During the first and second year, almost all the students created new Wikipedia articles where majority of the articles were below accepted standard. The difficulty in making students learn about input tools in their languages, Wikipedia basics and wiki markup pushed for creating "how-to" video tutorials in Hindi and Kannada. Working with Urdu was discontinued after the second year because of program staff exit. Slowly, the program was reoriented in a manner that new students learned native language input and markup for the first two semesters by digitizing books on Wikisource and later by editing Wikipedia articles during the next two semesters. This helped better the output by increasing the quality of articles by nearly 30%. During 2015 the program was further improved by helping students get more hands-on training of input, wiki markup by intensive typing during the first semester, a few advanced options like interacting with each other on user talk page during the second semester, moving to Wikipedia editing and developing articles on Wikipedia sandbox during third semester, and finally moving the articles by peer-review from fellow batchmates, faculty and the larger Wikipedia community. The faculty is involved in the development and on-wiki review process ensuring quality.

The program so far has gone to the level of producing about 20% very good quality articles where nearly 0.6% of the articles are of really poor quality. The female to male ratio is surprisingly equal and at times, there are more female students as compared to the male ones. However, there is little concern in integrating the student-Wikimedians to the larger Wikimedia community.

Also, there is little exchange of learning and best practices between cross-language outreach programs across India across several different language. One of the ways to better this process is making program leaders talk to each other. This review meeting will help create a roadmap for WEP in Indian languages, cross-pollinate programme learning and build capacity among the leaders of the programmes. Hopefully, this event will help identify the challenges across different languages and ways and means of addressing them, sharing learning and best practices, and creating a roadmap for collaborating with each other.
The views and opinions expressed on this page are those of their individual authors. Unless the opposite is explicitly stated, or unless the opposite may be reasonably inferred, CIS does not subscribe to these views and opinions which belong to their individual authors. CIS does not accept any responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the views and opinions of these individual authors. For an official statement from CIS on a particular issue, please contact us directly.